Financial Incentive-Based Approaches for Weight Loss A Randomized Trial

被引:599
|
作者
Volpp, Kevin G. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
John, Leslie K. [7 ]
Troxel, Andrea B. [1 ,5 ,6 ]
Norton, Laurie [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Fassbender, Jennifer [5 ,6 ]
Loewenstein, George [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Leonard Davis Inst Hlth Econ, Ctr Hlth Incent, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Philadelphia Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Ctr Hlth Equ Res & Promot, Wharton Sch, Philadelphia, PA USA
[3] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Dept Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[4] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Wharton Sch, Dept Hlth Care Management, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[5] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Ctr Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[6] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Dept Biostat & Epidemiol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[7] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Social & Decis Sci, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.2008.804
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context Identifying effective obesity treatment is both a clinical challenge and a public health priority due to the health consequences of obesity. Objective To determine whether common decision errors identified by behavioral economists such as prospect theory, loss aversion, and regret could be used to design an effective weight loss intervention. Design, Setting, and Participants Fifty- seven healthy participants aged 30- 70 years with a body mass index of 30- 40 were randomized to 3 weight loss plans: monthly weigh- ins, a lottery incentive program, or a deposit contract that allowed for participant matching, with a weight loss goal of 1 lb ( 0.45 kg) a week for 16 weeks. Participants were recruited May- August 2007 at the Philadelphia VA Medical Center in Pennsylvania and were followed up through June 2008. Main Outcome Measures Weight loss after 16 weeks. Results The incentive groups lost significantly more weight than the control group ( mean, 3.9 lb). Compared with the control group, the lottery group lost a mean of 13.1 lb ( 95% confidence interval [ CI] of the difference in means, 1.95- 16.40; P=. 02) and the deposit contract group lost a mean of 14.0 lb ( 95% CI of the difference in means, 3.69- 16.43; P =. 006). About half of those in both incentive groups met the 16- lb target weight loss: 47.4% ( 95% CI, 24.5%- 71.1%) in the deposit contract group and 52.6% ( 95% CI, 28.9%- 75.6%) in the lottery group, whereas 10.5% ( 95% CI, 1.3%- 33.1%; P=. 01) in the control group met the 16- lb target. Although the net weight loss between enrollment in the study and at the end of 7 months was larger in the incentive groups ( 9.2 lb; t= 1.21; 95% CI, - 3.20 to 12.66; P=. 23, in the lottery group and 6.2 lb; t= 0.52; 95% CI, - 5.17 to 8.75; P=. 61 in the deposit contract group) than in the control group ( 4.4 lb), these differences were not statistically significant. However, incentive participants weighed significantly less at 7 months than at the study start ( P=. 01 for the lottery group; P=. 03 for the deposit contract group) whereas controls did not. Conclusions The use of economic incentives produced significant weight loss during the 16 weeks of intervention that was not fully sustained. The longer- term use of incentives should be evaluated. Trial Registration clinicaltrials. gov Identifier: NCT00520611.
引用
收藏
页码:2631 / 2637
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Incentive-based formularies
    Thomas, CP
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 349 (23): : 2186 - 2188
  • [22] On Incentive-based Tagging
    Yang, Xuan S.
    Cheng, Reynold
    Mo, Luyi
    Kao, Ben
    Cheung, David W.
    2013 IEEE 29TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATA ENGINEERING (ICDE), 2013, : 685 - 696
  • [23] IS HEALTH GOAL ADHERENCE HIGHER IF WEIGHT LOSS INTERVENTION PATIENTS ARE RANDOMIZED TO THEIR PREFERRED FINANCIAL INCENTIVE?
    Adhiyaman, Akshitha
    Orstad, Stephanie
    Gronda, Andres N.
    Jay, Melanie
    Ladapo, Joseph
    Wittleder, Sandra
    Wali, Soma
    ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2022, 56 (SUPP 1) : S499 - S499
  • [24] A randomized-controlled trial of a digital, small incentive-based intervention for working adults with short sleep
    Ong, Ju Lynn
    Massar, Stijn A. A.
    Lau, TeYang
    Ng, Ben K. L.
    Chan, Lit Fai
    Koek, Daphne
    Cheong, Karen
    Chee, Michael W. L.
    SLEEP, 2023,
  • [25] TOWARD INCENTIVE-BASED PROCEDURE - 3 APPROACHES FOR REGULATING SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE
    ELLIOTT, ED
    BOSTON UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW, 1989, 69 (03) : 487 - 511
  • [26] Feasibility Trial of an Unconventional Financial Incentive Based Smoking Cessation Study (Randomized Clinical Trial)
    Sathya, S. G.
    Zaw, C.
    Holt, G. E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2022, 205
  • [27] FINANCIAL INCENTIVES FOR LONGER-TERM WEIGHT LOSS: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    John, Leslie
    Loewenstein, George
    Volpp, Kevin
    Norton, Laurie
    Troxel, Andrea
    Fassbender, Jennifer
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2010, 25 : 278 - 279
  • [28] Individual- Versus Group-Based Financial Incentives for Weight Loss A Randomized, Controlled Trial
    Kullgren, Jeffrey T.
    Troxel, Andrea B.
    Loewenstein, George
    Asch, David A.
    Norton, Laurie A.
    Wesby, Lisa
    Tao, Yuanyuan
    Zhu, Jingsan
    Volpp, Kevin G.
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2013, 158 (07) : 505 - +
  • [29] iTag: Incentive-Based Tagging
    Lei, Siyu
    Yang, Xuan S.
    Mo, Luyi
    Maniu, Silviu
    Cheng, Reynold
    2014 IEEE 30TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATA ENGINEERING (ICDE), 2014, : 1186 - 1189
  • [30] Incentive-Based Capital Requirements
    Eufinger, Christian
    Gill, Andrej
    MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2017, 63 (12) : 4101 - 4113