Analyzing the Practice of Life Cycle Assessment Focus on the Building Sector

被引:32
|
作者
Saunders, Christi L. [1 ]
Landis, Amy E. [1 ]
Mecca, Laurel P. [2 ]
Jones, Alex K. [1 ]
Schaefer, Laura A. [1 ]
Bilec, Melissa M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Univ Ctr Social & Urban Res, Qualitat Data Anal Program, Pittsburgh, PA USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
architecture; engineering; and construction (AEC); buildings; focus groups; industrial ecology; life cycle assessment (LCA); sustainability; OCCUPANT TRAINING MATERIALS; ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; UNRESOLVED PROBLEMS; CHALLENGES; OFFICE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1111/jiec.12028
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a quantitative tool used to evaluate the environmental impacts of products or processes. With respect to buildings, LCA can be used to evaluate the environmental impacts of an entire building's life cycle. Currently LCA in the building area is used in a limited capacity, primarily to select building products. In order to determine the causality for the lack of whole-building LCAs, focus groups with members of the architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) communities were held. This article investigates the current level of knowledge of LCA in the AEC community and then discusses the benefits and barriers to the practice of LCA. In summary, the goal of the research was to identify why LCA is not used to its fullest potential in a whole-building LCA. In an open forum and moderated setting, focus group participants were asked individually to self-identify their experience with LCA, a brief education session on LCA was held, and then benefits and barriers to LCA were discussed. The focus group sessions were transcribed and systematically coded by social researchers in order to analyze the results. Hybrid flow and radar charts were developed. From the focus group results, the most important benefit to LCA was provides information about environmental impacts. The results did not identify a prominent barrier; however, building-related metrics were ascertained to be one of the more crucial barriers. The benefits and barriers classified by this analysis will be utilized to develop a subsequent online survey to further understand the LCA and AEC community.
引用
收藏
页码:777 / 788
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Life cycle assessment: principles, practice and prospects
    Peters, Greg
    AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2010, 17 (03) : 190 - 191
  • [42] LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF WINE: FOCUS ON WATER USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT
    Comandaru, Iulia Maria
    Barjoveanu, George
    Peiu, Nicolae
    Ene, Simona-Andreea
    Teodosiu, Carmen
    ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2012, 11 (03): : 533 - 543
  • [43] Life cycle assessment and life cycle costing of multistorey building: Attributional and consequential perspectives
    Fauzi, Rizal Taufiq
    Lavoie, Patrick
    Tanguy, Audrey
    Amor, Ben
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 197
  • [44] Life-cycle costing and its use in the Swedish building sector
    Sterner, E
    BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION, 2000, 28 (5-6): : 387 - 393
  • [45] Modular methodology for building life cycle assessment for a building stock model
    Szalay, Zs.
    Kiss, B.
    LIFE-CYCLE ANALYSIS AND ASSESSMENT IN CIVIL ENGINEERING: TOWARDS AN INTEGRATED VISION, 2019, : 855 - 861
  • [46] China's energy consumption in the building sector: A life cycle approach
    Zhang, Yan
    He, Chen-Qi
    Tang, Bao-Jun
    Wei, Yi-Ming
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2015, 94 : 240 - 251
  • [47] Potential for interconnection of tools for cost estimation and life cycle assessment of partial carbon footprint in the building sector in Czechia
    Lupisek, A.
    Nehasilova, M.
    Zelezna, J.
    Hajek, P.
    Pospisilova, B.
    Hanak, M.
    LIFE-CYCLE ANALYSIS AND ASSESSMENT IN CIVIL ENGINEERING: TOWARDS AN INTEGRATED VISION, 2019, : 759 - 766
  • [48] Green Template for Life Cycle Assessment of Buildings Based on Building Information Modeling: Focus on Embodied Environmental Impact
    Lee, Sungwoo
    Tae, Sungho
    Roh, Seungjun
    Kim, Taehyung
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2015, 7 (12) : 16498 - 16512
  • [49] Functional unit influence on building life cycle assessment
    Hugo Henrique de Simone Souza
    Patrícia Pereira de Abreu Evangelista
    Diego Lima Medeiros
    Jaume Albertí
    Pere Fullana-i-Palmer
    Marc Árpád Boncz
    Asher Kiperstok
    Jardel Pereira Gonçalves
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2021, 26 : 435 - 454
  • [50] Life cycle environmental assessment of temporary building constructions
    Grosso, Mario
    Thiebat, Francesca
    6TH INTERNATIONAL BUILDING PHYSICS CONFERENCE (IBPC 2015), 2015, 78 : 3180 - 3185