Analyzing the Practice of Life Cycle Assessment Focus on the Building Sector

被引:32
|
作者
Saunders, Christi L. [1 ]
Landis, Amy E. [1 ]
Mecca, Laurel P. [2 ]
Jones, Alex K. [1 ]
Schaefer, Laura A. [1 ]
Bilec, Melissa M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Univ Ctr Social & Urban Res, Qualitat Data Anal Program, Pittsburgh, PA USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
architecture; engineering; and construction (AEC); buildings; focus groups; industrial ecology; life cycle assessment (LCA); sustainability; OCCUPANT TRAINING MATERIALS; ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; UNRESOLVED PROBLEMS; CHALLENGES; OFFICE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1111/jiec.12028
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a quantitative tool used to evaluate the environmental impacts of products or processes. With respect to buildings, LCA can be used to evaluate the environmental impacts of an entire building's life cycle. Currently LCA in the building area is used in a limited capacity, primarily to select building products. In order to determine the causality for the lack of whole-building LCAs, focus groups with members of the architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) communities were held. This article investigates the current level of knowledge of LCA in the AEC community and then discusses the benefits and barriers to the practice of LCA. In summary, the goal of the research was to identify why LCA is not used to its fullest potential in a whole-building LCA. In an open forum and moderated setting, focus group participants were asked individually to self-identify their experience with LCA, a brief education session on LCA was held, and then benefits and barriers to LCA were discussed. The focus group sessions were transcribed and systematically coded by social researchers in order to analyze the results. Hybrid flow and radar charts were developed. From the focus group results, the most important benefit to LCA was provides information about environmental impacts. The results did not identify a prominent barrier; however, building-related metrics were ascertained to be one of the more crucial barriers. The benefits and barriers classified by this analysis will be utilized to develop a subsequent online survey to further understand the LCA and AEC community.
引用
收藏
页码:777 / 788
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Life Cycle Assessment Applied to the Sector of Microelectronic Devices
    Matarazzo, Agata
    Ingrao, Carlo
    Clasadonte, Maria Teresa
    TECHNOLOGIES AND MATERIALS FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY, ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY (TMREES), 2016, 1758
  • [32] Life Cycle Assessment and its Application to the Aviation Sector
    Koscakova, Martina
    Korba, Peter
    Sekelova, Ingrid
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2023, 36 (08) : 902 - 915
  • [33] The legitimacy of life cycle assessment in the waste management sector
    David Lazarevic
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2018, 23 : 1415 - 1428
  • [34] Life-cycle assessment in the renewable energy sector
    Góralczyk, M
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2003, 75 (3-4) : 205 - 211
  • [35] The legitimacy of life cycle assessment in the waste management sector
    Lazarevic, David
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2018, 23 (07): : 1415 - 1428
  • [36] Life Cycle Assessment and its Application to the Aviation Sector
    Koscakova, Martina
    Korba, Peter
    Sekelova, Ingrid
    ACTA MONTANISTICA SLOVACA, 2022, 27 (04) : 902 - 915
  • [37] Impact of building service life models on life cycle assessment
    Grant, Aneurin
    Ries, Robert
    BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION, 2013, 41 (02): : 168 - 186
  • [38] Analyzing the life cycle environmental impacts in the Chinese building design process
    Yang, W.
    Li, Q. Y.
    Yang, L.
    Ren, J.
    Yang, X. Q.
    LIFE-CYCLE ANALYSIS AND ASSESSMENT IN CIVIL ENGINEERING: TOWARDS AN INTEGRATED VISION, 2019, : 871 - 878
  • [39] Achieving consistency in life cycle assessment practice within the European construction sector: the role of the EeBGuide InfoHub
    Sébastien Lasvaux
    Johannes Gantner
    Bastian Wittstock
    Manuel Bazzana
    Nicoleta Schiopu
    Tom Saunders
    Cristina Gazulla
    Jo Ann Mundy
    Christer Sjöström
    Pere Fullana-i-Palmer
    Tim Barrow-Williams
    Anna Braune
    Jane Anderson
    Katrin Lenz
    Zsoka Takacs
    Julien Hans
    Jacques Chevalier
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2014, 19 : 1783 - 1793
  • [40] Achieving consistency in life cycle assessment practice within the European construction sector: the role of the EeBGuide InfoHub
    Lasvaux, Sebastien
    Gantner, Johannes
    Wittstock, Bastian
    Bazzana, Manuel
    Schiopu, Nicoleta
    Saunders, Tom
    Gazulla, Cristina
    Mundy, Jo Ann
    Sjostrom, Christer
    Fullana-i-Palmer, Pere
    Barrow-Williams, Tim
    Braune, Anna
    Anderson, Jane
    Lenz, Katrin
    Takacs, Zsoka
    Hans, Julien
    Chevalier, Jacques
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2014, 19 (11): : 1783 - 1793