Comparison of perioperative outcomes and cost of robotic-assisted laparoscopy, laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer

被引:97
|
作者
Coronado, Pluvio J. [1 ]
Herraiz, Miguel A. [1 ]
Magrina, Javier F. [2 ]
Fasero, Maria [3 ]
Vidart, Jose A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Complutense Madrid, Hosp Clin San Carlos, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
[2] Mayo Clin Scottsdale, Dept Gynecol Surg, Scottsdale, AZ USA
[3] Hosp La Zarzuela Madrid, Madrid, Spain
关键词
Endometrial cancer; Robotic; Laparoscopy; Survival; Cost; SURGICAL OUTCOMES; HYSTERECTOMY; LYMPHADENECTOMY; SURGERY; PROGRAM; SAFETY; OBESE; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.07.006
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To analyze the perioperative outcomes and cost of three surgical approaches in the treatment of endometrial cancer: robotic, laparoscopy and laparotomy. Study design: We studied 347 patients with endometrial cancer treated in a single institution: 71 patients were operated by robotics, 84 by conventional laparoscopy and 192 by laparotomy. All patients underwent total hysterectomy, bilateral salpingoophorectomy and pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy depending on the pathological features. Results: Operative time was longer in the laparoscopy group as compared to robotics and laparotomy (218.2 min, 189.2 min, and 157.4 min respectively, p = 0.000). The estimated blood loss was lower in the robotic group relative to the other groups (99.4 ml in robotic, 190.0 ml in laparoscopy and 231.5 ml in laparotomy, p = 0.000). Similar findings were observed for the pre- and post-operative mean hemoglobin levels (-1.3 g/dl, -2.3 g/dl and -2.5 g/dl respectively, p = 0.000), and transfusion rate (4.2%, 7.1% and 14.1% respectively, p = 0.036). The length of hospital stay was higher in the laparotomy group compared to robotics and laparoscopy (8.1, 3.5 and 4.6 days respectively; p = 0.000). The conversion rate to laparotomy was lower for robotics (2.4% for robotics and 8.1% for laparoscopy, p = 0.181). Overall complications were similar for robotics and laparoscopy (21.1%, 28.5%) (p = 0.079). Robotic complications were significantly lower as compared to laparotomy (21.2 vs 34.9% (p = 0.036). No differences were found relative to disease-free or overall survival among the three groups. The global costs were similar for the three approaches (p = 0.566). Conclusion: Robotics is a safe alternative to laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer patients, offering improved perioperative outcomes and similar cost as compared to the other two surgical approaches. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 294
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Surgical treatment of endometrial cancer: laparotomy or laparoscopy?
    Majchrzak-Baczmanska, Dominika
    Antosiak, Beata
    Malinowski, Andrzej
    MENOPAUSE REVIEW-PRZEGLAD MENOPAUZALNY, 2013, 12 (02): : 125 - 131
  • [42] Carbon footprint of robotically-assisted laparoscopy, laparoscopy and laparotomy: a comparison
    Woods, Demetrius L.
    McAndrew, Thomas
    Nevadunsky, Nicole
    Hou, June Y.
    Goldberg, Gary
    Kuo, Dennis Yi-Shin
    Isani, Sara
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2015, 11 (04): : 406 - 412
  • [44] RETRACTED: A Meta-Analysis of Robotic Surgery in Endometrial Cancer: Comparison with Laparoscopy and Laparotomy (Retracted Article)
    Wang, Jia
    Li, Xiaomao
    Wu, Haotian
    Zhang, Yu
    Wang, Fei
    DISEASE MARKERS, 2020, 2020
  • [45] Cost comparison of robotic, single port and conventional laparoscopy for early stage endometrial cancer
    Knight, J.
    Starbuck, K.
    Escobar, P.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2012, 125 : S166 - S166
  • [46] Robotic-assisted laparoscopy for the excision of a pelvic leiomyosarcoma
    Chavin G.
    Gettman M.
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2008, 1 (4) : 315 - 317
  • [47] Donor robotic-assisted laparoscopy for uterus transplantation
    Diaz-Feijoo, Berta
    Rius, Mariona
    Gracia, Meritxell
    Musquera, Mireia
    Magaldi, Marta
    Peri, Luis
    Alcaraz, Antonio
    Carmona, Francisco
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2022, 117 (03) : 651 - 652
  • [48] Perioperative Outcomes in Robotic-Assisted Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Treatment of Endometrial Cancer
    Nezhat, Farr R.
    Apostol, Radu
    Vega, Mario
    Sirota, Ido
    Vetere, Patrick F.
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY, 2019, 35 (06) : 350 - 355
  • [49] Comparison of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopy for extraperitoneal paraaortic lymphadenectomy
    Diaz-Feijoo, B.
    Gil-Ibanez, B.
    Perez-Benavente, A.
    Martinez-Gomez, X.
    Colas, E.
    Sanchez-Iglesias, J. L.
    Cabrera-Diaz, S.
    Puig-Puig, O.
    Magrina, J. F.
    Gil-Moreno, A.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2014, 132 (01) : 98 - 101
  • [50] Conventional Laparoscopy vs. Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopy for Sacrocolpopexy and Sacrocervicopexy: a Review
    Marron Wong
    Stephanie Morris
    Current Obstetrics and Gynecology Reports, 2017, 6 (3) : 243 - 248