Comparison of perioperative outcomes and cost of robotic-assisted laparoscopy, laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer

被引:97
|
作者
Coronado, Pluvio J. [1 ]
Herraiz, Miguel A. [1 ]
Magrina, Javier F. [2 ]
Fasero, Maria [3 ]
Vidart, Jose A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Complutense Madrid, Hosp Clin San Carlos, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
[2] Mayo Clin Scottsdale, Dept Gynecol Surg, Scottsdale, AZ USA
[3] Hosp La Zarzuela Madrid, Madrid, Spain
关键词
Endometrial cancer; Robotic; Laparoscopy; Survival; Cost; SURGICAL OUTCOMES; HYSTERECTOMY; LYMPHADENECTOMY; SURGERY; PROGRAM; SAFETY; OBESE; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.07.006
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To analyze the perioperative outcomes and cost of three surgical approaches in the treatment of endometrial cancer: robotic, laparoscopy and laparotomy. Study design: We studied 347 patients with endometrial cancer treated in a single institution: 71 patients were operated by robotics, 84 by conventional laparoscopy and 192 by laparotomy. All patients underwent total hysterectomy, bilateral salpingoophorectomy and pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy depending on the pathological features. Results: Operative time was longer in the laparoscopy group as compared to robotics and laparotomy (218.2 min, 189.2 min, and 157.4 min respectively, p = 0.000). The estimated blood loss was lower in the robotic group relative to the other groups (99.4 ml in robotic, 190.0 ml in laparoscopy and 231.5 ml in laparotomy, p = 0.000). Similar findings were observed for the pre- and post-operative mean hemoglobin levels (-1.3 g/dl, -2.3 g/dl and -2.5 g/dl respectively, p = 0.000), and transfusion rate (4.2%, 7.1% and 14.1% respectively, p = 0.036). The length of hospital stay was higher in the laparotomy group compared to robotics and laparoscopy (8.1, 3.5 and 4.6 days respectively; p = 0.000). The conversion rate to laparotomy was lower for robotics (2.4% for robotics and 8.1% for laparoscopy, p = 0.181). Overall complications were similar for robotics and laparoscopy (21.1%, 28.5%) (p = 0.079). Robotic complications were significantly lower as compared to laparotomy (21.2 vs 34.9% (p = 0.036). No differences were found relative to disease-free or overall survival among the three groups. The global costs were similar for the three approaches (p = 0.566). Conclusion: Robotics is a safe alternative to laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer patients, offering improved perioperative outcomes and similar cost as compared to the other two surgical approaches. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 294
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cost analysis of laparoscopy versus laparotomy for early endometrial cancer
    Scribner, DR
    Mannel, RS
    Walker, JL
    Johnson, GA
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1999, 75 (03) : 460 - 463
  • [22] Hysterectomy for Benign Uterine Pathology: Comparison Between Robotic Assisted Laparoscopy, Classic Laparoscopy and Laparotomy
    Saceanu, S.
    Cela, V.
    Surlin, V.
    Angelescu, C. M.
    Patrascu, S.
    Georgescu, I.
    Genazzani, A.
    CHIRURGIA, 2013, 108 (03) : 346 - 350
  • [23] Laparoscopy or laparotomy for early endometrial cancer?
    Carter, Jonathan
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2010, 11 (11): : 1021 - 1022
  • [24] Survival outcomes for robotic-assisted laparoscopy versus traditional laparoscopy in clinical stage I epithelial ovarian cancer
    Facer, Benjin
    Wang, Fei
    Grijalva, Carlos G.
    Alvarez, Ronald D.
    Shu, Xiao-Ou
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 222 (05) : 474.e1 - 474.e12
  • [25] COST EVALUATION OF CONVENTIONAL LAPAROSCOPY VS ROBOTIC-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPY IN GYN-ONCOLOGICAL INDICATIONS
    Lambaudie, E.
    Chereau-Ewald, E.
    Marino, P.
    Esterni, B.
    Boyer-Chammard, A.
    Jauffret, C.
    Orsoni, M.
    Houvenaeghel, G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2013, 23 (08)
  • [26] Robotic-assisted laparoscopy: general principles
    Hubert, J.
    ANNALES D UROLOGIE, 2007, 41 (06) : 298 - 305
  • [27] Robot-Assisted Staging Using Three Robotic Arms for Endometrial Cancer: Comparison to Laparoscopy and Laparotomy at a Single Institution
    Jung, Yong Wook
    Lee, Dae Woo
    Kim, Sang Wun
    Nam, Eun Ji
    Kim, Jae Hoon
    Kim, Jae Wook
    Kim, Young Tae
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 101 (02) : 116 - 121
  • [28] Comparison of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopy for transperitoneal infrarenal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in patients with endometrial cancer
    Lee, Hyun Jung
    Lee, Yoon Hee
    Chong, Gun Oh
    Hong, Dae Gy
    Lee, Yoon Soon
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2018, 44 (03) : 547 - 555
  • [29] Robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy and staging for the treatment of endometrial cancer: A comparison with conventional laparoscopy and abdominal approaches
    Estape R.
    Lambrou N.
    Estape E.
    Vega O.
    Ojea T.
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2012, 6 (3) : 199 - 205
  • [30] COMPARISON OF ROBOTIC-ASSISTED AND CONVENTIONAL LAPAROSCOPY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF ADNEXAL MASSES
    Elkhouly, N.
    Barr, R.
    Kim, B.
    Jeng, C.
    Nagarsheth, N.
    Fishman, D.
    Nezhat, F.
    Gretz, H.
    Chuang, L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2015, 25 (09) : 329 - 329