Commodity or competitive advantage? Analysis of the ERP value paradox

被引:16
|
作者
Hsu, Pei-Fang [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Tsing Hua Univ, Coll Technol Management, Inst Serv Sci, Hsinchu, Taiwan
关键词
B2B supply chain integration; Enterprise resources planning (ERP); Resource based view (RBV); IT value paradox; CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; SUPPLY CHAIN; FIRM PERFORMANCE; ENTERPRISE; IMPLEMENTATION; SYSTEMS; INTEGRATION; BUSINESS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.elerap.2013.06.004
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
A true e-business enabled firm needs the support from a well-tuned enterprise resource planning (ERP) system for providing real time data. However, many companies complain that after their huge investments in ERP systems, they found the ERP systems do not bring them new orders, new profits, or competitive advantage as ERP vendors claim. Academic studies also found mixed results regarding ERP's payoff. In line with resource based view (RBV), the study proposes an integrated model to shed light on the ERP value paradox. We try to answer "With what organizational resources and by building what firm specific capabilities, the investment in ERP systems may bring firms competitive advantage''. Using a sample of 150 ERP and e-business adopters in the US, we found that (1) organizational resources such as managerial skills and organizational change management play a more important role than IT resources (ERP, e-Business technologies) in generating business integration capability. (2) However, neither IT resources nor organizational resources directly provide firms with competitive advantage. Instead, business integration capability built from the two resources plays a mediating role through which business achieves competitive advantage. (C) 2013 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:412 / 424
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] From Temporary Competitive Advantage to Sustainable Competitive Advantage
    Huang, Kuo-Feng
    Dyerson, Romano
    Wu, Lei-Yu
    Harindranath, G.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2015, 26 (04) : 617 - 636
  • [42] Entrepreneurial orientation and competitive advantage: The mediation of resource value and rareness
    Lee, TingKo
    Chu, Wenyi
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, 2011, 5 (33): : 12797 - 12809
  • [43] Auto enterprises cultivate competitive advantage basing on Customer Value
    Xu Xiangnong
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2006, : 363 - 367
  • [44] The construction of technology innovation value chain based on competitive advantage
    Yang, Yang
    Zhang, Wensong
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2006 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2006, : 402 - 406
  • [45] Environmental Strategies, Upgrading and Competitive Advantage in Global Value Chains
    De Marchi, Valentina
    Di Maria, Eleonora
    Micelli, Stefano
    BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 22 (01) : 62 - 72
  • [46] Value creating and building of competitive advantage of tobacco industrial enterprises
    Hua, Chen
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT & THE 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON VALUE ENGINEERING, 2007, : 151 - 155
  • [47] Assessing Competitive Advantage Based on Customer Satisfaction and Customer Value
    Huang, Jinsong
    Zhou, Chenyang
    Han, Weiwei
    2013 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SERVICE SYSTEMS AND SERVICE MANAGEMENT (ICSSSM), 2013, : 12 - 17
  • [48] COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE AND PERFORMANCE: THE IMPACT OF VALUE CREATION AND COSTLINESS OF IMITATION
    Grahovac, Jovan
    Miller, Douglas J.
    STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2009, 30 (11) : 1192 - 1212
  • [49] Competitive Advantage in Alliance Governance: Resolving the Opportunism Minimization-Gain Maximization Paradox
    Hansen, Mark H.
    Hoskisson, Robert E.
    Barney, Jay B.
    MANAGERIAL AND DECISION ECONOMICS, 2008, 29 (2-3) : 191 - 208
  • [50] Organizational ambidexterity and competitive advantage: The role of strategic agility in the exploration-exploitation paradox
    Clauss, Thomas
    Kraus, Sascha
    Kallinger, Friedrich Lukas
    Bican, Peter M.
    Brem, Alexander
    Kailer, Norbert
    JOURNAL OF INNOVATION & KNOWLEDGE, 2020, 6 (04): : 203 - 213