The influence of the shared-display configuration on group decision making

被引:2
|
作者
Gao, Qin [1 ]
Chen, Xing [1 ]
Li, Zhizhong [1 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Group decision-making; Shared-display; User control; Decision aids; FACE-TO-FACE; COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION; INFORMATION EXCHANGE; SELF-EFFICACY; PERFORMANCE; TECHNOLOGY; SITUATION; STYLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ergon.2014.10.007
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Large shared displays are increasingly being used to support co-located group decision-making tasks. The expectation is that they can provide a shared visual reference and facilitate interaction between decision makers. This study examined the impact of shared-display configurations on group decision-making processes and outcomes. Three design factors were examined: submission control, display control, and presenting predictions on shared displays. Sixty-four participants performed an optimization task in groups of four members that were supported by different shared-display systems. The results show that submission control has a positive impact on the level of participation, the satisfaction with the group process, and the commitment to the decisions made, but it negatively influences the decision quality; presenting predictive information on the shared display, which is separated from the current information on the personal displays, has a negative impact on the group process and decision quality. In addition, the participants tend to always display all of the information that is available on the screen, in spite of the provision of the display control option. Relevance to industry: How group members can control the content on the shared displays and on their personal displays would influence the group behavior. Gained knowledge from this study is useful for designing and configuring shared-display systems for better group decision-making support. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 67
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Shared decision-making
    Berger, Abi
    BMJ SEXUAL & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2019, 45 (02) : 168 - 168
  • [42] On Trust and Shared Decision Making
    Wheelock, Alyse
    ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2019, 94 (06) : 751 - 751
  • [43] Shared Decision-Making
    Wright, Linda S.
    NEPHROLOGY NURSING JOURNAL, 2022, 49 (06) : 537 - 540
  • [44] Shared decision making for the allergist
    Blaiss, Michael S.
    Steven, Gary C.
    Bender, Bruce
    Bukstein, Don A.
    Meltzer, Eli O.
    Winders, Tonya
    ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 2019, 122 (05) : 463 - 470
  • [45] Shared decision making - Reply
    Deegan, Patricia E.
    Drake, Robert E.
    PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES, 2007, 58 (01) : 140 - 140
  • [46] The art of shared decision making
    Bingaman, Luke
    JAAPA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PHYSICIAN ASSISTANTS, 2023, 36 (02): : 31 - 34
  • [47] Shared decision-making
    Steven, K
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2001, 51 (462): : 61 - 62
  • [48] Shared decision making in the Geriatrics
    Heppner, Hans Juergen
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GERONTOLOGIE UND GERIATRIE, 2017, 50 : S3 - S3
  • [49] Shared Decision Making In Pediatrics
    Fiks, Alexander G.
    Noonan, Kathleen G.
    HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2013, 32 (04)
  • [50] Shared Decision Making in EoE
    Bredenoord, Albert J.
    Sauer, Bryan G.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2025, 120 (01): : 159 - 160