The influence of the shared-display configuration on group decision making

被引:2
|
作者
Gao, Qin [1 ]
Chen, Xing [1 ]
Li, Zhizhong [1 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Group decision-making; Shared-display; User control; Decision aids; FACE-TO-FACE; COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION; INFORMATION EXCHANGE; SELF-EFFICACY; PERFORMANCE; TECHNOLOGY; SITUATION; STYLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ergon.2014.10.007
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Large shared displays are increasingly being used to support co-located group decision-making tasks. The expectation is that they can provide a shared visual reference and facilitate interaction between decision makers. This study examined the impact of shared-display configurations on group decision-making processes and outcomes. Three design factors were examined: submission control, display control, and presenting predictions on shared displays. Sixty-four participants performed an optimization task in groups of four members that were supported by different shared-display systems. The results show that submission control has a positive impact on the level of participation, the satisfaction with the group process, and the commitment to the decisions made, but it negatively influences the decision quality; presenting predictive information on the shared display, which is separated from the current information on the personal displays, has a negative impact on the group process and decision quality. In addition, the participants tend to always display all of the information that is available on the screen, in spite of the provision of the display control option. Relevance to industry: How group members can control the content on the shared displays and on their personal displays would influence the group behavior. Gained knowledge from this study is useful for designing and configuring shared-display systems for better group decision-making support. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 67
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] PARTICIPATION, INFLUENCE, AND SATISFACTION IN GROUP DECISION MAKING
    WOOD, MT
    JOURNAL OF VOCATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 1972, 2 (04) : 389 - 399
  • [22] Influence and consensus in group decision making environment
    Nah, FH
    Kim, BC
    ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS PROCEEDING OF THE AMERICAS CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 1997, : 903 - 905
  • [23] Modelling Shared Decision Making Interactions using Influence Diagrams
    Yildirim, Zeliha
    Yet, Barbaros
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PROBABILISTIC GRAPHICAL MODELS, 2024, 246 : 133 - 146
  • [24] Shared decision making in medicine: The influence of situational treatment factors
    Mueller-Engelmann, Meike
    Keller, Heidi
    Donner-Banzhoff, Norbert
    Krones, Tanja
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2011, 82 (02) : 240 - 246
  • [25] Decision-making in nephrology: shared decision making?
    Lelie, A
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2000, 39 (01) : 81 - 89
  • [26] Enhancing Group Decision Making: An Exercise to Reduce Shared Information Bias
    Baker, Diane F.
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT EDUCATION, 2010, 34 (02) : 249 - 279
  • [27] Online Group Deliberation for the Elicitation of Shared Values to Underpin Decision Making
    Afshar, Faezeh
    Stranieri, Andrew
    Yearwood, John
    NEXT GENERATION INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES AND SYSTEMS, 2009, 5831 : 158 - 168
  • [28] PRODUCT CONFIGURATION DESIGN VIA GROUP DECISION MAKING AND COMBINATORIAL OPTIMIZATION
    Borissova, Daniela
    Keremedchiev, Delyan
    COMPTES RENDUS DE L ACADEMIE BULGARE DES SCIENCES, 2019, 72 (09): : 1251 - 1261
  • [29] Shared decision making with consumers
    Kim, Yongkyu
    ASIA-PACIFIC PSYCHIATRY, 2012, 4 : 78 - 79
  • [30] The limits of shared decision making
    Elwyn, Glyn
    Price, Amy
    Franco, Juan Victor Ariel
    Gulbrandsen, Pal
    BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE, 2023, 28 (04) : 218 - 221