Accuracy in contouring of small and low contrast lesions: Comparison between diagnostic quality computed tomography scanner and computed tomography simulation scanner-A phantom study

被引:2
|
作者
Ho, Yick Wing [1 ]
Wong, Wing Kei Rebecca [1 ]
Yu, Siu Ki [1 ]
Lam, Wai Wang [1 ]
Geng, Hui [1 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Sanat & Hosp, Med Phys & Res Dept, Happy Valley, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Computed tomography; Delineation accuracy; RADIOSURGERY; RADIOTHERAPY; DELINEATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.meddos.2012.03.002
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
To evaluate the accuracy in detection of small and low-contrast regions using a high-definition diagnostic computed tomography (CT) scanner compared with a radiotherapy CT simulation scanner. A custom-made phantom with cylindrical holes of diameters ranging from 2-9 mm was filled with 9 different concentrations of contrast solution. The phantom was scanned using a 16-slice multidetector CT simulation scanner (LightSpeed RT16, General Electric Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI) and a 64-slice high-definition diagnostic CT scanner (Discovery CT750 HD, General Electric Healthcare). The low-contrast regions of interest (ROIs) were delineated automatically upon their full width at half maximum of the CT number profile in Hounsfield units on a treatment planning workstation. Two conformal indexes, CIin, and CIout, were calculated to represent the percentage errors of underestimation and overestimation in the automated contours compared with their actual sizes. Summarizing the conformal indexes of different sizes and contrast concentration, the means of CIin, and CIout for the CT simulation scanner were 33.7% and 60.9%, respectively, and 10.5% and 41.5% were found for the diagnostic CT scanner. The mean differences between the 2 scanners' CIin, and CIout were shown to be significant with p < 0.001. A descending trend of the index values was observed as the ROI size increases for both scanners, which indicates an improved accuracy when the ROI size increases, whereas no observable trend was found in the contouring accuracy with respect to the contrast levels in this study. Images acquired by the diagnostic CT scanner allow higher accuracy on size estimation compared with the CT simulation scanner in this study. We recommend using a diagnostic CT scanner to scan patients with small lesions (<1 cm in diameter) for radiotherapy treatment planning, especially for those pending for stereotactic radiosurgery in which accurate delineation of small-sized, low-contrast regions is important for dose calculation. (C) 2012 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.
引用
收藏
页码:401 / 405
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] ACCURACY IN CONTOURING OF SMALL AND LOW CONTRAST LESIONS: COMPARISON BETWEEN DIAGNOSTIC QUALITY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER AND COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SIMULATION SCANNER A PHANTOM STUDY
    Wong, W. K. R.
    Ho, Y. W.
    Yu, S. K.
    Lam, W. W.
    Geng, H.
    Liu, S. F.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2010, 96 : S382 - S382
  • [2] Comparison of Optical Scanner and Computed Tomography Scan Accuracy
    Kritikos, Michaela
    Urminsky, Jan
    Buransky, Ivan
    DIGITIZING PRODUCTION SYSTEMS, ISPR2021, 2022, : 521 - 530
  • [3] Simulation of Hounsfield units for a Computed Tomography scanner and different phantom inserts
    Wysocka-Rabin, A.
    Qamhiyeh, S.
    Jakel, O.
    EUROCON 2007: THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER AS A TOOL, VOLS 1-6, 2007, : 1532 - 1537
  • [4] A comparative study for image quality and radiation dose of a cone beam computed tomography scanner and a multislice computed tomography scanner for paranasal sinus imaging
    De Cock, Jens
    Zanca, Federica
    Canning, John
    Pauwels, Ruben
    Hermans, Robert
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2015, 25 (07) : 1891 - 1900
  • [5] A comparative study for image quality and radiation dose of a cone beam computed tomography scanner and a multislice computed tomography scanner for paranasal sinus imaging
    Jens De Cock
    Federica Zanca
    John Canning
    Ruben Pauwels
    Robert Hermans
    European Radiology, 2015, 25 : 1891 - 1900
  • [6] Comparison of Reproducibility of Manual and Automated Prostate Contouring Using Kilovoltage Cone Beam Computed Tomography and Diagnostic Quality Computed Tomography
    Olsen, L. J. Sheplan
    Godley, A.
    Zhao, A.
    Vassil, A.
    Xia, P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 84 (03): : S749 - S750
  • [7] Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography coronary angiography for evaluation of coronary artery disease: a comparison between high definition versus standard definition scanner
    Pontone, G.
    Andreini, D.
    Bertella, E.
    Mushtaq, S.
    Loguercio, M.
    Cortinovis, S.
    Baggiano, A.
    Conte, E.
    Annoni, A.
    Pepi, M.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2013, 34 : 520 - 521
  • [8] QUANTITATIVE COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY OF THE BRAIN WITH XENON ENHANCEMENT - A PHANTOM STUDY WITH THE GE9800 SCANNER
    LEE, TY
    ELLIS, RJ
    DUNSCOMBE, PB
    MCCLARTY, B
    HODSON, DI
    KROEKER, MA
    BEWS, J
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1990, 35 (07): : 925 - 935
  • [9] Precision of quantitative computed tomography texture analysis using image filtering A phantom study for scanner variability
    Yasaka, Koichiro
    Akai, Hiroyuki
    Mackin, Dennis
    Court, Laurence
    Moros, Eduardo
    Ohtomo, Kuni
    Kiryu, Shigeru
    MEDICINE, 2017, 96 (21)
  • [10] Accuracy comparison of a 16 and 64 multidetector-row computed tomography scanner to image small high-density structures
    Rollano-Hijarrubia, Empar
    Stokking, Rik
    Niessen, Wiro J.
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2006, 41 (11) : 781 - 792