Reduced Circumferential Resection Margin Involvement in Rectal Cancer Surgery: Results of the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit

被引:18
|
作者
Gietelink, Lieke [1 ]
Wouters, Michel W. J. M. [1 ,2 ]
Tanis, Pieter J. [3 ]
Deken, Marion M. [4 ]
ten Berge, Martijn G. [1 ]
Tollenaar, Rob A. E. M. [1 ]
van Krieken, J. Han [5 ]
de Noo, Mirre E. [4 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Dept Surg, Med Ctr, NL-2333 ZA Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Netherlands Canc Inst Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Dept Surg Oncol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Surg, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Deventer Hosp, Dept Surg, Deventer, Netherlands
[5] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dept Pathol, Med Ctr, NL-6525 ED Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; PREOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY; LOCAL RECURRENCE; PROGNOSTIC-FACTOR; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; MRC CR07; QUALITY; TME; MULTICENTER; IMPROVEMENT;
D O I
10.6004/jnccn.2015.0136
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The circumferential resection margin (CRM) is a significant prognostic factor for local recurrence, distant metastasis, and survival after rectal cancer surgery. Therefore, availability of this parameter is essential. Although the Dutch total mesorectal excision trial raised awareness about CRM in the late 1990s, quality assurance on pathologic reporting was not available until the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit (DSCA) started in 2009. The present study describes the rates of CRM reporting and involvement since the start of the DSCA and analyzes whether improvement of these parameters can be attributed to the audit. Methods: Data from the DSCA (2009-2013) were analyzed. Reporting of CRM and CRM involvement was plotted for successive years, and variations of these parameters were analyzed in a funnelplot. Predictors of CRM involvement were determined in univariable analysis and the independent influence of year of registration on CRM involvement was analyzed in multivariable analysis. Results: A total of 12,669 patients were included for analysis. The mean percentage of patients with a reported CRM increased from 52.7% to 94.2% (2009-2013) and interhospital variation decreased. The percentage of patients with CRM involvement decreased from 14.2% to 5.6%. In multivariable analysis, the year of DSCA registration remained a significant predictor of CRM involvement. Conclusions: After the introduction of the DSCA, a dramatic improvement in CRM reporting and a major decrease of CRM involvement after rectal cancer surgery have occurred. This study suggests that a national quality assurance program has been the driving force behind these achievements.
引用
收藏
页码:1111 / 1119
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] DEVELOPMENT OF A PREDICTIVE NOMOGRAM FOR CIRCUMFERENTIAL RESECTION MARGIN IN RECTAL CANCER SURGERY.
    Shroder, M.
    Hawkins, A.
    Ye, F.
    Zhao, Z.
    Khan, A.
    McChesney, S.
    Ford, M.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2022, 65 (05) : 212 - 212
  • [22] PREDICTORS OF POSITIVE CIRCUMFERENTIAL RESECTION MARGIN IN RECTAL CANCER: A CURRENT AUDIT OF THE NATIONAL CANCER DATABASE (NCBD).
    Simon, H. L.
    Kiran, R. P.
    de Paula, T. Reif
    Profeta, M.
    Keller, D. S.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2020, 63 (06) : E356 - E356
  • [23] Circumferential resection margin assessment on MRI of rectal cancer
    Petroudi, Styliani
    Brown, Gina
    Bond, Sarah
    Brady, Michael
    2006 28TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOLS 1-15, 2006, : 3851 - +
  • [24] Circumferential resection margin as a prognostic factor in rectal cancer
    Bernstein, T. E.
    Endreseth, B. H.
    Romundstad, P.
    Wibe, A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 96 (11) : 1348 - 1357
  • [25] The prognostic significance of the circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer
    Wibe, A
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2001, 120 (05) : A473 - A473
  • [26] Hospital Variation in Failure to Rescue after Colorectal Cancer Surgery: Results of the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit
    Henneman, D.
    Snijders, H. S.
    Fiocco, M.
    van Leersum, N. J.
    Kolfschoten, N. E.
    Wiggers, Th
    Wouters, M. W. J. M.
    Tollenaar, R. A. E. M.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 20 (07) : 2117 - 2123
  • [27] Hospital Variation in Failure to Rescue after Colorectal Cancer Surgery: Results of the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit
    D. Henneman
    H. S. Snijders
    M. Fiocco
    N. J. van Leersum
    N. E. Kolfschoten
    Th. Wiggers
    M. W. J. M. Wouters
    R. A. E. M. Tollenaar
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2013, 20 : 2117 - 2123
  • [28] Factors influencing circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer
    Hiranyakas, A.
    da Silva, G.
    Wexner, S. D.
    Ho, Y. -H.
    Allende, D.
    Berho, M.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2013, 15 (03) : 298 - 303
  • [29] IMPLICATION OF CIRCUMFERENTIAL RESECTION MARGIN IN INTERSPHINCTERIC RESECTION OF LOW RECTAL CANCER
    Choi, G.
    Kim, H.
    Park, J.
    Park, S.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2016, 59 (05) : E268 - E268
  • [30] Circumferential resection margin involvement: an independent predictor of survival following surgery for oesophageal cancer
    Dexter, SPL
    Sue-Ling, H
    McMahon, MJ
    Quirke, P
    Mapstone, N
    Martin, IG
    GUT, 2001, 48 (05) : 667 - 670