Reduced Circumferential Resection Margin Involvement in Rectal Cancer Surgery: Results of the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit

被引:18
|
作者
Gietelink, Lieke [1 ]
Wouters, Michel W. J. M. [1 ,2 ]
Tanis, Pieter J. [3 ]
Deken, Marion M. [4 ]
ten Berge, Martijn G. [1 ]
Tollenaar, Rob A. E. M. [1 ]
van Krieken, J. Han [5 ]
de Noo, Mirre E. [4 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Dept Surg, Med Ctr, NL-2333 ZA Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Netherlands Canc Inst Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Dept Surg Oncol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Surg, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Deventer Hosp, Dept Surg, Deventer, Netherlands
[5] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dept Pathol, Med Ctr, NL-6525 ED Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; PREOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY; LOCAL RECURRENCE; PROGNOSTIC-FACTOR; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; MRC CR07; QUALITY; TME; MULTICENTER; IMPROVEMENT;
D O I
10.6004/jnccn.2015.0136
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The circumferential resection margin (CRM) is a significant prognostic factor for local recurrence, distant metastasis, and survival after rectal cancer surgery. Therefore, availability of this parameter is essential. Although the Dutch total mesorectal excision trial raised awareness about CRM in the late 1990s, quality assurance on pathologic reporting was not available until the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit (DSCA) started in 2009. The present study describes the rates of CRM reporting and involvement since the start of the DSCA and analyzes whether improvement of these parameters can be attributed to the audit. Methods: Data from the DSCA (2009-2013) were analyzed. Reporting of CRM and CRM involvement was plotted for successive years, and variations of these parameters were analyzed in a funnelplot. Predictors of CRM involvement were determined in univariable analysis and the independent influence of year of registration on CRM involvement was analyzed in multivariable analysis. Results: A total of 12,669 patients were included for analysis. The mean percentage of patients with a reported CRM increased from 52.7% to 94.2% (2009-2013) and interhospital variation decreased. The percentage of patients with CRM involvement decreased from 14.2% to 5.6%. In multivariable analysis, the year of DSCA registration remained a significant predictor of CRM involvement. Conclusions: After the introduction of the DSCA, a dramatic improvement in CRM reporting and a major decrease of CRM involvement after rectal cancer surgery have occurred. This study suggests that a national quality assurance program has been the driving force behind these achievements.
引用
收藏
页码:1111 / 1119
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Factors affecting circumferential resection margin involvement after rectal cancer excision
    Tilney, Henry S.
    Tekkis, Paris P.
    Sains, Parvinder S.
    Constantinides, Vasilis A.
    Heriot, Alexander G.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2007, 50 (01) : 29 - 36
  • [12] The Prognostic Value of Circumferential Resection Margin Involvement in Patients with Extraperitoneal Rectal Cancer
    Shin, Dong Woo
    Shin, Jin Yong
    Oh, Sung Jin
    Park, Jong Kwon
    Yu, Hyeon
    Ahn, Min Sung
    Bae, Ki Beom
    Hong, Kwan Hee
    Ji, Yong Il
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2016, 82 (04) : 348 - 355
  • [13] THE IMPACT OF CIRCUMFERENTIAL RESECTION MARGIN INVOLVEMENT IN STAGE III RECTAL CANCER.
    Kang, J.
    Hur, H.
    Min, B.
    Lee, K.
    Kim, N.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2011, 54 (05) : E153 - E153
  • [14] Occurrence and prognostic value of circumferential resection margin involvement for patients with rectal cancer
    Wang, Cun
    Zhou, Zong-guang
    Yu, Yong-yang
    Shu, Ye
    Li, Yuan
    Yang, Lie
    Li, Li
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2009, 24 (04) : 385 - 390
  • [15] Circumferential resection margin involvement after laparoscopic abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer
    Raftopoulos, I.
    Reed, J. F., III
    Bergamaschi, R.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2012, 14 (04) : 431 - 437
  • [16] Circumferential resection margin and quality of the operation in rectal cancer surgery importance of rectal fascia
    Dardanov, D.
    Betova, T.
    Kovachev, N.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2008, 19 : I47 - I47
  • [17] Risk factors of circumferential resection margin involvement in the patients with extraperitoneal rectal cancer
    Oh, Sung Jin
    Shin, Jin Yong
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN SURGICAL SOCIETY, 2012, 82 (03): : 165 - 171
  • [18] Occurrence and prognostic value of circumferential resection margin involvement for patients with rectal cancer
    Cun Wang
    Zong-guang Zhou
    Yong-yang Yu
    Ye Shu
    Yuan Li
    Lie Yang
    Li Li
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2009, 24 : 385 - 390
  • [19] Predictors of Positive Circumferential Resection Margin in Rectal Cancer: A Current Audit of the National Cancer Database
    Simon, Hillary L.
    de Paula, Thais Reif
    Profeta da Luz, Magda M.
    Kiran, Ravi P.
    Keller, Deborah S.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2021, 64 (09) : 1096 - 1105
  • [20] Circumferential Resection Margin as a Hospital Quality Assessment Tool for Rectal Cancer Surgery
    Patel, Sameer H.
    Hu, Chung-Yuan
    Massarweh, Nader N.
    You, Y. Nancy
    McCabe, Ryan
    Dietz, David
    Facktor, Matthew A.
    Chang, George J.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2020, 230 (06) : 1008 - +