Reduced Circumferential Resection Margin Involvement in Rectal Cancer Surgery: Results of the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit

被引:19
|
作者
Gietelink, Lieke [1 ]
Wouters, Michel W. J. M. [1 ,2 ]
Tanis, Pieter J. [3 ]
Deken, Marion M. [4 ]
ten Berge, Martijn G. [1 ]
Tollenaar, Rob A. E. M. [1 ]
van Krieken, J. Han [5 ]
de Noo, Mirre E. [4 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Dept Surg, Med Ctr, NL-2333 ZA Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Netherlands Canc Inst Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Dept Surg Oncol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Surg, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Deventer Hosp, Dept Surg, Deventer, Netherlands
[5] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dept Pathol, Med Ctr, NL-6525 ED Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; PREOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY; LOCAL RECURRENCE; PROGNOSTIC-FACTOR; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; MRC CR07; QUALITY; TME; MULTICENTER; IMPROVEMENT;
D O I
10.6004/jnccn.2015.0136
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The circumferential resection margin (CRM) is a significant prognostic factor for local recurrence, distant metastasis, and survival after rectal cancer surgery. Therefore, availability of this parameter is essential. Although the Dutch total mesorectal excision trial raised awareness about CRM in the late 1990s, quality assurance on pathologic reporting was not available until the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit (DSCA) started in 2009. The present study describes the rates of CRM reporting and involvement since the start of the DSCA and analyzes whether improvement of these parameters can be attributed to the audit. Methods: Data from the DSCA (2009-2013) were analyzed. Reporting of CRM and CRM involvement was plotted for successive years, and variations of these parameters were analyzed in a funnelplot. Predictors of CRM involvement were determined in univariable analysis and the independent influence of year of registration on CRM involvement was analyzed in multivariable analysis. Results: A total of 12,669 patients were included for analysis. The mean percentage of patients with a reported CRM increased from 52.7% to 94.2% (2009-2013) and interhospital variation decreased. The percentage of patients with CRM involvement decreased from 14.2% to 5.6%. In multivariable analysis, the year of DSCA registration remained a significant predictor of CRM involvement. Conclusions: After the introduction of the DSCA, a dramatic improvement in CRM reporting and a major decrease of CRM involvement after rectal cancer surgery have occurred. This study suggests that a national quality assurance program has been the driving force behind these achievements.
引用
收藏
页码:1111 / 1119
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Influence of Hospital Volume on Circumferential Resection Margin Involvement: Results of the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit
    Gietelink, Lieke
    Henneman, Daniel
    van Leersum, Nicoline J.
    de Noo, Mirre
    Manusama, Eric
    Tanis, Pieter J.
    Tollenaar, Rob A. E. M.
    Wouters, Michel W. J. M.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2016, 263 (04) : 745 - 750
  • [2] Predictors of Circumferential Resection Margin Involvement after Curative Surgery for Rectal Cancer
    Al-Sukhni, E.
    Attwood, K.
    Gabriel, E.
    Nurkin, S. J.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 22 : S80 - S80
  • [3] Investigation of circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer surgery
    Dardanov, D.
    Betova, T.
    Deliyski, T.
    JOURNAL OF BUON, 2007, 12 (03): : 369 - 376
  • [4] Reporting of Circumferential Resection Margin in Rectal Cancer Surgery
    Manisundaram, Naveen
    Dibrito, Sandra R.
    Hu, Chung-Yuan
    Kim, Youngwan
    Wick, Elizabeth
    Palis, Bryan
    Peacock, Oliver
    Chang, George J.
    JAMA SURGERY, 2023, 158 (11) : 1195 - 1202
  • [5] The relationship between pelvic morphology and involvement of the circumferential resection margin in surgery for rectal cancer
    Boyle, K
    Petty, D
    Chalmers, A
    Quirke, P
    Finan, P
    Sagar, P
    Burke, D
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2004, 91 : 95 - 95
  • [6] The circumferential resection margin in rectal carcinoma surgery
    Hermanek P.
    Junginger T.
    Techniques in Coloproctology, 2005, 9 (3) : 193 - 200
  • [7] PREOPERATIVE ASSESSMENT OF CIRCUMFERENTIAL RESECTION MARGIN INVOLVEMENT IN RECTAL CANCER USING MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING: CAN PERINODAL EXTENSION BE DEFINED AS CIRCUMFERENTIAL RESECTION MARGIN INVOLVEMENT IN RECTAL CANCER?
    Cheong, C.
    Park, Y.
    Han, Y.
    Cho, M.
    Hur, H.
    Min, B.
    Kim, N.
    Lee, K.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2017, 60 (06) : E501 - E501
  • [8] Rates of circumferential resection margin involvement vary between surgeons and predict outcomes in rectal cancer surgery
    Birbeck, KF
    Macklin, CP
    Tiffin, NJ
    Parsons, W
    Dixon, MF
    Mapstone, NP
    Abbott, CR
    Scott, N
    Finan, PJ
    Johnston, D
    Quirke, P
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2002, 235 (04) : 449 - 457
  • [9] Effect of the circumferential resection margin on survival following rectal cancer surgery
    Kelly, S. B.
    Mills, S. J.
    Bradburn, D. M.
    Ratcliffe, A. A.
    Borowski, D. W.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 98 (04) : 573 - 581
  • [10] Development of a Predictive Nomogram for Circumferential Resection Margin in Rectal Cancer Surgery
    Shroder, Megan
    Ford, Molly M.
    Ye, Fei
    Zhiguo, Zhao
    Khan, Aimal
    Mcchesney, Shannon
    Hopkins, Benjamin
    Hawkins, Alexander T.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2024, 296 : 532 - 540