Downstream economic benefits of conservation development

被引:13
|
作者
Johnston, DM
Braden, JB
Price, TH
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Landscape Architecture, Champaign, IL 61820 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Dept Agr & Consumer Econ, Champaign, IL 61820 USA
[3] Conservat Design Forum, Elmhurst, IL 60126 USA
关键词
Damage; Drainage; Economic factors; Floods; Infrastructure; Runoff; Stormwater management; Urban areas;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2006)132:1(35)
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This paper evaluates the downstream hydrologic and economic impacts of development strategies that promote greater on-site storage of storm water. This paper applies a methodology to a specific case study that emphasizes flood risk reduction and drainage infrastructure. The estimates are at a first level of approximation. We use widely accepted simulation models and available data to compare alternative development scenarios for the 0.01 annual probability storm event. For a watershed in a rapidly developing area near Chicago, Ill., reduced downstream flooding with the employment of conservation design practices generates from $0 to 19,400/ha ($0-7,800/acre) in downstream property value benefits over all affected areas. For comparison purposes, flood-damage estimation methods generate an average of $16,800-$24,200/ha ($6,700-$9,700/acres present value reduction in damages for the 0.01 probability flood event alone. The two methods yield conservative, but mutually reinforcing estimates. For infrastructure benefits, considering only downstream road culverts, the use of conservation design techniques upstream avoids $3.3 million in costs of culvert replacement or upgrades. The sum of the downstream flood mitigation and infrastructure benefits amounts to $920-1,440/developed hectares ($380-590/developed acres) following conservation design practices.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 43
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Economic development and the conservation of large carnivores
    Rasker, R
    Hackman, A
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 1996, 10 (04) : 991 - 1002
  • [22] IGUANA CONSERVATION AND ECONOMIC-DEVELOPMENT
    COHN, JP
    BIOSCIENCE, 1989, 39 (06) : 359 - 363
  • [23] Public and private economic benefits of adopting conservation tillage for cotton pollination
    Cusser, Sarah
    Jha, Shalene
    Lonsdorf, Eric
    Ricketts, Taylor
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 342
  • [24] Effects of initial aquifer conditions on economic benefits from groundwater conservation
    Foster, T.
    Brozovic, N.
    Butler, A. P.
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2017, 53 (01) : 744 - 762
  • [25] Determining the economic costs and benefits of conservation actions: A decision support framework
    White, Thomas B.
    Petrovan, Silviu O.
    Booth, Hollie
    Correa, Roberto J.
    Gatt, Yasmine
    Martin, Philip A.
    Newell, Helena
    Worthington, Thomas A.
    Sutherland, William J.
    CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2022, 4 (12)
  • [26] Economic benefits of biodiversity exceed costs of conservation at an African rainforest reserve
    Naidoo, R
    Adamowicz, WL
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2005, 102 (46) : 16712 - 16716
  • [27] ECONOMIC BENEFITS FROM EARLY DEVELOPMENT OF FUSION
    BROOKS, WA
    SANDERS, RC
    CONRAD, CP
    GROWTH AND CHANGE, 1978, 9 (04) : 22 - 29
  • [28] DISTRIBUTING THE BENEFITS OF REGIONAL ECONOMIC-DEVELOPMENT
    DANIELSON, MN
    WOLPERT, J
    URBAN STUDIES, 1991, 28 (03) : 393 - 413
  • [29] A study on the economic benefits in development of freshwater farming
    Yu Jian-ping
    Yao Xian-guo
    Fang Xiao-yan
    Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A, 2001, 2 (3): : 338 - 341
  • [30] A STUDY ON THE ECONOMIC BENEFITS IN DEVELOPMENT OF FRESHWATER FARMING
    俞剑平
    姚先国
    方小燕
    JournalofZhejiangUniversityScience, 2001, (03) : 99 - 102