Downstream economic benefits of conservation development

被引:13
|
作者
Johnston, DM
Braden, JB
Price, TH
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Landscape Architecture, Champaign, IL 61820 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Dept Agr & Consumer Econ, Champaign, IL 61820 USA
[3] Conservat Design Forum, Elmhurst, IL 60126 USA
关键词
Damage; Drainage; Economic factors; Floods; Infrastructure; Runoff; Stormwater management; Urban areas;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2006)132:1(35)
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This paper evaluates the downstream hydrologic and economic impacts of development strategies that promote greater on-site storage of storm water. This paper applies a methodology to a specific case study that emphasizes flood risk reduction and drainage infrastructure. The estimates are at a first level of approximation. We use widely accepted simulation models and available data to compare alternative development scenarios for the 0.01 annual probability storm event. For a watershed in a rapidly developing area near Chicago, Ill., reduced downstream flooding with the employment of conservation design practices generates from $0 to 19,400/ha ($0-7,800/acre) in downstream property value benefits over all affected areas. For comparison purposes, flood-damage estimation methods generate an average of $16,800-$24,200/ha ($6,700-$9,700/acres present value reduction in damages for the 0.01 probability flood event alone. The two methods yield conservative, but mutually reinforcing estimates. For infrastructure benefits, considering only downstream road culverts, the use of conservation design techniques upstream avoids $3.3 million in costs of culvert replacement or upgrades. The sum of the downstream flood mitigation and infrastructure benefits amounts to $920-1,440/developed hectares ($380-590/developed acres) following conservation design practices.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 43
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Marine Economic Development and Conservation
    Wang, Shuhong
    Xu, Sheng
    WATER, 2023, 15 (12)
  • [12] THE DOWNSTREAM BENEFITS OF SOIL CONSERVATION IN 3RD-WORLD HYDROELECTRIC WATERSHEDS
    SOUTHGATE, D
    MACKE, R
    LAND ECONOMICS, 1989, 65 (01) : 38 - 48
  • [13] ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECONOMIC COSTS OF SOIL EROSION AND CONSERVATION BENEFITS
    PIMENTEL, D
    HARVEY, C
    RESOSUDARMO, P
    SINCLAIR, K
    KURZ, D
    MCNAIR, M
    CRIST, S
    SHPRITZ, L
    FITTON, L
    SAFFOURI, R
    BLAIR, R
    SCIENCE, 1995, 267 (5201) : 1117 - 1123
  • [14] Securing economic benefits and promoting conservation through bioprospecting
    Kursar, Thomas A.
    Caballero-George, Catherina C.
    Capson, Todd L.
    Cubilla-Rios, Luis
    Gerwick, William H.
    Gupta, Mahabir P.
    Ibanez, Alicia
    Linington, Roger G.
    McPhail, Kerry L.
    Ortega-Barria, Eduardo
    Romero, Luz I.
    Solis, Pablo N.
    Coley, Phyllis D.
    BIOSCIENCE, 2006, 56 (12) : 1005 - 1012
  • [15] Effects of reservoir operation methods on downstream ecological disturbance and economic benefits
    Liu, Hongrui
    Yin, Xin-An
    Xu, Zhihao
    Cai, Yanpeng
    Yang, Wei
    RIVER RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2019, 35 (07) : 955 - 965
  • [16] Economic benefits of spending on space development
    Aliyeva, Khadija
    Proceedings of the International Astronautical Congress, IAC, 2023, 2023-October
  • [17] Health investment benefits economic development
    Suhrcke, Marc
    McKee, Martin
    Rocco, Lorenzo
    LANCET, 2007, 370 (9597): : 1467 - 1468
  • [18] The economic valuation of Gedo Natural Forest conservation benefits, Ethiopia
    Tolera T.
    Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 11 (1)
  • [19] Biomass management targets and the conservation and economic benefits of marine reserves
    Yamazaki, Satoshi
    Grafton, Quentin R.
    Kompas, Tom
    Jennings, Sarah
    FISH AND FISHERIES, 2014, 15 (02) : 196 - 208
  • [20] THE POTENTIAL ECONOMIC-BENEFITS OF ENERGY-CONSERVATION RESEARCH
    PINE, GD
    OLSZEWSKI, M
    ENERGY, 1985, 10 (07) : 843 - 849