Check-in/Check-out Implementation in Schools: a Meta-Analysis of Group Design Studies

被引:7
|
作者
Park, Eun-Young [1 ]
Blair, Kwang-Sun Cho [2 ]
机构
[1] Jeonju Univ, Dept Secondary Special Educ, Coll Educ, 303 Cheonjam Ro, Jeonbuk 55069, South Korea
[2] Univ S Florida, Dept Child & Family Studies, Coll Behav & Community Sci, 13301 Bruce B Downs Blvd, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
关键词
Check-in; check-out; Behavior education program; Tier; 2; Group design; Meta-analysis; POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT; TIER; 2; INTERVENTIONS; GROUP CONTINGENCY INTERVENTIONS; AT-RISK; ELEMENTARY; STUDENTS; FIDELITY; PROGRAM; STEP;
D O I
10.1007/s43494-020-00030-2
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
This meta-analysis study synthesized the intervention effects of Check-in/Check-out (CICO), the most common Tier 2 behavior intervention used in schools. Systematic review procedures were employed to examine six CICO studies that were evaluated using a group research design and that involved 146 students. Studies were coded to examine their characteristics as well as quality indicators concerning their design features. The results indicated that in group design studies, the overall effect size of CICO across student outcomes (problem behavior, appropriate behavior, social skills, and academic performance) was medium (g = 0.42). No differences in effects were found for outcome domains, Tier 1 fidelity, and implementation fidelity, but grade level was associated with statistically significant differences in effect sizes (Q = 3.95,p < .05). Elementary school students (g = 0.70) showed greater improvements than middle school students (g = 0.27). Further research is needed to examine the intervention features impacting the effects of CICO.
引用
收藏
页码:361 / 375
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] A Systematic Review of the Empirical Support for Check-In Check-Out
    Wolfe, Katie
    Pyle, Daniel
    Charlton, Cade T.
    Sabey, Christian V.
    Lund, Emily M.
    Ross, Scott W.
    JOURNAL OF POSITIVE BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS, 2016, 18 (02) : 74 - 88
  • [12] Positive Behavior Support Program Throughout The Classroom: The Implementation of The Check-In/Check-Out Program
    Atbasi, Zehra
    Karasu, Necdet
    Tavil, Yusuf Ziya
    EGITIM VE BILIM-EDUCATION AND SCIENCE, 2019, 44 (197): : 139 - 154
  • [13] A Daily Check-In/Check-Out Intervention for Students with Internalizing Concerns
    Mitchell, Barbara S.
    Lewis, Timothy J.
    Stormont, Melissa
    JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL EDUCATION, 2021, 30 (02) : 178 - 201
  • [14] Using a Biometric System to Check-in and Check-out Luggage at Airports
    Hans, Robert T.
    2014 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BIOMETRICS AND SECURITY TECHNOLOGIES (ISBAST), 2014, : 63 - 66
  • [15] A Daily Check-In/Check-Out Intervention for Students with Internalizing Concerns
    Barbara S. Mitchell
    Timothy J. Lewis
    Melissa Stormont
    Journal of Behavioral Education, 2021, 30 : 178 - 201
  • [16] A Systematic Review of Function-Modified Check-In/Check-Out
    Klingbeil, David A.
    Dart, Evan H.
    Schramm, Amber L.
    JOURNAL OF POSITIVE BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS, 2019, 21 (02) : 77 - 92
  • [17] The Effects of Check-In/Check-Out on Kindergarten Students in an Urban Setting
    Adriana Sobalvarro
    Scott L. Graves
    Tammy Hughes
    Contemporary School Psychology, 2016, 20 (1) : 84 - 92
  • [18] Examining the Additive Effects of Check-in/Check-out to Coping Power
    McDaniel, Sara C.
    Bruhn, Allison L.
    ELEMENTARY SCHOOL JOURNAL, 2019, 119 (04): : 580 - 600
  • [19] Innovating the Check-In, Check-Out Intervention: A Process for Creating Adaptations
    Bundock, Kaitlin
    Hawken, Leanne S.
    Kladis, Kristin
    Breen, Kimberli
    INTERVENTION IN SCHOOL AND CLINIC, 2020, 55 (03) : 169 - 177
  • [20] Are Breaks Better? A Comparison of Breaks Are Better to Check-In Check-Out
    Majeika, Caitlyn E.
    Wehby, Joseph H.
    Hancock, Eleanor M.
    BEHAVIORAL DISORDERS, 2022, 47 (02) : 118 - 133