Procedure-Related Complications after Genetic Amniocentesis and Chorionic Villus Sampling

被引:19
|
作者
Kollmann, M. [1 ]
Haeusler, M. [1 ]
Haas, J. [1 ]
Csapo, B. [1 ]
Lang, U. [1 ]
Klaritsch, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Graz, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, A-8036 Graz, Austria
来源
ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN | 2013年 / 34卷 / 04期
关键词
obstetrcis; pregnancy; amniocentesis; chorionic villus; sampling; FETAL LOSS RATE; PRENATAL-DIAGNOSIS; HYPERTENSIVE DISORDERS; LOSS RATES; RISK; TRISOMY-21; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1055/s-0032-1312939
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Purpose: Amniocentesis (AC) and chorionic villus sampling (CVS) play an important role in the diagnosis of genetic anomalies. The aim of this study was to evaluate presentable numbers of procedure-related complications of genetic interventions in a tertiary referral hospital. Materials and Methods: The pregnancy outcome of women who underwent genetic AC or CVS during 2003-2010 at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Graz, Austria, was analyzed retrospectively. The primary outcome was miscarriage or membrane rupture after an invasive procedure. Only singleton gestations were included. Results: 1,569 AC procedures and 334 CVS procedures (234 transabdominal, 99 transcervical, 1 with undocumented route) were performed. Of these, 57 cases were excluded from further analysis because of severe anomalies. Complete outcome data were available for 93.17 % of cases. In 164 (8.89 %) cases the pregnancy was terminated due to genetic anomalies or severe malformations. In the remaining collective 10 of 1,342 (0.75 %) AC procedures, 3 of 150 (2.00 %) transabdominal CVS procedures and 2 of 64 (3.13 %) transcervical CVS procedures lead to complications resulting in miscarriage <24 weeks (n = 13) or rupture of membranes (n = 2) within 2 weeks after procedure. Complication rates were significantly higher after CVS than after AC (OR 3.19). Conclusion: Over an observation period of seven years, the complication rates after AC, transabdominal CVS and transcervical CVS were 0.75 %, 2.00 % and 3.13 %, respectively. These results are comparable to recent international investigations.
引用
收藏
页码:345 / 348
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Audit of amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling service
    McDonnell, S.
    Peregrine, E.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2015, 122 : 24 - 24
  • [32] Early amniocentesis versus chorionic villus sampling
    Eiben, B
    Hammans, W
    Trawicki, W
    Goebel, R
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 1998, 18 (04) : 405 - 406
  • [33] DEGUM Guidelines for Amniocentesis and Chorionic Villus Sampling
    Kaehler, C.
    Gembruch, U.
    Heling, K-S
    Henrich, W.
    Schramm, T.
    ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN, 2013, 34 (05): : 435 - 440
  • [34] Amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling for prenatal diagnosis
    Alfirevic, Zarko
    Navaratnam, Kate
    Mujezinovic, Faris
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2017, (09):
  • [35] CHORIONIC VILLUS SAMPLING VERSUS AMNIOCENTESIS - REPLY
    HAMERTON, JL
    LANCET, 1989, 1 (8639): : 678 - 678
  • [36] Chorionic villus sampling versus early amniocentesis
    Gurwitz, D
    LANCET, 1997, 350 (9086): : 1254 - 1254
  • [37] Technical factors contributing to procedure-related loss and complication rates following transcervical chorionic villus sampling
    Lim, Kenneth
    Omidakhsh, Negar
    Hutcheon, Jennifer
    Lee, Benny
    Gong, Jeff
    Gagnon, Alain
    Von Dadelzson, Peter
    Robertson, Julie
    Butler, Blair
    Delisle, Marie France
    Pare, Emmanuelle
    Joseph, K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 210 (01) : S85 - S85
  • [38] Amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling - When and why?
    Hebisch, G
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 1995, 256 : S182 - S192
  • [39] Pregnancy loss after chorionic villus sampling and genetic amniocentesis in twin pregnancies: a systematic review
    Agarwal, K.
    Alfirevic, Z.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 40 (02) : 128 - 134
  • [40] FETAL LOSS RATE AFTER CHORIONIC VILLUS SAMPLING AND SUBSEQUENT AMNIOCENTESIS
    BRANDENBURG, H
    JAHODA, MGJ
    PIJPERS, L
    REUSS, A
    KLEYER, WJ
    WLADIMIROFF, JW
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 1990, 35 (02): : 178 - 180