Procedure-Related Complications after Genetic Amniocentesis and Chorionic Villus Sampling

被引:19
|
作者
Kollmann, M. [1 ]
Haeusler, M. [1 ]
Haas, J. [1 ]
Csapo, B. [1 ]
Lang, U. [1 ]
Klaritsch, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Graz, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, A-8036 Graz, Austria
来源
ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN | 2013年 / 34卷 / 04期
关键词
obstetrcis; pregnancy; amniocentesis; chorionic villus; sampling; FETAL LOSS RATE; PRENATAL-DIAGNOSIS; HYPERTENSIVE DISORDERS; LOSS RATES; RISK; TRISOMY-21; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1055/s-0032-1312939
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Purpose: Amniocentesis (AC) and chorionic villus sampling (CVS) play an important role in the diagnosis of genetic anomalies. The aim of this study was to evaluate presentable numbers of procedure-related complications of genetic interventions in a tertiary referral hospital. Materials and Methods: The pregnancy outcome of women who underwent genetic AC or CVS during 2003-2010 at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Graz, Austria, was analyzed retrospectively. The primary outcome was miscarriage or membrane rupture after an invasive procedure. Only singleton gestations were included. Results: 1,569 AC procedures and 334 CVS procedures (234 transabdominal, 99 transcervical, 1 with undocumented route) were performed. Of these, 57 cases were excluded from further analysis because of severe anomalies. Complete outcome data were available for 93.17 % of cases. In 164 (8.89 %) cases the pregnancy was terminated due to genetic anomalies or severe malformations. In the remaining collective 10 of 1,342 (0.75 %) AC procedures, 3 of 150 (2.00 %) transabdominal CVS procedures and 2 of 64 (3.13 %) transcervical CVS procedures lead to complications resulting in miscarriage <24 weeks (n = 13) or rupture of membranes (n = 2) within 2 weeks after procedure. Complication rates were significantly higher after CVS than after AC (OR 3.19). Conclusion: Over an observation period of seven years, the complication rates after AC, transabdominal CVS and transcervical CVS were 0.75 %, 2.00 % and 3.13 %, respectively. These results are comparable to recent international investigations.
引用
收藏
页码:345 / 348
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Analgesia for amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling
    Mujezinovic, Faris
    Alfirevic, Zarko
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2011, (11):
  • [22] CHORIONIC VILLUS SAMPLING FOLLOWED BY GENETIC AMNIOCENTESIS AND SEPTIC SHOCK
    MUGGAH, HF
    DALTON, ME
    HUNTER, AGW
    LANCET, 1987, 1 (8537): : 867 - 868
  • [23] Procedure-Related Fetal Loss following Chorionic Villus Sampling after First-Trimester Aneuploidy Screening
    Wah, Yi Man
    Leung, Tak Yeung
    Cheng, Yvonne Kwun Yue
    Sahota, Daljit Singh
    FETAL DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY, 2017, 41 (03) : 184 - 190
  • [24] Maternal complications following amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling for prenatal karyotyping
    Cederholm, M
    Haglund, B
    Axelsson, O
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2003, 110 (04) : 392 - 399
  • [25] Fetal loss after amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling in Iceland
    Haraldsdottir, Kristin Rut
    Gottfredsdottir, Helga
    Geirsson, Reynir Tomas
    LAEKNABLADID, 2014, 100 (03): : 147 - 151
  • [26] SEPTIC COMPLICATIONS AFTER CHORIONIC VILLUS SAMPLING
    BRAMBATI, B
    MATARRELLI, M
    VAROTTO, F
    LANCET, 1987, 1 (8543): : 1212 - 1213
  • [27] Chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis for prenatal diagnosis
    Stranc, LC
    Evans, JA
    Hamerton, JL
    LANCET, 1997, 349 (9053): : 711 - 714
  • [28] How painful are amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling?
    Csaba, A
    Bush, MC
    Saphier, C
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2006, 26 (01) : 35 - 38
  • [29] Loss rate for amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling
    Haskovec, Jennifer M.
    Singletary, Claire N.
    Sherrill, Jennifer L.
    Mastrobattista, Andjoan M.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 111 (04): : 110S - 110S
  • [30] Retrospective analysis: amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling
    Lee, F.
    Crichton, L.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2012, 119 : 77 - 78