CMIP5 SCIENTIFIC GAPS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CMIP6

被引：238
|
作者：
Stouffer, R. J. [1 ]
Eyring, V. [2 ]
Meehl, G. A. [3 ]
Bony, S. [4 ]
Senior, C. [5 ]
Stevens, B. [6 ]
Taylor, K. E. [7 ]
机构：
[1] NOAA, Geophys Fluid Dynam Lab, Princeton, NJ 08540 USA
[2] Deutsch Zentrum Luft & Raumfahrt DLR, Inst Phys Atmosphare, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany
[3] Natl Ctr Atmospher Res, POB 3000, Boulder, CO 80307 USA
[4] CNRS, Lab Meteorol Dynam, IPSL, Paris, France
[5] Hadley Ctr, Met Off, Exeter, Devon, England
[6] Max Planck Inst Meteorol, Hamburg, Germany
[7] Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab, Program Climate Model Diag & Intercomparison, Livermore, CA USA
来源：
BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY | 2017年 / 98卷 / 01期
关键词：
SOUTHERN-OCEAN; CLIMATE; MODELS; CARBON; SENSITIVITY; CLOUDS; CYCLE; FEEDBACKS; AMIP; SST;
D O I：
10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00013.1
中图分类号：
P4 [大气科学（气象学）];
学科分类号：
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要：
The scientific gaps identified in the fifth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) that guided the experiment for its next phase, CMIP6, are identified.
引用
收藏
页码：95 / +
页数：12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Recent progress in simulating two types of ENSO - from CMIP5 to CMIP6
    Hou, Meiyi
    Tang, Youmin
    FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2022, 9
  • [42] Are Cut-off Lows simulated better in CMIP6 compared to CMIP5?
    Pinheiro, Henri
    Ambrizzi, Tercio
    Hodges, Kevin
    Gan, Manoel
    Andrade, Kelen
    Garcia, Jose
    CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2022, 59 (7-8) : 2117 - 2136
  • [43] Relative performance of CMIP5 and CMIP6 models in simulating rainfall in Peninsular Malaysia
    Sahar Hadi Pour
    Shamsuddin Shahid
    Mohammed Mainuddin
    Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 2022, 149 : 709 - 725
  • [44] A comparison of CMIP5 and CMIP6 climate model projections for hydrological impacts in China
    Lei, Yawen
    Chen, Jie
    Xiong, Lihua
    HYDROLOGY RESEARCH, 2023, 54 (03): : 330 - 347
  • [45] The MJO From CMIP5 to CMIP6: Perspectives From Tracking MJO Precipitation
    Chen, Guiwan
    Ling, Jian
    Zhang, Rongwang
    Xiao, Ziniu
    Li, Chongyin
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2022, 49 (01)
  • [46] Relative performance of CMIP5 and CMIP6 models in simulating rainfall in Peninsular Malaysia
    Pour, Sahar Hadi
    Shahid, Shamsuddin
    Mainuddin, Mohammed
    THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY, 2022, 149 (1-2) : 709 - 725
  • [47] Differences Between the CMIP5 and CMIP6 Antarctic Sea Ice Concentration Budgets
    Nie, Yafei
    Lin, Xia
    Yang, Qinghua
    Liu, Jiping
    Chen, Dake
    Uotila, Petteri
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2023, 50 (23)
  • [48] Emergent constraints on equilibrium climate sensitivity in CMIP5: do they mid for CMIP6?
    Schlund, Manuel
    Lauer, Axel
    Gentine, Pierre
    Sherwood, Steven C.
    Eyring, Veronika
    EARTH SYSTEM DYNAMICS, 2020, 11 (04) : 1233 - 1258
  • [49] Are Cut-off Lows simulated better in CMIP6 compared to CMIP5?
    Henri Pinheiro
    Tercio Ambrizzi
    Kevin Hodges
    Manoel Gan
    Kelen Andrade
    Jose Garcia
    Climate Dynamics, 2022, 59 : 2117 - 2136
  • [50] Variations in the Frequency of Stratospheric Sudden Warmings in CMIP5 and CMIP6 and Possible Causes
    Wu, Zheng
    Reichler, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2020, 33 (23) : 10305 - 10320
12345