CMIP5 SCIENTIFIC GAPS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CMIP6

被引:238
|
作者
Stouffer, R. J. [1 ]
Eyring, V. [2 ]
Meehl, G. A. [3 ]
Bony, S. [4 ]
Senior, C. [5 ]
Stevens, B. [6 ]
Taylor, K. E. [7 ]
机构
[1] NOAA, Geophys Fluid Dynam Lab, Princeton, NJ 08540 USA
[2] Deutsch Zentrum Luft & Raumfahrt DLR, Inst Phys Atmosphare, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany
[3] Natl Ctr Atmospher Res, POB 3000, Boulder, CO 80307 USA
[4] CNRS, Lab Meteorol Dynam, IPSL, Paris, France
[5] Hadley Ctr, Met Off, Exeter, Devon, England
[6] Max Planck Inst Meteorol, Hamburg, Germany
[7] Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab, Program Climate Model Diag & Intercomparison, Livermore, CA USA
关键词
SOUTHERN-OCEAN; CLIMATE; MODELS; CARBON; SENSITIVITY; CLOUDS; CYCLE; FEEDBACKS; AMIP; SST;
D O I
10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00013.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
The scientific gaps identified in the fifth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) that guided the experiment for its next phase, CMIP6, are identified.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / +
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Tracking Improvement in Simulated Marine Biogeochemistry Between CMIP5 and CMIP6
    Seferian, Roland
    Berthet, Sarah
    Yool, Andrew
    Palmieri, Julien
    Bopp, Laurent
    Tagliabue, Alessandro
    Kwiatkowski, Lester
    Aumont, Olivier
    Christian, James
    Dunne, John
    Gehlen, Marion
    Ilyina, Tatiana
    John, Jasmin G.
    Li, Hongmei
    Long, Matthew C.
    Luo, Jessica Y.
    Nakano, Hideyuki
    Romanou, Anastasia
    Schwinger, Jorg
    Stock, Charles
    Santana-Falcon, Yeray
    Takano, Yohei
    Tjiputra, Jerry
    Tsujino, Hiroyuki
    Watanabe, Michio
    Wu, Tongwen
    Wu, Fanghua
    Yamamoto, Akitomo
    CURRENT CLIMATE CHANGE REPORTS, 2020, 6 (03) : 95 - 119
  • [22] Uncertainty of ENSO-amplitude projections in CMIP5 and CMIP6 models
    Beobide-Arsuaga, Goratz
    Bayr, Tobias
    Reintges, Annika
    Latif, Mojib
    CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2021, 56 (11-12) : 3875 - 3888
  • [23] CMIP5 and CMIP6: contrasting perspectives on Nigeria's climate transformation
    Tanimu, Bashir
    Hamed, Mohammed Magdy
    Bello, Al-Amin Danladi
    Abdullahi, Sule Argungu
    Ajibike, Morufu A.
    Yaseen, Zaher Mundher
    Alasow, Ahmed Abdiaziz
    Muhammad, Mohd Khairul Idlan bin
    Shahid, Shamsuddin
    THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY, 2025, 156 (01)
  • [24] The Arctic Surface Climate in CMIP6: Status and Developments since CMIP5
    Davy, Richard
    Outten, Stephen
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2020, 33 (18) : 8047 - 8068
  • [25] Colombian climatology in CMIP5/CMIP6 models: Persistent biases and improvements
    Arias, Paola A.
    Ortega, Geusep
    Villegas, Laura D.
    Martinez, J. Alejandro
    REVISTA FACULTAD DE INGENIERIA-UNIVERSIDAD DE ANTIOQUIA, 2021, (100): : 75 - 96
  • [26] Uncertainty of ENSO-amplitude projections in CMIP5 and CMIP6 models
    Goratz Beobide-Arsuaga
    Tobias Bayr
    Annika Reintges
    Mojib Latif
    Climate Dynamics, 2021, 56 : 3875 - 3888
  • [27] Analysing Urban Flooding Risk with CMIP5 and CMIP6 Climate Projections
    Oyelakin, Rafiu
    Yang, Wenyu
    Krebs, Peter
    WATER, 2024, 16 (03)
  • [28] Evaluation of the Antarctic Circumpolar Wave Simulated by CMIP5 and CMIP6 Models
    Lu, Zhichao
    Zhao, Tianbao
    Zhou, Weican
    ATMOSPHERE, 2020, 11 (09)
  • [29] Evaluation and comparison of CMIP6 and CMIP5 model performance in simulating the runoff
    Guo, Hai
    Zhan, Chesheng
    Ning, Like
    Li, Zhonghe
    Hu, Shi
    THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY, 2022, 149 (3-4) : 1451 - 1470
  • [30] Evaluation and comparison of CMIP6 and CMIP5 model performance in simulating the runoff
    Hai Guo
    Chesheng Zhan
    Like Ning
    Zhonghe Li
    Shi Hu
    Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 2022, 149 : 1451 - 1470