CMIP5 SCIENTIFIC GAPS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CMIP6

被引：238
|
作者：
Stouffer, R. J. [1 ]
Eyring, V. [2 ]
Meehl, G. A. [3 ]
Bony, S. [4 ]
Senior, C. [5 ]
Stevens, B. [6 ]
Taylor, K. E. [7 ]
机构：
[1] NOAA, Geophys Fluid Dynam Lab, Princeton, NJ 08540 USA
[2] Deutsch Zentrum Luft & Raumfahrt DLR, Inst Phys Atmosphare, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany
[3] Natl Ctr Atmospher Res, POB 3000, Boulder, CO 80307 USA
[4] CNRS, Lab Meteorol Dynam, IPSL, Paris, France
[5] Hadley Ctr, Met Off, Exeter, Devon, England
[6] Max Planck Inst Meteorol, Hamburg, Germany
[7] Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab, Program Climate Model Diag & Intercomparison, Livermore, CA USA
来源：
BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY | 2017年 / 98卷 / 01期
关键词：
SOUTHERN-OCEAN; CLIMATE; MODELS; CARBON; SENSITIVITY; CLOUDS; CYCLE; FEEDBACKS; AMIP; SST;
D O I：
10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00013.1
中图分类号：
P4 [大气科学（气象学）];
学科分类号：
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要：
The scientific gaps identified in the fifth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) that guided the experiment for its next phase, CMIP6, are identified.
引用
收藏
页码：95 / +
页数：12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Hydrological Projections under CMIP5 and CMIP6
    Wu, Yi
    Miao, Chiyuan
    Slater, Louise
    Fan, Xuewei
    Chai, Yuanfang
    Sorooshian, Soroosh
    BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2024, 105 (01) : E2374 - E2389
  • [2] Blocking Simulations in GFDL GCMs for CMIP5 and CMIP6
    Liu, Ping
    Reed, Kevin A.
    Garner, Stephen T.
    Zhao, Ming
    Zhu, Yuejian
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2022, 35 (15) : 5053 - 5070
  • [3] Contributions to Polar Amplification in CMIP5 and CMIP6 Models
    Hahn, L. C.
    Armour, K. C.
    Zelinka, M. D.
    Bitz, C. M.
    Donohoe, A.
    FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE, 2021, 9
  • [4] Projections of Greenland climate change from CMIP5 and CMIP6
    Zhang, Qinglin
    Huai, Baojuan
    Ding, Minghu
    Sun, Weijun
    Liu, Weigang
    Yan, Jinpei
    Zhao, Shuhui
    Wang, Yetang
    Wang, Yuzhe
    Wang, Lei
    Che, Jiahang
    Dou, Jiahui
    Kang, Limin
    GLOBAL AND PLANETARY CHANGE, 2024, 232
  • [5] Comparison of CMIP6 and CMIP5 models in simulating climate extremes
    Chen, Huopo
    Sun, Jianqi
    Lin, Wenqing
    Xu, Huiwen
    SCIENCE BULLETIN, 2020, 65 (17) : 1415 - 1418
  • [6] Simulations of ENSO Phase-Locking in CMIP5 and CMIP6
    Chen, Han-Ching
    Jin, Fei-Fei
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2021, 34 (12) : 5135 - 5149
  • [7] On the spring stratospheric final warming in CMIP5 and CMIP6 models
    Hu, Jinggao
    Liu, Zexuan
    Xu, Haiming
    Ren, Rongcai
    Jin, Dachao
    SCIENCE CHINA-EARTH SCIENCES, 2023, 66 (01) : 129 - 145
  • [8] Uncertainty in Projection of Climate Extremes: A Comparison of CMIP5 and CMIP6
    Zhang, Shaobo
    Chen, Jie
    JOURNAL OF METEOROLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 35 (04) : 646 - 662
  • [9] Comparison of trends in the Hadley circulation between CMIP6 and CMIP5
    Xia, Yan
    Hu, Yongyun
    Liu, Jiping
    SCIENCE BULLETIN, 2020, 65 (19) : 1667 - 1674
  • [10] On the spring stratospheric final warming in CMIP5 and CMIP6 models
    Jinggao HU
    Zexuan LIU
    Haiming XU
    Rongcai REN
    Dachao JIN
    Science China(Earth Sciences), 2023, 66 (01) : 129 - 145
12345