Heel effect adaptive flat field correction of digital x-ray detectors

被引:7
|
作者
Yu, Yongjian [1 ]
Wang, Jue [2 ]
机构
[1] Varian Med Syst Inc, Xray Prod, Liverpool, NY 13088 USA
[2] Union Coll, Dept Math, Schenectady, NY 12308 USA
关键词
anode heel effect; digital x-ray detector; gain calibration; nonuniformity; source-to-image distance; NONUNIFORMITY;
D O I
10.1118/1.4813303
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: Anode heel effect renders large-scale background nonuniformities in digital radiographs. Conventional offset/gain calibration is performed at mono source-to-image distance (SID), and disregards the SID-dependent characteristic of heel effect. It results in a residual nonuniform background in the corrected radiographs when the SID settings for calibration and correction differ. In this work, the authors develop a robust and efficient computational method for digital x-ray detector gain correction adapted to SID-variant heel effect, without resorting to physical filters, phantoms, complicated heel effect models, or multiple-SID calibration and interpolation. Methods: The authors present the Duo-SID projection correction method. In our approach, conventional offset/gain calibrations are performed only twice, at the minimum and maximum SIDs of the system in typical clinical use. A fast iterative separation algorithm is devised to extract the detector gain and basis heel patterns from the min/max SID calibrations. The resultant detector gain is independent of SID, while the basis heel patterns are parameterized by the min- and max-SID. The heel pattern at any SID is obtained from the min-SID basis heel pattern via projection imaging principles. The system gain desired at a specific acquisition SID is then constructed using the projected heel pattern and detector gain map. Results: The method was evaluated for flat field and anatomical phantom image corrections. It demonstrated promising improvements over interpolation and conventional gain calibration/correction methods, lowering their correction errors by approximately 70% and 80%, respectively. The separation algorithm was able to extract the detector gain and heel patterns with less than 2% error, and the Duo-SID corrected images showed perceptually appealing uniform background across the detector. Conclusions: The Duo-SID correction method has substantially improved on conventional offset/gain corrections for digital x-ray imaging in an SID-variant environment. The technique is relatively simple, and can be easily incorporated into multiple-point gain calibration/correction techniques. It offers a potentially valuable tool for preprocessing digital x-ray images to boost image quality of mammography, chest and cardiac radiography, as well as automated computer aided diagnostic radiology. (C) 2013 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] FLAT RESPONSE DETECTORS FROM UV TO X-RAY REGION
    KANIA, DR
    REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 1986, 57 (08): : 2011 - 2011
  • [22] Review X-ray photoconductors and stabilized a-Se for direct conversion digital flat-panel X-ray image-detectors
    S. O. Kasap
    J. A. Rowlands
    Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, 2000, 11 : 179 - 198
  • [23] Quality control measurements for digital x-ray detectors
    Marshall, N. W.
    Mackenzie, A.
    Honey, I. D.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2011, 56 (04): : 979 - 999
  • [24] Digital x-ray detectors for radiography: Technical innovations
    Dobbins, JT
    RADIOLOGY, 1999, 213P : 149 - 149
  • [25] A comparative study of digital x-ray software and detectors
    Prompalit, Sakunrat
    Sinsuebphon, Nattawut
    Thanasupsombat, Chalinee
    Thongvigitmanee, Saowapak
    13TH BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE (BMEICON 2021), 2018,
  • [26] Limitations to flat-field correction methods when using an X-ray spectrum
    Davidson, DW
    Fröjdh, C
    O'Shea, V
    Nilsson, HE
    Rahman, M
    NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 2003, 509 (1-3): : 146 - 150
  • [27] Medical imaging with mercuric iodide direct digital radiography flat-panel X-ray detectors
    Schieber, M
    Hermon, H
    Zentai, G
    Partain, L
    Street, RA
    Gilboa, H
    RADIOLOGY, 2001, 221 : 464 - 464
  • [28] Medical imaging with mercuric iodide direct digital radiography flat-panel X-ray detectors
    Gilboa, H
    Zuck, A
    Dagan, O
    Vilensky, A
    Breen, BN
    Taieb, A
    Reisman, B
    Hermon, H
    Zentai, G
    Partain, L
    Street, R
    Ready, S
    X-RAY AND GAMMA-RAY DETECTORS AND APPLICATIONS IV, 2002, 4784 : 315 - 325
  • [29] Adaptive image interpolation for full-field digital x-ray mammography
    Liu, H
    Wang, G
    Xu, F
    Fajardo, LL
    APPLIED OPTICS, 1999, 38 (01) : 253 - 257
  • [30] A diffraction effect in X-ray area detectors
    Gollwitzer, C. (christian.gollwitzer@ptb.de), 1600, International Union of Crystallography, 5 Abbey Road, Chester, CH1 2HU, United Kingdom (47):