Complementing clinical cancer registry data with patient reported outcomes: A feasibility study on routine electronic patient-reported outcome assessment for the Austrian Myelome Registry

被引:15
|
作者
Sztankay, Monika [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Neppl, Lucia [2 ]
Wintner, Lisa M. [1 ,3 ]
Loth, Fanny L. [2 ]
Willenbacher, Wolfgang [4 ,5 ]
Weger, Roman [5 ]
Weyrer, Walpurga [4 ]
Steurer, Michael [4 ]
Rumpold, Gerhard [1 ]
Holzner, Bernhard [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Tirol, Austria
[2] Univ Innsbruck Hosp, Psychiat 2, Anichstr 35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Tirol, Austria
[3] Univ Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Tirol, Austria
[4] Univ Innsbruck Hosp, Internal Med Haematol & Oncol 5, Innsbruck, Tirol, Austria
[5] Oncotyrol Ctr Personalized Canc Med, Innsbruck, Tirol, Austria
基金
奥地利科学基金会;
关键词
cancer registry; clinical routine; electronic patient-reported outcome monitoring; health-related quality of life; implementation; multiple myeloma; QUALITY; CARE; SURVEILLANCE; RATIONALE; SYMPTOMS; TRIALS;
D O I
10.1111/ecc.13154
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives Routinely assessed patient-reported outcomes (PROs), such as quality of life (QOL), are important to supplement clinical cancer data but requires rigorous implementation. This study aims at depicting the implementation procedure and evaluating the feasibility of routine electronic PRO monitoring (ePRO) for collecting data supplementing the Austrian Myeloma Registry (AMR). Methods Integration of ePRO monitoring into clinical routine was planned according to the Replicating Effective Programs framework. QOL data were assessed regularly during treatment and aftercare at the hematooncological outpatient unit at the Medical University of Innsbruck with the EORTC QLQ-C30/ +MY20 and the EQ-5D-5L. Feasibility and usability testing were performed via a multimethod approach. Results Within the first year, 94.4% of the MM patients (N = 142, mean age 65.4, SD 11.8, 60% male) provided 748 PRO assessment time points overall. Patients and clinicians were satisfied with ePRO monitoring and indicated no to little disruption in clinical routine. Patient preference on assessment time points and completion frequency became evident. Conclusions Complementing the AMR with ePRO data proved to be feasible. Our findings provide useful insights for healthcare providers considering introducing ePRO monitoring to their units for informing clinical registries as well as individualised feedback to patients alike.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The routine clinical use of electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROMs) for patients with lung cancer
    Crockett, Cathryn
    Price, James
    Pham, Mai
    Abdulwahid, Danya
    Bayman, Neil
    Blackhall, Fiona
    Bostock, Layla
    Califano, Raffaele
    Chan, Clara
    Coote, Joanna
    Cove-Smith, Laura
    Eaton, Marie
    Fenemore, Jacqueline
    Gomes, Fabio
    Harris, Margaret
    Halkyard, Emma
    Hughes, Sarah
    Lindsay, Colin
    Neal, Hilary
    McEntee, Delyth
    Pemberton, Laura
    Sheikh, Hamid
    Summers, Yvonne
    Taylor, Paul
    Woolf, David
    Yorke, Janelle
    Faivre-Finn, Corinne
    LUNG CANCER, 2023, 178 : S5 - S6
  • [32] CHANGE IN PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES OF XLH REGISTRY PARTICIPANTS IN THE UK: A LONGITUDINAL STUDY
    Cole, S.
    Gray, N.
    Barrett, J.
    Turner, A.
    Sanchez-Santos, M. T.
    Kolovos, S.
    Javaid, M. K.
    Pinedo-Villanueva, R.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 31 (SUPPL 1) : S329 - S330
  • [33] Evaluation of electronic patient–reported outcome assessment in inpatient cancer care: a feasibility study
    Hanna Salm
    Leopold Hentschel
    Martin Eichler
    Daniel Pink
    Stephan Fuhrmann
    Michael Kramer
    Peter Reichardt
    Markus K. Schuler
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2023, 31
  • [34] Using a Web-Based Data Collection Platform to Implement an Effective Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Registry
    Lizzio, Vincent A.
    Gulledge, Caleb M.
    Meta, Fabien
    Franovic, Sreten
    Makhni, Eric C.
    ARTHROSCOPY TECHNIQUES, 2019, 8 (06): : E535 - E539
  • [35] Patient Voices: Multimethod Study on the Feasibility of Implementing Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in a Comprehensive Cancer Center
    Brunelli, Cinzia
    Alfieri, Sara
    Zito, Emanuela
    Spelta, Marco
    Arba, Laura
    Lombi, Linda
    Caselli, Luana
    Caraceni, Augusto
    Borreani, Claudia
    Roli, Anna
    Miceli, Rosalba
    Tine, Gabriele
    Zecca, Ernesto
    Platania, Marco
    Procopio, Giuseppe
    Nicolai, Nicola
    Battaglia, Luigi
    Lozza, Laura
    Shkodra, Morena
    Massa, Giacomo
    Loiacono, Daniele
    Apolone, Giovanni
    JMIR CANCER, 2025, 11
  • [36] Patient-Reported Clinical and Productivity Outcomes From the Longitudinal Telotristat Ethyl Treatment Registry
    Li, Daneng
    Darden, Christina
    Sayeed, Salma
    Jackson, Laurin
    Garbinsky, Diana
    Osman, Noran
    PANCREAS, 2022, 51 (03) : E36 - E36
  • [37] Feasibility of electronic collection of patient-reported outcomes in outpatient clinic
    Ryan, P
    Villanueva, I
    Yocum, D
    Castro, L
    Kasle, S
    Lisse, J
    Miller, M
    Gilmer, K
    ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2004, 50 (09): : S661 - S661
  • [38] Association of patient, treatment and disease characteristics with patient-reported outcomes: Results of the ECHO Registry
    Hay, Charles R. M.
    Makris, Michael
    Shima, Midori
    Nagao, Azusa
    Jimenez-Yuste, Victor
    Skinner, Mark
    Kessler, Craig M.
    von Mackensen, Sylvia
    HAEMOPHILIA, 2024, 30 (01) : 106 - 115
  • [39] Acceptability study of patient-reported outcome measures for the Australasian pelvic floor procedure registry
    Ruseckaite, Rasa
    Bavor, Claire
    Marsh, Lucy
    Dean, Joanne
    Daly, Oliver
    Vasiliadis, Dora
    Ahern, Susannah
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 129 : 116 - 116
  • [40] Optimizing Electronic Capture of Clinical Outcome Assessment Data in Clinical Trials: The Case of Patient-Reported Endpoints
    Sarah Fleming
    Alexandra I. Barsdorf
    Cindy Howry
    Hannah O’Gorman
    Stephen Joel Coons
    Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, 2015, 49 : 797 - 804