Complementing clinical cancer registry data with patient reported outcomes: A feasibility study on routine electronic patient-reported outcome assessment for the Austrian Myelome Registry

被引:15
|
作者
Sztankay, Monika [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Neppl, Lucia [2 ]
Wintner, Lisa M. [1 ,3 ]
Loth, Fanny L. [2 ]
Willenbacher, Wolfgang [4 ,5 ]
Weger, Roman [5 ]
Weyrer, Walpurga [4 ]
Steurer, Michael [4 ]
Rumpold, Gerhard [1 ]
Holzner, Bernhard [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Tirol, Austria
[2] Univ Innsbruck Hosp, Psychiat 2, Anichstr 35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Tirol, Austria
[3] Univ Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Tirol, Austria
[4] Univ Innsbruck Hosp, Internal Med Haematol & Oncol 5, Innsbruck, Tirol, Austria
[5] Oncotyrol Ctr Personalized Canc Med, Innsbruck, Tirol, Austria
基金
奥地利科学基金会;
关键词
cancer registry; clinical routine; electronic patient-reported outcome monitoring; health-related quality of life; implementation; multiple myeloma; QUALITY; CARE; SURVEILLANCE; RATIONALE; SYMPTOMS; TRIALS;
D O I
10.1111/ecc.13154
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives Routinely assessed patient-reported outcomes (PROs), such as quality of life (QOL), are important to supplement clinical cancer data but requires rigorous implementation. This study aims at depicting the implementation procedure and evaluating the feasibility of routine electronic PRO monitoring (ePRO) for collecting data supplementing the Austrian Myeloma Registry (AMR). Methods Integration of ePRO monitoring into clinical routine was planned according to the Replicating Effective Programs framework. QOL data were assessed regularly during treatment and aftercare at the hematooncological outpatient unit at the Medical University of Innsbruck with the EORTC QLQ-C30/ +MY20 and the EQ-5D-5L. Feasibility and usability testing were performed via a multimethod approach. Results Within the first year, 94.4% of the MM patients (N = 142, mean age 65.4, SD 11.8, 60% male) provided 748 PRO assessment time points overall. Patients and clinicians were satisfied with ePRO monitoring and indicated no to little disruption in clinical routine. Patient preference on assessment time points and completion frequency became evident. Conclusions Complementing the AMR with ePRO data proved to be feasible. Our findings provide useful insights for healthcare providers considering introducing ePRO monitoring to their units for informing clinical registries as well as individualised feedback to patients alike.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Establishing patient-reported outcome measures for the Breast Device Registry
    Vishwanath, Swarna
    Ng, Nicole
    Cooter, Rodney
    Elder, Elisabeth
    Moore, Colin
    Pusic, Andrea
    Hopper, Ingrid
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 89 (03) : 266 - 267
  • [22] Implementation and Feasibility of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome (ePRO) Data Entry in the PRAEGNANT Real-Time Advanced and Metastatic Breast Cancer Registry
    Wallwiener, Markus
    Heindl, Felix
    Brucker, Sara Y.
    Taran, Florin-Andrei
    Hartkopf, Andreas
    Overkamp, Friedrich
    Kolberg, Hans-Christian
    Hadji, Peyman
    Tesch, Hans
    Ettl, Johannes
    Lux, Michael P.
    Rauh, Claudia
    Blum, Simon
    Nabieva, Naiba
    Brodkorb, Tobias F.
    Faschingbauer, Cornelia
    Langemann, Hanna
    Schulmeyer, Carla
    Volz, Bernhard
    Ruebner, Matthias
    Lueftner, Diana
    Mueller, Volkmar
    Belleville, Erik
    Janni, Wolfgang
    Fehm, Tanja N.
    Wallwiener, Diethelm
    Ganslandt, Thomas
    Beckmann, Matthias W.
    Schneeweiss, Andreas
    Fasching, Peter A.
    Gass, Paul
    GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 2017, 77 (08) : 870 - 878
  • [23] Use of SMS in Obtaining Patient-Reported Outcomes in the Australian Stroke Clinical Registry
    Morrison, Julie
    Hancock, Shaun
    Carter, Helen
    Lester, Marcus
    Moss, Karen Barclay
    Kim, Joosup
    Kilkenny, Monique
    Dewey, Helen
    Grimley, Rohan
    Middleton, Sandy
    Lannin, Natasha A.
    Cadilhac, Dominique A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2023, 18 (02) : 61 - 61
  • [24] Incorporating Patient Reported Outcomes into the Lung Cancer Registry
    King, J.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2021, 16 (03) : S86 - S86
  • [25] ON THE USES OF ROUTINE PATIENT-REPORTED HEALTH OUTCOME DATA
    Smith, Peter C.
    Street, Andrew D.
    HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2013, 22 (02) : 119 - 131
  • [26] Developing a Lung Cancer Clinical Quality Registry Framework to Collect Longitudinal Patient-Reported Outcomes
    Moloczij, N.
    Duffy, M.
    Gough, K.
    Ball, D.
    Solomon, B.
    Mileshkin, L.
    Krishnasamy, M.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2017, 12 (11) : S1812 - S1813
  • [27] AN ELECTRONIC PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES SYSTEM IN UK CHIROPRACTIC PRACTICES: A FEASIBILITY STUDY OF ROUTINE COLLECTION OF OUTCOMES AND COSTS
    Newell, Dave
    Diment, Emily
    Bolton, Jenni E.
    JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2016, 39 (01) : 31 - 41
  • [28] Use of a Cancer Registry to Evaluate Patient-Reported Outcomes of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
    Jim, Heather S. L.
    Eisel, Sarah L.
    Hoogland, Aasha, I
    Shaw, Sandra
    King, Jennifer C.
    Dicker, Adam P.
    CANCERS, 2021, 13 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [29] Implementing routine assessment of patient-reported outcomes in cancer care.
    Mooney, Kathi
    Biber, Joshua
    Hess, Rachel
    Weeks, Howard
    Sweetenham, John W.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35 (08)
  • [30] Standardizing patient-reported outcomes assessment in cancer clinical trials: A patient-reported outcomes measurement information system initiative
    Garcia, Sofia F.
    Cella, David
    Clauser, Steven B.
    Flynn, Kathryn E.
    Lad, Thomas
    Lai, Jin-Shei
    Reeve, Bryce B.
    Smith, Ashley Wilder
    Stone, Arthur A.
    Weinfurt, Kevin
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (32) : 5106 - 5112