Deadline-based incentive contracts in project management with cost salience

被引:9
|
作者
Chen, Zhihua [1 ]
Lan, Yanfei [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Ruiqing [1 ]
Shang, Changjing [2 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Univ, Coll Management & Econ, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
[2] Aberystwyth Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Aberystwyth SY23 3DB, Dyfed, Wales
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Uncertainty theory; Incentive mechanism; Project management; Information asymmetry; Cost salience; PROCRASTINATION; COMPENSATION; PERFORMANCE; INFORMATION; IMPACTS; OPTION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s10700-019-09302-y
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The contractor's procrastinating behavior owing to the psychology of cost salience exposes the project manager to the risk of time delay, which brings a significant challenge in project manager's incentive contract design. This paper considers that a project manager pays a contractor over a menu of deadline-based incentive contracts to conduct a project which consists of two sequential tasks. The contractor is endowed with private cost salience information and unobservable efforts. The subjective assessments about the cost salience degree and the project variability are characterized as uncertain variables. Within the framework of uncertainty theory and principal-agent theory, we investigate the impacts of the existence of cost salience and information asymmetry on the incentive contract and the project manager's profit. We confirm that cost salience can impel the project manager to lower both the fixed payment under full information and the penalty/incentive rate under pure moral hazard. Interestingly, we find that moral hazard can weaken the extent of inverse impact caused by the existence of cost salience for the project manager. Our study also shows that, for mitigating the adverse impacts brought by moral hazard, the project manager is more profitable to provide effort incentive when the contractor's efforts are more productive or the project risk is in a higher level. Finally, other suggestions for mitigating the detrimental impacts brought by adverse selection are provided by numerical experiments.
引用
收藏
页码:451 / 473
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] SYMPOSIUM ON PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND INCENTIVE CONTRACTING PROCEDURES .2. DESIGN OF INCENTIVE CONTRACTS BASIC PRINCIPLES
    BLYTH, AH
    AERONAUTICAL JOURNAL, 1969, 73 (698): : 119 - &
  • [22] Admission control for multimedia delivery over deadline-based networks
    Liu, Yanni Ellen
    Wu, Jie
    GLOBECOM 2007: 2007 IEEE GLOBAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-11, 2007, : 2058 - 2063
  • [23] Optimal UAV Deployment for Data Collection in Deadline-based IoT Applications
    Albu-Salih, Alaa Taima
    Seno, Seyed Amin Hosseini
    BAGHDAD SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2018, 15 (04) : 484 - 491
  • [24] Study of a scheduling policy for diverse deadline-based quality of service
    Stavrakakis, I
    Chen, GP
    PERFORMANCE EVALUATION, 2000, 41 (01) : 37 - 62
  • [25] Deadline-based Differentiation in P2P Streaming
    Kiraly, Csaba
    Lo Cigno, Renato
    Abeni, Luca
    2010 IEEE GLOBAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONFERENCE GLOBECOM 2010, 2010,
  • [26] A deadline-based algorithm for dynamic task scheduling with precedence constraints
    Chuprat, Suriayati
    Salleh, Shaharuddin
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE IASTED INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PARALLEL AND DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING AND NETWORKS, 2007, : 158 - +
  • [27] Efficient deadline-based QoS algorithms for high-performance networks
    Martinez, Alejandro
    Apostolopoulos, George
    Alfaro, Francisco J.
    Sanchez, Jose L.
    Duato, Jose
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTERS, 2008, 57 (07) : 928 - 939
  • [28] Fairness in multi-player online games on deadline-based networks
    Le, Anh
    Liu, Yanni Ellen
    2007 4TH IEEE CONSUMER COMMUNICATIONS AND NETWORKING CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-3, 2007, : 670 - 675
  • [29] Incentive Contracts, Market Risk, and Cost of Capital
    Bertomeu, Jeremy
    CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2015, 32 (04) : 1337 - +
  • [30] Incentive Contracts in Delegated Portfolio Management
    Li, C. Wei
    Tiwari, Ashish
    REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2009, 22 (11): : 4681 - 4714