Risk-Benefit Analysis of Seafood Consumption: A Review

被引:72
|
作者
Hellberg, Rosalee S. [2 ]
DeWitt, Christina A. Mireles [3 ]
Morrissey, Michael T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Oregon State Univ, Food Innovat Ctr, Portland, OR 97209 USA
[2] US FDA, Pacific Reg Lab SW, Irvine, CA 92612 USA
[3] Oregon State Univ, Seafood Res & Educ Ctr, Astoria, OR 97103 USA
来源
COMPREHENSIVE REVIEWS IN FOOD SCIENCE AND FOOD SAFETY | 2012年 / 11卷 / 05期
关键词
POLYUNSATURATED FATTY-ACIDS; CORONARY-HEART-DISEASE; POLYCHLORINATED-BIPHENYLS PCBS; IN-UTERO EXPOSURE; PRENATAL METHYLMERCURY EXPOSURE; POLYBROMINATED DIPHENYL ETHERS; MATERNAL FISH INTAKE; QUANTITATIVE-ANALYSIS; CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE; TERM INFANTS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1541-4337.2012.00200.x
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Seafood, defined here as marine and freshwater fish and shellfish, is recognized as a healthy food choice because it is a low-fat protein source that provides long-chain omega-3 fatty acids important for early development along with eye and heart health. However, seafood is also known to contain certain contaminants, such as methylmercury and persistent organic pollutants, which can have harmful effects on human health and development. In order to limit exposure to contaminants while maximizing the benefits of seafood consumption, a number of quantitative and qualitative risk-benefit analyses have been conducted for seafood consumption. This review paper provides a brief background on risk-benefit analysis of foods, followed by a discussion of the risks and benefits associated with fish consumption. Next, risk-benefit analyses are reviewed in an historical context. While risk-benefit analysis consists of three main elements (that is, assessment, management, and communication), this review will primarily focus on risk-benefit assessments. Overall, most studies have found that the benefits far outweigh the risks among the general population, especially when a variety of fish is consumed at least twice per week. However, for certain populations (for example, pregnant women and young children) a more targeted approach is warranted in order to ensure that these groups consume fish that are low in contaminants but high in omega-3 fatty acids. The potentially harmful unintended consequences of risk-benefit communication on the general population and certain groups are also discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:490 / 517
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Basic aspects of risk-benefit analysis
    Beckmann, J
    SEMINARS IN THROMBOSIS AND HEMOSTASIS, 1999, 25 (01): : 89 - 95
  • [42] Quantitative risk-benefit analysis of natalizumab
    Thompson, J. P.
    Noyes, K.
    Dorsey, E. R.
    Schwid, S. R.
    Holloway, R. G.
    NEUROLOGY, 2008, 71 (05) : 357 - 364
  • [43] Hormones and cancer: Risk-benefit analysis
    Sevelda, P
    Salzer, H
    GYNAKOLOGISCH-GEBURTSHILFLICHE RUNDSCHAU, 1998, 38 (02): : 61 - 63
  • [44] QUANTITATIVE RISK-BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF NATALIZUMAB
    Steiner, Israel
    NEUROLOGY, 2009, 72 (20) : 1791 - 1791
  • [45] A Risk-Benefit Analysis Is Coffee healthy?
    Richling, Elke
    Habermeyer, Michael
    CHEMIE IN UNSERER ZEIT, 2014, 48 (01) : 12 - 20
  • [46] A RISK-BENEFIT ANALYSIS FOR THE TREATMENT OF HYPERTENSION
    BULPITT, CJ
    POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1993, 69 (816) : 764 - 774
  • [47] RISK-BENEFIT AND COST-BENEFIT-ANALYSIS - REPLY
    NEMETZ, PN
    VINING, A
    POLICY SCIENCES, 1982, 14 (03) : 299 - 302
  • [48] AGAINST RISK-BENEFIT REVIEW OF PRISONER RESEARCH
    Chwang, Eric
    BIOETHICS, 2010, 24 (01) : 14 - 22
  • [49] Risk-Benefit Assessment of Consumption of Rice for Adult Men in China
    Fang, Haiqin
    Zhang, Quantao
    Zhang, Shengjie
    Zhang, Tongwei
    Pan, Feng
    Cui, Yufeng
    Thomsen, Sofie Theresa
    Jakobsen, Lea S.
    Liu, Aidong
    Pires, Sara M.
    FRONTIERS IN NUTRITION, 2021, 8
  • [50] Fish consumption during child bearing age: A quantitative risk-benefit analysis on neurodevelopment
    Zeilmaker, Marco J.
    Hoekstra, Jeljer
    van Eijkeren, Jan C. H.
    de Jong, Nynke
    Hart, Andy
    Kennedy, Marc
    Owen, Helen
    Gunnlaugsdottir, Helga
    FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2013, 54 : 30 - 34