Risk-Benefit Analysis of Seafood Consumption: A Review

被引:72
|
作者
Hellberg, Rosalee S. [2 ]
DeWitt, Christina A. Mireles [3 ]
Morrissey, Michael T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Oregon State Univ, Food Innovat Ctr, Portland, OR 97209 USA
[2] US FDA, Pacific Reg Lab SW, Irvine, CA 92612 USA
[3] Oregon State Univ, Seafood Res & Educ Ctr, Astoria, OR 97103 USA
来源
COMPREHENSIVE REVIEWS IN FOOD SCIENCE AND FOOD SAFETY | 2012年 / 11卷 / 05期
关键词
POLYUNSATURATED FATTY-ACIDS; CORONARY-HEART-DISEASE; POLYCHLORINATED-BIPHENYLS PCBS; IN-UTERO EXPOSURE; PRENATAL METHYLMERCURY EXPOSURE; POLYBROMINATED DIPHENYL ETHERS; MATERNAL FISH INTAKE; QUANTITATIVE-ANALYSIS; CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE; TERM INFANTS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1541-4337.2012.00200.x
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Seafood, defined here as marine and freshwater fish and shellfish, is recognized as a healthy food choice because it is a low-fat protein source that provides long-chain omega-3 fatty acids important for early development along with eye and heart health. However, seafood is also known to contain certain contaminants, such as methylmercury and persistent organic pollutants, which can have harmful effects on human health and development. In order to limit exposure to contaminants while maximizing the benefits of seafood consumption, a number of quantitative and qualitative risk-benefit analyses have been conducted for seafood consumption. This review paper provides a brief background on risk-benefit analysis of foods, followed by a discussion of the risks and benefits associated with fish consumption. Next, risk-benefit analyses are reviewed in an historical context. While risk-benefit analysis consists of three main elements (that is, assessment, management, and communication), this review will primarily focus on risk-benefit assessments. Overall, most studies have found that the benefits far outweigh the risks among the general population, especially when a variety of fish is consumed at least twice per week. However, for certain populations (for example, pregnant women and young children) a more targeted approach is warranted in order to ensure that these groups consume fish that are low in contaminants but high in omega-3 fatty acids. The potentially harmful unintended consequences of risk-benefit communication on the general population and certain groups are also discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:490 / 517
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] RISK-BENEFIT
    MARTIN, J
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1979, 174 (07) : 691 - 691
  • [32] Prostate Biopsy: A Risk-Benefit Analysis
    Loeb, Stacy
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (03): : 852 - 853
  • [33] Best Practices in Risk-Benefit Analysis
    Verhagen, H.
    Tijhuis, M.
    Gunnlaugsdottir, H.
    Kalogeras, N.
    Leino, O.
    Lutejin, J.
    Magnusson, S.
    Odekerken, G.
    Pohjola, M.
    Tuomisto, J.
    Ueland, O.
    White, B.
    Holm, F.
    ANNALS OF NUTRITION AND METABOLISM, 2011, 58 : 415 - 415
  • [34] NEW ANTIMALARIALS - A RISK-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
    NOSTEN, F
    PRICE, RN
    DRUG SAFETY, 1995, 12 (04) : 264 - 273
  • [35] Risk-Benefit Analysis of Bariatric Surgery
    Ludwig, Kaja
    Schneider-Koriath, Sylke
    Bernhardt, Joern
    Huettl, Thomas P.
    VISZERALMEDIZIN, 2010, 26 (01): : 21 - 25
  • [36] Losing the balance in risk-benefit analysis
    Rehani, Madan M.
    JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION, 2023, 43 (02)
  • [37] THE ILEOANAL POUCH - A RISK-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
    KOHLER, L
    TROIDL, H
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1995, 82 (04) : 443 - 447
  • [38] BRAFO -: Risk-benefit analysis of foods
    Boobis, Alan
    Contor, Laura
    Kind, Paul
    Mueller, Detlef
    Rechkemmer, Gerhard
    Verhagen, Hans
    Szoradi, Andras
    ANNALS OF NUTRITION AND METABOLISM, 2007, 51 : 393 - 394
  • [39] Labour analgesia - A risk-benefit analysis
    Eberle, RL
    Norris, MC
    DRUG SAFETY, 1996, 14 (04) : 239 - 251
  • [40] ADVICE AND CONSENT + RISK-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
    BONINE, JE
    ATLANTIC, 1979, 243 (05): : 31 - 31