Prebiopsy multiparametric MRI of the prostate: The end of randomized biopsies?

被引:9
|
作者
Belas, O. [1 ]
Klap, J. [1 ]
Cornud, F. [2 ]
Beuvon, F. [3 ]
Peyromaure, M. [1 ]
Zerbib, M. [1 ]
Delongchamps, N. B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris 05, Hop Cochin, AP HP, Serv Urol, F-75014 Paris, France
[2] Univ Paris 05, Hop Cochin, AP HP, Serv Radiol, F-75014 Paris, France
[3] Univ Paris 05, Hop Cochin, AP HP, Serv Anatomopathol, F-75014 Paris, France
来源
PROGRES EN UROLOGIE | 2012年 / 22卷 / 10期
关键词
Prostate cancer; Multiparametric MRI; Targeted biopsies; CANCER-DETECTION; TUMOR VOLUME; STAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.purol.2012.03.007
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective. - To evaluate the value of multiparametric MRI-targeted prostate biopsies in patients with suspected low-risk prostate cancer. Patients and method. - Patients with normal digital rectal examination and a PSA level between 4 and 10 ng/mL were prospectively included. A multiparametric MRI of the prostate was performed prospectively before the biopsies. 12-core randomized biopsies were performed, with additional targeted samples in each suspicious area identified on MRI. Detected cancers and their histological characteristics were compared between those two biopsy protocols. A micro focal cancer (MFC) was defined by the presence of less than 4 mm of Gleason score 3 + 3 cancer on a single core. Results. - Seventy-one consecutive patients were included. The overall detection rate was of 53% (38/71). It was of 70% (26/37) in the presence of suspicious area on MRI versus 35% (12/34) in the absence of any suspicious area (P = 0.004). MRI-targeted biopsies alone detected three cancers, none of which was a MFC. 12-core biopsies alone detected 14 cancers, including ten MFC (71%). In 21 patients, prostate cancer was detected by both the MRI-targeted and 12-core biopsies. The Gleason score in the MRI-targeted area was the highest Gleason score in 90% of the cases. It was high (> 6) in 76% (16/21) of the patients. Conclusions. - MRI-targeted biopsies detected less micro focal cancers than randomized 12-core biopsies. They did not seem however to decrease the detection of clinically significant cancers. (C) 2012 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:583 / 589
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Prebiopsy Multiparametric 3T Prostate MRI in Patients With Elevated PSA, Normal Digital Rectal Examination, and No Previous Biopsy
    Jambor, Ivan
    Kahkonen, Esa
    Taimen, Pekka
    Merisaari, Harri
    Saunavaara, Jani
    Alanen, Kalle
    Obsitnik, Branislav
    Minn, Heikki
    Lehotska, Viera
    Aronen, Hannu J.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2015, 41 (05) : 1394 - 1404
  • [22] Prebiopsy MRI and MRI-ultrasound Fusion-targeted Prostate Biopsy in Men With Previous Negative Biopsies: Impact on Repeat Biopsy Strategies
    Mendhiratta, Neil
    Meng, Xiaosong
    Rosenkrantz, Andrew B.
    Wysock, James S.
    Fenstermaker, Michael
    Huang, Richard
    Deng, Fang-Ming
    Melamed, Jonathan
    Zhou, Ming
    Huang, William C.
    Lepor, Herbert
    Taneja, Samir S.
    UROLOGY, 2015, 86 (06) : 1192 - 1198
  • [23] Combined Multiparametric MRI and Targeted Biopsies Improve Anterior Prostate Cancer Detection, Staging, and Grading
    Ouzzane, Adil
    Puech, Philippe
    Lemaitre, Laurent
    Leroy, Xavier
    Nevoux, Pierre
    Betrouni, Nacim
    Haber, Georges-Pascal
    Villers, Arnauld
    UROLOGY, 2011, 78 (06) : 1356 - 1362
  • [24] The CADMUS trial: A paired cohort, blinded study comparing multiparametric ultrasound targeted biopsies with multiparametric MRI targeted biopsies in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer
    Grey, A. D. R.
    Scott, R.
    Shah, B.
    Acher, P.
    Liyanage, S.
    Pavlou, M.
    Omar, R.
    Chinegwundoh, F.
    Patki, P.
    Shah, T. T.
    Hamid, S.
    Ghei, M.
    Brew-Graves, C.
    Arumainayagam, N.
    Chapman, A.
    Mcleavy, L.
    Alsaadi, Z.
    Karatziotou, A.
    Collins, T.
    Eldred-Evans, D.
    Freeman, A.
    Winkler, M.
    Emberton, M.
    Ahmed, H. U.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2021, 79 : S1301 - S1302
  • [25] Impact of prebiopsy mri on prostate cancer staging in the norwegian prostate cancer registry
    Haug, E. S.
    Myklebust, T. A.
    Julibo-Jones, P.
    Reisaeter, L.
    Aas, K.
    Berg, A.
    Mueller, C.
    Hofmann, B.
    Storkersen, O.
    Nilsen, K. L.
    Johannesen, T. B.
    Beisland, C.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2023, 83 : S138 - S139
  • [26] Prebiopsy Multiparametric MRI With Cancer-Negative Findings in Men With Suspected Prostate Cancer: Evaluation Using Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2
    Kim, Jun Gon
    Kim, Chan Kyo
    Kim, Jae-Hun
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2018, 211 (01) : 121 - 126
  • [27] ADDED VALUE OF SYSTEMATIC BIOPSIES IN MEN WITH ABNORMAL MULTIPARAMETRIC MRI UNDERGOING MRI-TRUS FUSION PROSTATE BIOPSY
    Freifeld, Yuval
    Xi, Yin
    Roehrborn, Claus
    Francis, Franto
    Passoni, Niccolo
    Lotan, Yair
    Goldberg, Kenneth
    Hornberger, Brad
    Margulis, Vitaly
    Pedrosa, Ivan
    Raj, Ganesh
    Cadeddu, Jeffrey
    Costa, Daniel
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (04): : E481 - E482
  • [28] The CADMUS trial: A paired cohort, blinded study comparing multiparametric ultrasound targeted biopsies with multiparametric MRI targeted biopsies in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.
    Grey, Alistair
    Scott, Rebecca
    Shah, Bina
    Acher, Peter
    Liyanage, Sidath
    Pavlou, Menelaos
    Omar, Rumana
    Chinegwundoh, Frank
    Patki, Prasad
    Campbell, Diane
    Shah, Taimur T.
    Hamid, Sami
    Brew-Graves, Chris
    Arumainayagam, Nim
    Chapman, Alex
    Eldred-Evans, David
    Freeman, Alex
    Winkler, Mathias
    Emberton, Mark
    Ahmed, Hashim Uddin
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 39 (15)
  • [29] MULTIPARAMETRIC MRI AND SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER
    Fandella, Andrea
    Di Toma, Francesco
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2012, 32 (05) : 1957 - 1958
  • [30] Multiparametric MRI in prostate cancer management
    Linda M. Johnson
    Baris Turkbey
    William D. Figg
    Peter L. Choyke
    Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, 2014, 11 (6) : 346 - 353