Prebiopsy Multiparametric MRI With Cancer-Negative Findings in Men With Suspected Prostate Cancer: Evaluation Using Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2

被引:5
|
作者
Kim, Jun Gon [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Chan Kyo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kim, Jae-Hun [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, 50 Ilwon Dong, Seoul 135710, South Korea
[2] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Samsung Med Ctr, Ctr Imaging Sci, 50 Ilwon Dong, Seoul 135710, South Korea
[3] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Dept Med Device Management & Res, SAIHST, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
biopsy; diagnosis; MRI; PI-RADS; prostate cancer; prostate multiparametric MRI; ULTRASOUND FUSION; TARGETED BIOPSY; OVERDIAGNOSIS; LOCALIZATION; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.17.18926
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to investigate the rates and characteristics of missed cancers at prebiopsy multiparametric MRI with cancer-negative findings according to the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2 in men with suspected prostate cancer (PCa). MATERIALS AND METHODS. A total of 584 consecutive men (biopsy naive, n = 392; repeated biopsy, n = 192) with suspected PCa who underwent prebiopsy 3-T multiparametric MRI, followed by subsequent biopsies, were enrolled. Cancer-positive findings were confirmed at systemic biopsies and cognitive MRI-targeted biopsies, whereas cancer-negative findings were confirmed at systemic biopsies performed during subsequent follow-up. Missing and detection rates of all PCa and clinically significant cancer according to five biopsy-based definitions were determined. The likelihood of PCa at multiparametric MRI was evaluated according to PI-RADS version 2, and the results were compared. RESULTS. Pathologically confirmed cancers were found in 25% of patients. Cancer-positive MRI findings were seen in 99 men (17%) and, of these, 85.9% had PCa. Of 485 men with cancer-negative MRI findings, a total of 61 (12.6%) had PCa, including 46 men in the biopsynaive group and 15 men in the repeated-biopsy group. For clinically significant cancers, the rate of missed cancers at MRI was 0.1-6.0%, and the detection rate was 21.2-83.5%. For detecting PCa, multiparametric MRI had 96.8% specificity, 87.2% accuracy, and 87.4% negative predictive value. CONCLUSION. Prebiopsy 3-T multiparametric MRI with cancer-negative findings missed approximately 12.6% of cases of PCa, including 0.1-6.0% of clinically significant cancers in a cohort of biopsy-naive men and those who had undergone repeated biopsy.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 126
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prospective evaluation of multiparametric MRI of prostate and the prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) version 2 for prostate cancer detection
    Lim, L. Y.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 26 : 22 - 23
  • [2] Prostate Cancer Detection with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 1 versus Version 2
    Feng, Zhao-Yan
    Wang, Liang
    Min, Xiang-De
    Wang, Shao-Gang
    Wang, Guo-Ping
    Cai, Jie
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 129 (20) : 2451 - 2459
  • [3] Prostate Cancer Detection with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 1 versus Version 2
    Feng ZhaoYan
    Wang Liang
    Min XiangDe
    Wang ShaoGang
    Wang GuoPing
    Cai Jie
    中华医学杂志英文版, 2016, 129 (20)
  • [4] Prospective Evaluation of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for Prostate Cancer Detection
    Mertan, Francesca V.
    Greer, Matthew D.
    Shih, Joanna H.
    George, Arvin K.
    Kongnyuy, Michael
    Muthigi, Akhil
    Merino, Maria J.
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Pinto, Peter A.
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Turkbey, Baris
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 196 (03): : 690 - 696
  • [5] The primacy of multiparametric MRI in men with suspected prostate cancer
    Richenberg, Jonathan
    Logager, Vibeke
    Panebianco, Valeria
    Rouviere, Olivier
    Villeirs, Geert
    Schoots, Ivo G.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (12) : 6940 - 6952
  • [6] The primacy of multiparametric MRI in men with suspected prostate cancer
    Jonathan Richenberg
    Vibeke Løgager
    Valeria Panebianco
    Olivier Rouviere
    Geert Villeirs
    Ivo G. Schoots
    European Radiology, 2019, 29 : 6940 - 6952
  • [7] Prostate Cancer and Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 Lesions Identified at Multiparametric Prostate MRI
    Ortman, Michael
    Kasson, Matthew
    Sidana, Abhinav
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2018, 210 (06) : W268 - W268
  • [8] INTERREADER AGREEMENT IN MULTIPARAMETRIC MRI REPORTING USING PROSTATE IMAGING REPORTING AND DATA SYSTEM VERSION 2.1
    Brembilla, Giorgio
    Dell'Oglio, Paolo
    Stabile, Armando
    Damascelli, Anna
    Cristel, Giulia
    Ravelli, Silvia
    Esposito, Antoinio
    Briganti, Alberto
    Montorsi, Francesco
    De Cobelli, Francesco
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 : E849 - E849
  • [9] Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for MRI of Prostate Cancer: Can We Do Better?
    Sackett, Jonathan
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Turkbey, Baris
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2019, 212 (06) : 1244 - 1252
  • [10] Impact of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System, Version 2, on MRI Diagnosis for Extracapsular Extension of Prostate Cancer
    Matsuoka, Yoh
    Ishioka, Junichiro
    Tanaka, Hiroshi
    Kimura, Tomo
    Yoshida, Soichiro
    Saito, Kazutaka
    Fujii, Yasuhisa
    Kihara, Kazunori
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2017, 209 (02) : W76 - W84