Prebiopsy Multiparametric MRI With Cancer-Negative Findings in Men With Suspected Prostate Cancer: Evaluation Using Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2

被引:5
|
作者
Kim, Jun Gon [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Chan Kyo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kim, Jae-Hun [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, 50 Ilwon Dong, Seoul 135710, South Korea
[2] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Samsung Med Ctr, Ctr Imaging Sci, 50 Ilwon Dong, Seoul 135710, South Korea
[3] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Dept Med Device Management & Res, SAIHST, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
biopsy; diagnosis; MRI; PI-RADS; prostate cancer; prostate multiparametric MRI; ULTRASOUND FUSION; TARGETED BIOPSY; OVERDIAGNOSIS; LOCALIZATION; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.17.18926
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to investigate the rates and characteristics of missed cancers at prebiopsy multiparametric MRI with cancer-negative findings according to the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2 in men with suspected prostate cancer (PCa). MATERIALS AND METHODS. A total of 584 consecutive men (biopsy naive, n = 392; repeated biopsy, n = 192) with suspected PCa who underwent prebiopsy 3-T multiparametric MRI, followed by subsequent biopsies, were enrolled. Cancer-positive findings were confirmed at systemic biopsies and cognitive MRI-targeted biopsies, whereas cancer-negative findings were confirmed at systemic biopsies performed during subsequent follow-up. Missing and detection rates of all PCa and clinically significant cancer according to five biopsy-based definitions were determined. The likelihood of PCa at multiparametric MRI was evaluated according to PI-RADS version 2, and the results were compared. RESULTS. Pathologically confirmed cancers were found in 25% of patients. Cancer-positive MRI findings were seen in 99 men (17%) and, of these, 85.9% had PCa. Of 485 men with cancer-negative MRI findings, a total of 61 (12.6%) had PCa, including 46 men in the biopsynaive group and 15 men in the repeated-biopsy group. For clinically significant cancers, the rate of missed cancers at MRI was 0.1-6.0%, and the detection rate was 21.2-83.5%. For detecting PCa, multiparametric MRI had 96.8% specificity, 87.2% accuracy, and 87.4% negative predictive value. CONCLUSION. Prebiopsy 3-T multiparametric MRI with cancer-negative findings missed approximately 12.6% of cases of PCa, including 0.1-6.0% of clinically significant cancers in a cohort of biopsy-naive men and those who had undergone repeated biopsy.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 126
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Prognostic Significance for Long-Term Outcomes Following Radical Prostatectomy in Men with Prostate Cancer: Evaluation with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2
    Kim, Ran
    Kim, Chan Kyo
    Park, Jung Jae
    Kim, Jae-Hun
    Seo, Seong Il
    Jeon, Seong Soo
    Lee, Hyun Moo
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 20 (02) : 256 - 264
  • [42] Correction to: Correlation of 3T multiparametric prostate MRI using prostate imaging reporting and data system (PIRADS) version 2 with biopsy as reference standard
    Shobhit Mathur
    Martin E. O’Malley
    Sangeet Ghai
    Kartik Jhaveri
    Boraiah Sreeharsha
    Myles Margolis
    Lehang Zhong
    Hassaan Maan
    Ants Toi
    Abdominal Radiology, 2020, 45 : 890 - 890
  • [43] PROSTATE IMAGING-REPORTING AND DATA SYSTEM VERSION 2 IN COMBINATION WITH CLINICAL PARAMETERS FOR PROSTATE CANCER DETECTION
    Wang, Lei
    Luo, Yi
    Liu, Tongzu
    Deng, Ming
    Wakimoto, Hiroaki
    Huang, Xing
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 209 : E108 - E108
  • [44] The Effectiveness of Prostate Imaging and Reporting and Data System Version 2 in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer with Screening Parameters Correlation
    Arik, Seref Barbaros
    Guvenir, Deniz
    Bozlar, Ugur
    Tasar, Mustafa
    Turgut, Bekir
    ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA, 2022, 75 (05): : 416 - 422
  • [45] Multiparametric MRI followed by targeted prostate biopsy for men with suspected prostate cancer: a clinical decision analysis
    Willis, Sarah R.
    Ahmed, Hashim U.
    Moore, Caroline M.
    Donaldson, Ian
    Emberton, Mark
    Miners, Alec H.
    van der Meulen, Jan
    BMJ OPEN, 2014, 4 (06):
  • [46] Risk of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Associated With Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 (Equivocal) Lesions Identified on Multiparametric Prostate MRI
    Sheridan, Alison D.
    Nath, Sameer K.
    Syed, Jamil S.
    Aneja, Sanjay
    Sprenkle, Preston C.
    Weinreb, Jeffrey C.
    Spektor, Michael
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2018, 210 (02) : 347 - 357
  • [47] Standardized Reporting of Prostate MRI: Comparison of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Version 1 and Version 2
    Tewes, Susanne
    Mokov, Nikolaj
    Hartung, Dagmar
    Schick, Volker
    Peters, Inga
    Schedl, Peter
    Pertschy, Stefanie
    Wacker, Frank
    Voshage, Goetz
    Hueper, Katja
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (09):
  • [48] Evaluation of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System for the Detection of Prostate Cancer by the Results of Targeted Biopsy of the Prostate
    Baur, Alexander D. J.
    Maxeiner, Andreas
    Franiel, Tobias
    Kilic, Ergin
    Huppertz, Alexander
    Schwenke, Carsten
    Hamm, Bernd
    Durmus, Tahir
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2014, 49 (06) : 411 - 420
  • [49] Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection After a Negative Prebiopsy MRI Examination: Comparison of Biparametric Versus Multiparametric MRI
    Gan, Jonathan M.
    Kikano, Elias G.
    Smith, Daniel A.
    Rao, Sanjay
    Podury, Ruchika
    Wang, Margaret
    Durieux, Jared C.
    Paspulati, Raj M.
    Ponsky, Lee
    Ramaiya, Nikhil H.
    Tirumani, Sree H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2022, 218 (05) : 859 - 866
  • [50] A meta-analysis of use of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 (PI-RADS V2) with multiparametric MR imaging for the detection of prostate cancer
    Li Zhang
    Min Tang
    Sipan Chen
    Xiaoyan Lei
    Xiaoling Zhang
    Yi Huan
    European Radiology, 2017, 27 : 5204 - 5214