Pupillographic evaluation of relative afferent pupillary defect in glaucoma patients

被引:21
|
作者
Ozeki, Naoki [1 ]
Yuki, Kenya [1 ]
Shiba, Daisuke [1 ]
Tsubota, Kazuo [1 ]
机构
[1] Keio Univ, Sch Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
Glaucoma; Pupil; Optic Nerve; Field of vision; NERVE; PERIMETRY; DISEASE; RETINA; HUMANS;
D O I
10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-303825
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Aim To evaluate the association between the magnitude of relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD) and the laterality of visual fields in glaucoma patients using pupillography. Methods Evaluations were made with an RAPDx (Konan Medical USA, Irvine, California, USA), which is designed to analyse pupil responses to multiple colour stimuli (white, red, green, blue, and yellow) at multiple controlled stimulus intensities. Humphrey automated perimetry (SITA standard 30-2) was performed to determine mean deviations (MDs), which were used to evaluate associations between MD differences (better eye MDworse eye MD) and RAPDx amplitude and latency measurements in pupil response to multiple colour stimuli. Results 58 glaucoma patients (35 men, 23 women; mean age: 62.612.8years; range 28-88years) were enrolled. The MD values were -2.00 +/- 3.1 (range -9.64 to 2.33) dB in the better eyes and -8.17 +/- 7.1 (range -26.33 to 1.07) dB in the worse eyes. The differences in MD values (better eye MDworse eye MD) were 6.17 +/- 6.1 (range 0.05-26.41) dB. The results of linear regression analysis between the log-scaled RAPD amplitudes and differences in MD values were as follows: white: R-2=0.45 (p<0.001), red: R-2=0.18 (p=0.002), green: R-2=0.30 (p<0.001), blue: R-2=0.29 (p<0.001), and yellow: R-2=0.32 (p<0.001). The log-scaled RAPD latencies and the differences in MD values were: white: R-2=0.17 (p=0.001), red: R-2=0.03 (p=0.22), green: R-2=0.01 (p=0.52), blue: R-2=0.1 (p=0.02), and yellow: R-2=0.05 (p=0.11). Conclusions The log-scaled RAPD amplitudes correlated moderately with the differences in MD values, but the log-scaled RAPD latencies showed a weaker correlation. Stimulation with white light produced the strongest correlation with differences in MD values.
引用
收藏
页码:1538 / 1542
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [32] Evaluation and Calibration of a Binocular Infrared Pupillometer for Measuring Relative Afferent Pupillary Defect
    Shwe-Tin, Audrey
    Smith, Guy T.
    Checketts, Daniel
    Murdoch, Ian E.
    Taylor, Daniel
    JOURNAL OF NEURO-OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2012, 32 (02) : 111 - 115
  • [33] OPTIC TRACT SYNDROME WITH RELATIVE AFFERENT PUPILLARY DEFECT
    TAKAHASHI, T
    HOHKI, T
    ENTANI, S
    YAMASHITA, H
    SHIBA, K
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1991, 35 (03) : 325 - 330
  • [34] RELATIVE AFFERENT PUPILLARY DEFECT WITH NORMAL VISUAL FUNCTION
    FORMAN, S
    BEHRENS, MM
    ODEL, JG
    SPECTOR, RT
    HILAL, S
    ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1990, 108 (08) : 1074 - 1075
  • [35] Slit lamp assessment of relative afferent pupillary defect
    Mekki, M. B.
    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2017, 95
  • [36] Relative afferent pupillary defect and suprathreshold automated perimetry
    Wilhelm, H
    Meilinger, S
    Apfelstedt, E
    KLINISCHE MONATSBLATTER FUR AUGENHEILKUNDE, 1997, 210 (06) : 365 - 369
  • [37] Objective characterization of the relative afferent pupillary defect in MS
    Blazek, Paul
    Davis, Scott L.
    Greenberg, Benjamin M.
    Conger, Amy
    Conger, Darrel
    Vernino, Steven
    Beh, Shin
    Stuve, Olaf
    Saidha, Shiv
    Ratchford, John N.
    Green, Ari
    Calabresi, Peter A.
    Balcer, Laura J.
    Frohman, Teresa C.
    Frohman, Elliot M.
    JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2012, 323 (1-2) : 193 - 200
  • [38] RELATIVE AFFERENT PUPILLARY DEFECT WITH NORMAL VISUAL FUNCTION
    SINOFF, SE
    ROSENBERG, M
    ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1992, 110 (04) : 447 - 448
  • [39] RELATIVE AFFERENT PUPILLARY DEFECT IN OPTIC TRACT HEMIANOPIAS
    BELL, RA
    THOMPSON, HS
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1978, 85 (04) : 538 - 540
  • [40] RELATIVE AFFERENT PUPILLARY DEFECT IN CONGENITAL OCCIPITAL HEMIANOPIA
    TYCHSEN, L
    HOYT, WF
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1985, 100 (02) : 345 - 346