Multi-criteria decision analysis of succinic acid production using hesitant fuzzy analytical hierarchy process

被引:4
|
作者
Kosamia, Niravkumar [1 ]
Sanchez, Arturo [2 ]
Rakshit, Sudip [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Lakehead Univ, Biorefining Res Inst BRI, 1294 Balmoral St, Thunder Bay, ON P7B 4T6, Canada
[2] Ctr Invest & Estudios Avanzados CINVESTAV, Unidad Guadalajara Ingn Avanzada, Lab Futuros Bioenergia, Zapopan 45019, Jalisco, Mexico
[3] Lakehead Univ, Chem Engn Dept, 955 Oliver Rd, Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1, Canada
关键词
Hesitant fuzzy AHP; Succinic acid; Multi-criteria decision analysis; Sustainability assessment; Biochemicals; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.indcrop.2023.117620
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
The selection of a large-scale succinic acid (SA) production process usually considers issues related to technology, economics, and the environment by performing techno-economic analysis (TEA) and life cycle assessment (LCA). This work improves such a decision-making process by additionally applying the hesitant fuzzy analytical hi-erarchy process (HFAHP) as a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) method considering expert's opinions in linguistic fuzzy terms. The production route is chosen from four alternatives. The first alternative (AL-1) utilizes both C-6 and C-5 sugar of corn stover for SA and lignin for electricity production. Alternative 2 produced SA, furfural, and electricity from C-6, C-5, and lignin respectively, whilst alternative 3 considered SA production from C-6 sugar and biogas from C-5 sugar for electricity production along with lignin. Alternative 4 produced SA using a fossil-based route. The HFAHP includes a hierarchical decision model consisting of an upper layer with two main criteria and a lower layer with four and three sub-criteria related to the main criteria techno-economics and the environment, respectively. Based on the preferences given by experts for the main criteria, sub-criteria and alternatives, the results indicated a higher weightage of the techno-economic criterion (55.0%) than the environmental criterion (45.0%). Waste (ST-2) and damage to resources (SE-3) were identified as the most influential sub-criteria with an assigned weightage of 32.0% and 34.0%, respectively. Least weightage (12.0%) was assigned to feedstock input (ST-3). An equal weightage (33.0%) was assigned to damages to human health (SE-1) and damages to the ecosystem (SE-2). AL-1 was found to be the best alternative with 35.0% weightage, followed by AL-3 (24.0%), AL-2 (22.0%), and AL-4 (19.0%). The sensitivity analysis demonstrated that AL-1 remains the best alternative and least sensitive in the range of 0.10-1.00 fraction variations of the main criteria weightage.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Sanitary landfill site selection using multi-criteria decision analysis and analytical hierarchy process: A case study in Azuay province, Ecuador
    Cobos Mora, Sandra Lucia
    Solano Pelaez, Jose Luis
    WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2020, 38 (10) : 1129 - 1141
  • [42] A hesitant fuzzy mathematical programming method for hybrid multi-criteria group decision making with hesitant fuzzy truth degrees
    Wan, Shu-Ping
    Qin, Ying-Li
    Dong, Jiu-Ying
    KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2017, 138 : 232 - 248
  • [43] Analyzing the state of development of Pune City by using multi-criteria decision analysis and analytic hierarchy process
    Komal Handore
    Varuvel Devadas
    GeoJournal, 2022, 87 : 631 - 674
  • [44] Analyzing the state of development of Pune City by using multi-criteria decision analysis and analytic hierarchy process
    Handore, Komal
    Devadas, Varuvel
    GEOJOURNAL, 2022, 87 (SUPPL 4) : 631 - 674
  • [45] Fuzzy multi-criteria acceptability analysis: A new approach to multi-criteria decision analysis under fuzzy environment
    Yatsalo, Boris
    Korobov, Alexander
    Martinez, L.
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2017, 84 : 262 - 271
  • [46] Identification of groundwater potential for urban development using multi-criteria decision- making method of analytical hierarchy process
    Pandian, Rajaveni Sundara
    Udayakumar, Sidesh
    Balaji, Kalyana Kumar Prasanna
    Narayanan, Ramabalan Lakshmi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND GEOSCIENCES, 2023, 8 (03): : 318 - 328
  • [47] MULTI-CRITERIA ASSESSMENT OF THE SMART GRID EFFICIENCY USING THE FUZZY ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS
    Janjic, Aleksandar
    Savic, Suzana
    Janackovic, Goran
    Stankovic, Miomir
    Velimirovic, Lazar
    FACTA UNIVERSITATIS-SERIES ELECTRONICS AND ENERGETICS, 2016, 29 (04) : 631 - 646
  • [48] Assessing the performance of residential energy management control Algorithms: Multi-criteria decision making using the analytical hierarchy process
    Omar, Farhad
    Bushby, Steven T.
    Williams, Ronald D.
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2019, 199 : 537 - 546
  • [49] Application of the GIS based multi-criteria decision analysis and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) in the flood susceptibility mapping (Tunisia)
    Salma Hammami
    Lahcen Zouhri
    Dhekra Souissi
    Ali Souei
    Adel Zghibi
    Amira Marzougui
    Mahmoud Dlala
    Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2019, 12
  • [50] Application of the GIS based multi-criteria decision analysis and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) in the flood susceptibility mapping (Tunisia)
    Hammami, Salma
    Zouhri, Lahcen
    Souissi, Dhekra
    Souei, Ali
    Zghibi, Adel
    Marzougui, Amira
    Dlala, Mahmoud
    ARABIAN JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES, 2019, 12 (21)