Multi-criteria decision analysis of succinic acid production using hesitant fuzzy analytical hierarchy process

被引:4
|
作者
Kosamia, Niravkumar [1 ]
Sanchez, Arturo [2 ]
Rakshit, Sudip [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Lakehead Univ, Biorefining Res Inst BRI, 1294 Balmoral St, Thunder Bay, ON P7B 4T6, Canada
[2] Ctr Invest & Estudios Avanzados CINVESTAV, Unidad Guadalajara Ingn Avanzada, Lab Futuros Bioenergia, Zapopan 45019, Jalisco, Mexico
[3] Lakehead Univ, Chem Engn Dept, 955 Oliver Rd, Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1, Canada
关键词
Hesitant fuzzy AHP; Succinic acid; Multi-criteria decision analysis; Sustainability assessment; Biochemicals; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.indcrop.2023.117620
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
The selection of a large-scale succinic acid (SA) production process usually considers issues related to technology, economics, and the environment by performing techno-economic analysis (TEA) and life cycle assessment (LCA). This work improves such a decision-making process by additionally applying the hesitant fuzzy analytical hi-erarchy process (HFAHP) as a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) method considering expert's opinions in linguistic fuzzy terms. The production route is chosen from four alternatives. The first alternative (AL-1) utilizes both C-6 and C-5 sugar of corn stover for SA and lignin for electricity production. Alternative 2 produced SA, furfural, and electricity from C-6, C-5, and lignin respectively, whilst alternative 3 considered SA production from C-6 sugar and biogas from C-5 sugar for electricity production along with lignin. Alternative 4 produced SA using a fossil-based route. The HFAHP includes a hierarchical decision model consisting of an upper layer with two main criteria and a lower layer with four and three sub-criteria related to the main criteria techno-economics and the environment, respectively. Based on the preferences given by experts for the main criteria, sub-criteria and alternatives, the results indicated a higher weightage of the techno-economic criterion (55.0%) than the environmental criterion (45.0%). Waste (ST-2) and damage to resources (SE-3) were identified as the most influential sub-criteria with an assigned weightage of 32.0% and 34.0%, respectively. Least weightage (12.0%) was assigned to feedstock input (ST-3). An equal weightage (33.0%) was assigned to damages to human health (SE-1) and damages to the ecosystem (SE-2). AL-1 was found to be the best alternative with 35.0% weightage, followed by AL-3 (24.0%), AL-2 (22.0%), and AL-4 (19.0%). The sensitivity analysis demonstrated that AL-1 remains the best alternative and least sensitive in the range of 0.10-1.00 fraction variations of the main criteria weightage.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Analytic Hierarchy Process for Hesitant Probabilistic Fuzzy Linguistic Set with Applications to Multi-criteria Group Decision-Making Method
    Singh, Akanksha
    Beg, Ismat
    Kumar, Sanjay
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2020, 22 (05) : 1596 - 1606
  • [12] Multi-criteria decision analysis by using fuzzy VIKOR
    Wang, Tien-Chin
    Liang, Jia-Ling
    Ho, Chun-Yen
    2006 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SERVICE SYSTEMS AND SERVICE MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1 AND 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, : 901 - 906
  • [13] The integration of analytical hierarchy process and data envelopment analysis in a multi-criteria decision-making problem
    Ahmad, Norita
    Berg, Daniel
    Simons, Gene R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2006, 5 (02) : 263 - 276
  • [14] Performance analysis of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process multi-criteria decision support models for contractor selection
    Afolayan, Abimbola H.
    Ojokoh, Bolanle A.
    Adetunmbi, Adebayo O.
    SCIENTIFIC AFRICAN, 2020, 9
  • [15] Normalization Techniques for Multi-Criteria Decision Making: Analytical Hierarchy Process Case Study
    Vafaei, Nazanin
    Ribeiro, Rita A.
    Camarinha-Matos, Luis M.
    TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION FOR CYBER-PHYSICAL SYSTEMS, 2016, 470 : 261 - 269
  • [16] Hesitant fuzzy information measures and their applications in multi-criteria decision making
    Hu, Junhua
    Zhang, Xiaolong
    Chen, Xiaohong
    Liu, Yongmei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS SCIENCE, 2016, 47 (01) : 62 - 76
  • [17] THE MULTI-CRITERIA HESITANT FUZZY GROUP DECISION MAKING WITH MULTIMOORA METHOD
    Zeng, Shouzhen
    Balezentis, Alvydas
    Su, Weihua
    ECONOMIC COMPUTATION AND ECONOMIC CYBERNETICS STUDIES AND RESEARCH, 2013, 47 (03): : 171 - 184
  • [18] Multi-criteria selection of electric power plants using analytical hierarchy process
    Akash, BA
    Mamlook, R
    Mohsen, MS
    ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 1999, 52 (01) : 29 - 35
  • [19] Multi-criteria selection of electric power plants using analytical hierarchy process
    Dept. of Mech. and Indust. Eng., Appl. Sci. Univ., Coll. Eng., 11931, Amman, Jordan
    不详
    Electr Power Syst Res, 1 (29-35):
  • [20] Multi-criteria Decision Analysis for Route Alignment Planning Using Geographical Information System (GIS) and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)
    Singh, Mukund Pratap
    Singh, Pitam
    Singh, Priyamvada
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF URBAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2024, 12 (01)