Retrospective Evaluation of Moderate Sedation Visits That Used Oral Meperidine and Hydroxyzine With Oral or Intranasal Midazolam

被引:0
|
作者
Jain, Gaurav [1 ]
Curran, Ronald [1 ]
Jones, Robert S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Sch Dent, Div Pediat Dent, Dept Surg & Dev Sci, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
behavior guidance; sedation; pediatric dentistry; meperidine; hydroxyzine; midazolam; intranasal; CHLORAL HYDRATE; NITROUS-OXIDE; PHARMACOKINETICS; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; DEXMEDETOMIDINE; FORMULATION; SUCCESS; EVENTS; NASAL;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: To examine the influence of substituting intranasal (IN) midazolam (MID) for oral ( PO) MID, within the three-drug combination of meperidine ( MEP), hydroxyzine (H) and MID, on sedation treatment outcomes. Methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional analysis examined patient variables and sedation outcomes in 508 pediatric dental patients sedated by single- and multi-drug seda-tion regimens (MEP-H; MEP-H-(PO)-MID; MEP-H-(IN)-MID; single-agent MID). The outcome assessment examined sedation visit effectiveness, sedation treatment completion, treatment time and medication administration to discharge time. Multi-variable logistic regression analyses assessed predictive variables associated with sedation visit effectiveness. Results: Both three-drug combinations (MEP-H-(PO)-MID; MEP-H-(IN)-MID) were used for behavior guidance in children of a similar age (median age=7.1 and 6.5 years, respectively, for the two drug combinations) and weight (median weight = 23.7 and 23.5 kg, respectively, for the two drug combinations). These three-drug com-binations had a higher likelihood of sedation effectiveness over the reference sedation regimen of single-agent midazolam ( MEP-H-(PO)-MID adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 2.65; 95 percent confidence interval [95% CI]=1.09 to 6.45; P=0.032; and MEP-H(IN)- MID OR=2.08; 95% CI=1.03 to 4.18; P=0.039). MEP-H-(IN)MID was asso-ciated with a shorter medication administration to discharge time for patients by 23 minutes (interquartile range [IQR]=9.5 to 34 minutes) compared to MEP- H-(PO) MID (P<0.05) while providing a comparable number of teeth treated (median=five). All sedation drug regimens, including MEP-H-(IN)MID, had high levels of oxygen saturation during all sedation appointments. Conclusion: Substituting IN for PO MID in MEP- H-MID was associated with a shorter total time to discharge while demonstrating comparable efficacy during sedation. ( J Dent Child 2023;90(3):139-46)
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 146
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Retrospective Study of 248 Pediatric Oral Sedations Utilizing the Combination of Meperidine and Hydroxyzine for Dental Treatment
    Lenahan, M.
    Wells, M.
    Scarbecz, M.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 2015, 39 (05) : 481 - 487
  • [22] Intravenous sedation with midazolam in oral surgery and implantology procedures A retrospective study
    Obreja, Karina
    Begic, Amira
    Kallab, Sandra
    Ruesseler, Miriam
    Bepler, Lena
    Sader, Robert
    Schwarz, Frank
    Parvini, Puria
    IMPLANTOLOGIE, 2022, 30 (03): : 313 - 324
  • [23] Comparison of Intranasal Midazolam with Oral Midazolam for Premedication in Children
    Janani
    Selvamani
    Purushotham, R.
    Bhagyavarthan, Botta
    RESEARCH JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL BIOLOGICAL AND CHEMICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 7 (06): : 2079 - 2087
  • [24] Oral chloral hydrate vs. intranasal midazolam for sedation during computerized tomography
    Fallah, Razieh
    Nakhaei, Mohammad Hosein Ataee
    Behdad, Shekofah
    Moghaddam, Reza Nafisi
    Shamszadeh, Ali
    INDIAN PEDIATRICS, 2013, 50 (02) : 233 - 235
  • [25] No statistical differences in success of sedation among midazolam and intranasal and oral ketamine in a small trial
    Brignardello-Petersen, Romina
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 2019, 150 (08): : E118 - E118
  • [26] Oral chloral hydrate vs. intranasal midazolam for sedation during computerized tomography
    Razieh Fallah
    Mohammad Hosein Ataee Nakhaei
    Shekofah Behdad
    Reza Nafisi Moghaddam
    Ali Shamszadeh
    Indian Pediatrics, 2013, 50 : 233 - 235
  • [27] Oral midazolam vs. intranasal dexmedetomidine plus oral midazolam for sedation of pediatric outpatients: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial
    Nie, Juan
    Chen, Chanchan
    Xie, Jing
    Ding, Guicong
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [28] Oral midazolam vs. intranasal dexmedetomidine plus oral midazolam for sedation of pediatric outpatients: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial
    Juan Nie
    Chanchan Chen
    Jing Xie
    Guicong Ding
    BMC Anesthesiology, 23
  • [29] Efficacy of oral midazolam for minimal and moderate sedation in pediatric patients: A systematic review
    Manso, Maria A.
    Guittet, Catherine
    Vandenhende, Francois
    Granier, Luc-Andre
    PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2019, 29 (11) : 1094 - 1106
  • [30] A COMPARISON OF INTRANASAL SUFENTANIL AND MIDAZOLAM TO INTRAMUSCULAR MEPERIDINE, PROMETHAZINE, AND CHLORPROMAZINE FOR CONSCIOUS SEDATION IN CHILDREN
    BATES, BA
    SCHUTZMAN, SA
    FLEISHER, GR
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1994, 24 (04) : 646 - 651