Access to care and satisfaction with care among fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries by level of care need

被引:2
|
作者
Park, Sungchul [1 ,2 ]
Chung, Wankyo [3 ]
Stimpson, Jim P. [4 ]
机构
[1] Korea Univ, Coll Hlth Sci, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, 145 Anam Ro, Seoul 02841, South Korea
[2] Korea Univ, FOUR R&E Ctr Learning Hlth Syst BK21, 145 Anam-ro, Seoul 02841, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Grad Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, 1 Gwanak Ro, Seoul 08826, South Korea
[4] Drexel Univ, Dornsife Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Management & Policy, 3215 Market St, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
Medicare; Care need; Disability; Care access; Care satisfaction; COST; QUALITY; INTENSITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.dhjo.2022.101402
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Variation among fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare beneficiaries by level of care need for access to care and satisfaction with care is unknown. Objective: We examined access to care and satisfaction with care among FFS Medicare beneficiaries by level of care need.Methods: We employed a cross-sectional study design. Using the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey, we categorized 17,967 FFS Medicare beneficiaries into six groups based on level of care need: the rela-tively healthy (11.0%), those with simple chronic conditions (26.1%), those with minor complex chronic conditions (28.6%), those with major complex chronic conditions (14.2%), the frail (6.2%), and the non -elderly disabled or end-stage renal disease (ESRD) (13.9%). Outcome measures included multiple in-dicators for access to care and satisfaction with care. For each outcome, we conducted a linear probability model while adjusting for individual-level and county-level characteristics and estimated the adjusted value of the outcome by level of care need.Results: The non-elderly disabled or ESRD were more likely to experience limited access to care and poor satisfaction with care than other five care need groups. Particularly, the rates of reporting trouble accessing needed medical care were the highest among the non-elderly disabled or ESRD (12.4% [95% CI: 9.6-15.3] vs. 2.1 [95% CI: 1.5-2.8] to 2.5 [95% CI: 1.6-3.5]). The leading reason for trouble accessing needed care among the non-elderly disabled or ESRD was attributable to affordability (59.6%).Conclusions: Policymakers need to develop targeted approaches to improve access to care and satis-faction with care for the non-elderly with a disability or ESRD.(c) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Variations in patterns of care and outcomes after acute myocardial infarction for Medicare beneficiaries in fee-for-service and HMO settings
    Luft, HS
    HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2003, 38 (04) : 1065 - 1079
  • [42] Outcomes Over 90-Day Episodes of Care in Medicare Fee-for-Service Beneficiaries Receiving Joint Arthroplasty
    Middleton, Addie
    Lin, Yu-Li
    Graham, James E.
    Ottenbacher, Kenneth J.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2017, 32 (09): : 2639 - +
  • [43] Access to care barriers among aged Medicare beneficiaries
    Porell, F
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2005, 45 : 426 - 426
  • [44] Comment on "Patterns of Postoperative Visits Among Medicare Fee-for-service Beneficiaries''
    Barney, Linda
    Senkowski, Christopher
    Ollapally, Vinita
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2019, 270 (06) : E144 - E144
  • [45] Frailty, social deprivation, and mortality among Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries
    Zhong, Lily
    Sison, Stephanie Denise M.
    Cheslock, Megan
    Liu, Yuchen
    Newmeyer, Natalie
    Kim, Dae Hyun
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2024,
  • [46] Hospice utilization among Medicare managed care and fee-for-service patients dying with cancer.
    Mccarthy, EP
    Burns, RB
    Davis, RB
    Ngo-Metzger, Q
    Phillips, RS
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2002, 17 : 180 - 180
  • [47] Quality of Care and Outcomes Among Medicare Advantage vs Fee-for-Service Medicare Patients Hospitalized With Heart Failure
    Figueroa, Jose F.
    Wadhera, Rishi K.
    Frakt, Austin B.
    Fonarow, Gregg C.
    Heidenreich, Paul A.
    Xu, Haolin
    Lytle, Barbara
    DeVore, Adam D.
    Matsouaka, Roland
    Yancy, Clyde W.
    Bhatt, Deepak L.
    Maddox, Karen E. Joynt
    JAMA CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 5 (12) : 1349 - 1357
  • [48] Differences in the structure of CAHPS® measures among the Medicare fee-for-service, Medicare managed care, and privately insured populations
    Bender, RH
    Garfinkel, SA
    HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2001, 36 (03) : 489 - 508
  • [49] Quality of care of medicare patients with diabetes in a metropolitan fee-for-service primary care integrated delivery system
    Hollander, P
    Nicewander, D
    Couch, C
    Winter, D
    Herrin, J
    Haydar, Z
    Ballard, DJ
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL QUALITY, 2005, 20 (06) : 344 - 352
  • [50] Access to care for rural Medicare beneficiaries
    Stearns, SC
    Slifkin, RT
    Edin, HM
    JOURNAL OF RURAL HEALTH, 2000, 16 (01): : 31 - 42