Access to care and satisfaction with care among fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries by level of care need

被引:2
|
作者
Park, Sungchul [1 ,2 ]
Chung, Wankyo [3 ]
Stimpson, Jim P. [4 ]
机构
[1] Korea Univ, Coll Hlth Sci, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, 145 Anam Ro, Seoul 02841, South Korea
[2] Korea Univ, FOUR R&E Ctr Learning Hlth Syst BK21, 145 Anam-ro, Seoul 02841, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Grad Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, 1 Gwanak Ro, Seoul 08826, South Korea
[4] Drexel Univ, Dornsife Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Management & Policy, 3215 Market St, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
Medicare; Care need; Disability; Care access; Care satisfaction; COST; QUALITY; INTENSITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.dhjo.2022.101402
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Variation among fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare beneficiaries by level of care need for access to care and satisfaction with care is unknown. Objective: We examined access to care and satisfaction with care among FFS Medicare beneficiaries by level of care need.Methods: We employed a cross-sectional study design. Using the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey, we categorized 17,967 FFS Medicare beneficiaries into six groups based on level of care need: the rela-tively healthy (11.0%), those with simple chronic conditions (26.1%), those with minor complex chronic conditions (28.6%), those with major complex chronic conditions (14.2%), the frail (6.2%), and the non -elderly disabled or end-stage renal disease (ESRD) (13.9%). Outcome measures included multiple in-dicators for access to care and satisfaction with care. For each outcome, we conducted a linear probability model while adjusting for individual-level and county-level characteristics and estimated the adjusted value of the outcome by level of care need.Results: The non-elderly disabled or ESRD were more likely to experience limited access to care and poor satisfaction with care than other five care need groups. Particularly, the rates of reporting trouble accessing needed medical care were the highest among the non-elderly disabled or ESRD (12.4% [95% CI: 9.6-15.3] vs. 2.1 [95% CI: 1.5-2.8] to 2.5 [95% CI: 1.6-3.5]). The leading reason for trouble accessing needed care among the non-elderly disabled or ESRD was attributable to affordability (59.6%).Conclusions: Policymakers need to develop targeted approaches to improve access to care and satis-faction with care for the non-elderly with a disability or ESRD.(c) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] PREDICTORS OF DISENROLLMENT AMONG MEDICARE FEE-FOR-SERVICE BENEFICIARIES WITH DEMENTIA
    Rivera-Hernandez, Maricruz
    Castillo, Aaron
    Trivedi, Amal
    INNOVATION IN AGING, 2021, 5 : 17 - 18
  • [32] Patterns of Postoperative Visits Among Medicare Fee-for-service Beneficiaries
    Kranz, Ashley M.
    Mulcahy, Andrew
    Ruder, Teague
    Lovejoy, Susan
    Mehrotra, Ateev
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2020, 271 (06) : 1056 - 1064
  • [33] Hospice use among Medicare managed care and fee-for-service patients dying with cancer
    McCarthy, EP
    Burns, RB
    Ngo-Metzger, Q
    Davis, RB
    Phillips, RS
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 289 (17): : 2238 - 2245
  • [34] Antipsychotic utilization, healthcare resource use and costs, and quality of care among fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries with schizophrenia in the United States
    Li, Pengxiang
    Benson, Carmela
    Geng, Zhi
    Seo, Sanghyuk
    Patel, Charmi
    Doshi, Jalpa A. A.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2023, 26 (01) : 525 - 536
  • [35] Association Between Hospital Efficiency and Quality of Care Among Fee-for-Service Medicare Beneficiaries with Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Chhatre, Sumedha
    Malkowicz, S. Bruce
    Vapiwala, Neha
    Guzzo, Thomas J.
    Jayadevappa, Ravishankar
    CANCERS, 2024, 16 (24)
  • [36] Patient Experiences of Integrated Care in Medicare Accountable Care Organizations and Medicare Advantage Versus Traditional Fee-for-Service
    Frean, Molly
    Covington, Christian
    Tietschert, Maike
    Bahadurzada, Hassina
    So, Jodi
    Singer, Sara J.
    MEDICAL CARE, 2021, 59 (03) : 195 - 201
  • [37] Persistence of High-Need Status Over Time Among Fee-for-Service Medicare Beneficiaries
    Keeney, Tamra
    Joyce, Nina R.
    Meyers, David J.
    Mor, Vincent
    Belanger, Emmanuelle
    MEDICAL CARE RESEARCH AND REVIEW, 2021, 78 (05) : 591 - 597
  • [38] Differences by Rurality in Satisfaction with Care Among Medicare Beneficiaries
    Henning-Smith, Carrie
    Hernandez, Ashley
    Neprash, Hannah
    Lahr, Megan
    JOURNAL OF RURAL HEALTH, 2021, 37 (01): : 114 - 123
  • [39] Bringing managed care incentives to Medicare's fee-for-service sector
    Tompkins, CP
    Wallack, SS
    Bhalotra, S
    Chilingerian, JA
    Glavin, MPV
    Ritter, GA
    Hodgkin, D
    HEALTH CARE FINANCING REVIEW, 1996, 17 (04): : 43 - 63
  • [40] Managed care market share, fee-for-service medicare, and information theory
    Blanco, C
    Olfson, M
    Blanco-Jerez, C
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 282 (03): : 235 - 236