Multiple Brain Metastases Radiosurgery with CyberKnife Device: Dosimetric Comparison between Fixed/Iris and Multileaf Collimator Plans

被引:2
|
作者
Ianiro, Anna [1 ]
Infusino, Erminia [1 ]
D'Andrea, Marco [1 ]
Marucci, Laura [2 ]
Farneti, Alessia [2 ]
Sperati, Francesca [3 ]
Cassano, Bartolomeo [1 ]
Ungania, Sara [1 ]
Soriani, Antonella [1 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS Regina Elena Natl Canc Inst, Dept Med Phys, Rome, Italy
[2] IRCCS Regina Elena Natl Canc Inst IFO, Dept Radiat Oncol, Rome, Italy
[3] IRCCS San Gallicano Dermatol Inst IFO, Dept Biostat & Bioinformat, Clin Trial Ctr, Rome, Italy
关键词
Brain radiosurgery; CyberKnife (R); dosimetric comparison; BODY RADIATION-THERAPY; STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY; QUALITY-ASSURANCE; RADIOTHERAPY; SURVIVAL; SYSTEM; IRRADIATION; NUMBER; CANCER;
D O I
10.4103/jmp.jmp_82_22
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: In our institution, stereotactic radiosurgery of multiple brain metastases is performed with the CyberKnife (R) (CK) device, using fixed/Iris collimators. In this study, nineteen fixed/Iris plans were recalculated with the multileaf collimator (MLC), to assess if it is possible to produce plans with comparable dosimetric overall quality. Materials and Methods: For consistent comparisons, MLC plans were re-optimized and re-normalized in order to achieve the same minimum dose for the total planning target volume (PTVtot). Conformation number (CN), homogeneity index (HI) and dose gradient index (DGI) metrics were evaluated. The dose to the brain was evaluated as the volume receiving 12 Gy (V-12) and as the integral dose (ID). The normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for brain radionecrosis was calculated as a function of V-12. Results: The reoptimized plans were reviewed by the radiation oncologist and were found clinically acceptable according to the The American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) Task Group-101 protocol. However, fixed/Iris plans provided significantly higher CN (+8.6%), HI (+2.2%), and DGI (+44.0%) values, and significantly lower ID values (-35.9%). For PTVtot less than the median value of 2.58cc, fixed/Iris plans provided significantly lower NTCP values. On the other side, MLC plans provided significantly lower treatment times (-18.4%), number of monitor units (-33.3%), beams (-46.0%) and nodes (-21.3%). Conclusions: CK-MLC plans for the stereotactic treatment of brain multi metastases could provide an important advantage in terms of treatment duration. However, to contain the increased risk for brain radionecrosis, it could be useful to calculate MLC plans only for patients with large PTVtot.
引用
收藏
页码:120 / 128
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The role of Cyberknife radiosurgery/radiotherapy for brain metastases of multiple or large-size tumors
    Nishizaki, T.
    Saito, K.
    Jimi, Y.
    Harada, N.
    Kajiwara, K.
    Nomura, S.
    Ishihara, H.
    Yoshikawa, K.
    Yoneda, H.
    Suzuki, M.
    Gibbs, I. C.
    MINIMALLY INVASIVE NEUROSURGERY, 2006, 49 (04) : 203 - 209
  • [42] Dosimetric comparison of Linac-based (BrainLAB®) and robotic radiosurgery (CyberKnife®) stereotactic system plans for acoustic schwannoma
    Dutta, Debnarayan
    Subramanian, S. Balaji
    Murli, V.
    Sudahar, H.
    Kurup, P. G. Gopalakrishna
    Potharaju, Mahadev
    JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2012, 106 (03) : 637 - 642
  • [43] Dosimetric comparison of Linac-based (BrainLAB®) and robotic radiosurgery (CyberKnife®) stereotactic system plans for acoustic schwannoma
    Debnarayan Dutta
    S. Balaji Subramanian
    V. Murli
    H. Sudahar
    P. G. Gopalakrishna Kurup
    Mahadev Potharaju
    Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 2012, 106 : 637 - 642
  • [44] HyperArc and CyberKnife dose distribution comparison for 1, 2, and 3 brain metastases radiosurgery
    Skrobala, A.
    Kijeska, W.
    Kruszyna-Mochalska, M.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2021, 161 : S1595 - S1595
  • [45] Dosimetric Comparison of MR-Linac and Cyberknife Plans for Non-spine Bone and Nodal Metastases
    Mehta, S.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 30 (06) : E51 - E51
  • [46] Effect of collimator angle on HyperArc stereotactic radiosurgery planning for single and multiple brain metastases
    Ohira, Shingo
    Sagawa, Tomohiro
    Ueda, Yoshihiro
    Inui, Shoki
    Masaoka, Akira
    Akino, Yuichi
    Mizuno, Hirokazu
    Miyazaki, Masayoshi
    Koizumi, Masahiko
    Teshima, Teruki
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2020, 45 (01) : 85 - 91
  • [47] Dosimetric Comparison between Single-Isocenter RapidArc and Multi-Isocenter Circular Cone Arc for Radiosurgery to Multiple Brain Metastases
    Dai, P.
    Zhang, P.
    Luo, L.
    Deng, G.
    Huang, Q.
    Cai, L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2018, 102 (03): : E508 - E508
  • [48] Dosimetric comparison of intensity modulated radiosurgery and helical tomotherapy for multiple intracranial metastases
    VanderSpek, L.
    Bauman, G.
    Wang, J.
    Yartsev, S.
    Murphy, K. T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2008, 72 (01): : S535 - S536
  • [49] Dosimetric quality and delivery efficiency of robotic radiosurgery for brain metastases: Comparison with C-arm linear accelerator based plans
    Zhang, Shuming
    Yang, Ruijie
    Wang, Xin
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 20 (11): : 104 - 110
  • [50] Dosimetrical comparison of brain SRS treatment plans using IRIS and InCise 2 MLC of the CyberKnife
    Vekas, M.
    Stelczer, G.
    Janvary, L.
    Major, T.
    Polgar, C.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2019, 133 : S997 - S998