Multiple Brain Metastases Radiosurgery with CyberKnife Device: Dosimetric Comparison between Fixed/Iris and Multileaf Collimator Plans

被引:2
|
作者
Ianiro, Anna [1 ]
Infusino, Erminia [1 ]
D'Andrea, Marco [1 ]
Marucci, Laura [2 ]
Farneti, Alessia [2 ]
Sperati, Francesca [3 ]
Cassano, Bartolomeo [1 ]
Ungania, Sara [1 ]
Soriani, Antonella [1 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS Regina Elena Natl Canc Inst, Dept Med Phys, Rome, Italy
[2] IRCCS Regina Elena Natl Canc Inst IFO, Dept Radiat Oncol, Rome, Italy
[3] IRCCS San Gallicano Dermatol Inst IFO, Dept Biostat & Bioinformat, Clin Trial Ctr, Rome, Italy
关键词
Brain radiosurgery; CyberKnife (R); dosimetric comparison; BODY RADIATION-THERAPY; STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY; QUALITY-ASSURANCE; RADIOTHERAPY; SURVIVAL; SYSTEM; IRRADIATION; NUMBER; CANCER;
D O I
10.4103/jmp.jmp_82_22
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: In our institution, stereotactic radiosurgery of multiple brain metastases is performed with the CyberKnife (R) (CK) device, using fixed/Iris collimators. In this study, nineteen fixed/Iris plans were recalculated with the multileaf collimator (MLC), to assess if it is possible to produce plans with comparable dosimetric overall quality. Materials and Methods: For consistent comparisons, MLC plans were re-optimized and re-normalized in order to achieve the same minimum dose for the total planning target volume (PTVtot). Conformation number (CN), homogeneity index (HI) and dose gradient index (DGI) metrics were evaluated. The dose to the brain was evaluated as the volume receiving 12 Gy (V-12) and as the integral dose (ID). The normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for brain radionecrosis was calculated as a function of V-12. Results: The reoptimized plans were reviewed by the radiation oncologist and were found clinically acceptable according to the The American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) Task Group-101 protocol. However, fixed/Iris plans provided significantly higher CN (+8.6%), HI (+2.2%), and DGI (+44.0%) values, and significantly lower ID values (-35.9%). For PTVtot less than the median value of 2.58cc, fixed/Iris plans provided significantly lower NTCP values. On the other side, MLC plans provided significantly lower treatment times (-18.4%), number of monitor units (-33.3%), beams (-46.0%) and nodes (-21.3%). Conclusions: CK-MLC plans for the stereotactic treatment of brain multi metastases could provide an important advantage in terms of treatment duration. However, to contain the increased risk for brain radionecrosis, it could be useful to calculate MLC plans only for patients with large PTVtot.
引用
收藏
页码:120 / 128
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dosimetric comparison of multileaf and fixed cone collimator plans with cyberknife
    Abakay, C. Demiroz
    Kiray, Z.
    Cetintas, S.
    Kurt, M.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2023, 182 : S1770 - S1771
  • [2] Dosimetric Comparison of Between Multileaf and Fixed Cone Collimator Plans with Cyberknife-M6 in the Benign Skull Base Tumors
    Abakay, Candan Demiroz
    Kiray, Zenciye
    UHOD-ULUSLARARASI HEMATOLOJI-ONKOLOJI DERGISI, 2023, 33 (03): : 152 - 157
  • [3] Dosimetric Impact of Multileaf Collimator Leaf Width On Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) RapidArc Treatment Plans for Single and Multiple Brain Metastases
    Hossain, S.
    Keeling, V.
    Ahmad, S.
    Algan, O.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (06) : 3409 - 3409
  • [4] Comparison of CyberKnife Multileaf Collimator and Fixed Cone: Treatment Planning Evaluation for Multiple Brain Metastasis
    Yang, K.
    Sharma, S.
    Yoon, J.
    Stephenson, S.
    McLawhorn, R.
    Patel, R.
    Ju, A.
    Feng, Y.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (06) : E417 - E417
  • [5] Dosimetric comparison between cone/Iris-based and InCise MLC-based CyberKnife plans for single and multiple brain metastases
    Jang, Si Young
    Lalonde, Ron
    Ozhasoglu, Cihat
    Burton, Steven
    Heron, Dwight
    Huq, M. Saiful
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 17 (05): : 184 - 199
  • [6] Dosimetric Comparison Between Two Multileaf Collimator Systems for Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Radiotherapy
    Asnaashari, K.
    Chow, J.
    Heydarian, M.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (06) : 3799 - 3799
  • [7] Dosimetric Comparison between Cyberknife and Linac Based Hyperarc Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases
    Singh, K. K.
    Cao, J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 51 (10) : 7952 - 7952
  • [8] A Mimetic Algorithm for Simultaneous Multileaf Collimator Aperture Shape and Dosimetric Optimization in CyberKnife Robotic Radiosurgery
    Witten, Matthew R.
    Clancey, Owen C.
    2015 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION (CEC), 2015, : 1589 - 1595
  • [9] Dosimetric comparison of fractionated radiosurgery plans using frameless Gamma Knife ICON and CyberKnife systems with linear accelerator-based radiosurgery plans for multiple large brain metastases
    Han, Eun Young
    Wang, He
    Luo, Dershan
    Li, Jing
    Wang, Xin
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 132 (05) : 1473 - 1479
  • [10] Dosimetric comparison between Tomotherapy and Cyberknife for radiosurgery of single brain metastasis
    Greto, D.
    Pallotta, S.
    Masi, L.
    Talamonti, C.
    Doro, R.
    Scoccianti, S.
    Marrazzo, L.
    Meattini, I.
    Bonomo, P.
    Livi, L.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2014, 111 : S138 - S138