Implementation of quantitative risk and cost-benefit analysis in an aging offshore facility

被引:0
|
作者
Lazuardi, Khoir [1 ,3 ]
Kumaraningrum, Anggraini Ratih [2 ]
Hermansyah, Heri [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Indonesia, Fac Engn, Dept Chem Engn, Depok, Indonesia
[2] Natl Res & Innovat Agcy, Bur Publ Commun Gen Affairs & Secretariat, Surabaya, Indonesia
[3] Univ Indonesia, Fac Engn, Dept Chem Engn, Depok, West Java, Indonesia
关键词
aging facility; cost-benefit analysis; gas leak; quantitative risk assessment; risk management; shutdown valve;
D O I
10.1002/prs.12558
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Riser shutdown valves (SDVs) are installed to isolate hydrocarbon through a subsea pipeline or to protect platforms and personnel from an unintended release of hydrocarbons. Unfortunately, the volume of gas leaking through the SDV is sometimes beyond the predetermined criteria. Therefore, a quantitative risk assessment is needed by conducting cost-benefit analysis (CBA). This is the methodology of this study. First, we carry out a frequency analysis to calculate the frequency of release from an isolatable section using an estimate of the release frequency, event tree analysis, and escalation from consequence modeling. Second, we study the consequences of modeling. Third, we carry out risk analysis and evaluation. Fourth, we do CBA calculation. Fifth, we consider the other perspectives. The results of this study can predict the possibility of riser SDV leakage in offshore facilities during the aging period and optimize operating and investment costs while maintaining safety to reduce the possibility of fire explosions. It poses a challenge because of the complexity of operational systems involving multiple potential contributors and multiple safety measures. The study results show that the probability of fire prediction at SDV with processing facilities increases from 8.10 x 10-09 to 7.93 x 10-05 for the worst case scenario. Case studies show that application of the CBA model can be used to optimize the allocation of safety investments.
引用
收藏
页码:S116 / S127
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] On justifying cost-benefit analysis
    Kornhauser, LA
    JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES, 2000, 29 (02): : 1037 - 1057
  • [42] Cost-benefit risk of renewable energy
    Hsu, K. -J.
    ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND INVESTMENT ASSESSMENT III, 2010, 131 : 85 - 94
  • [43] Cost-Benefit Analysis of the Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery Program in Liver Surgery
    Joliat, Gaetan-Romain
    Labgaa, Ismail
    Hubner, Martin
    Blanc, Catherine
    Griesser, Anne-Claude
    Schafer, Markus
    Demartines, Nicolas
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 40 (10) : 2441 - 2450
  • [44] A Cost-Benefit Analysis for Utility-Scale Agrivoltaic Implementation in Italy
    Di Francia, Girolamo
    Cupo, Paolo
    ENERGIES, 2023, 16 (07)
  • [45] Social vulnerability in cost-benefit analysis for flood risk management
    Kind, Jarl
    Botzen, W. J. Wouter
    Aerts, Jeroen C. J. H.
    ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2020, 25 (02) : 115 - 134
  • [46] The ALARP Principle in the Cost-Benefit Analysis for the Acceptability of Investment Risk
    Nestico, Antonio
    He, Shuquan
    De Mare, Gianluigi
    Benintendi, Renato
    Maselli, Gabriella
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (12)
  • [47] A cost-benefit analysis of capital requirements adjusted for model risk
    Farkas, Walter
    Fringuellotti, Fulvia
    Tunaru, Radu
    JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2020, 65
  • [48] Sprinklers for property protection - decision based on quantitative cost-benefit risk assessment
    Poh, W.
    Bennetts, I.
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2005, 6 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [49] COST-BENEFIT AND COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS
    SCHOR, IM
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1981, 304 (07): : 432 - 432
  • [50] Cost-Benefit Assessment of Offshore Structures Considering Structural Deterioration
    Varela, Gerardo
    Tolentino, Dante
    JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2023, 11 (07)