Implementation of quantitative risk and cost-benefit analysis in an aging offshore facility

被引:0
|
作者
Lazuardi, Khoir [1 ,3 ]
Kumaraningrum, Anggraini Ratih [2 ]
Hermansyah, Heri [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Indonesia, Fac Engn, Dept Chem Engn, Depok, Indonesia
[2] Natl Res & Innovat Agcy, Bur Publ Commun Gen Affairs & Secretariat, Surabaya, Indonesia
[3] Univ Indonesia, Fac Engn, Dept Chem Engn, Depok, West Java, Indonesia
关键词
aging facility; cost-benefit analysis; gas leak; quantitative risk assessment; risk management; shutdown valve;
D O I
10.1002/prs.12558
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Riser shutdown valves (SDVs) are installed to isolate hydrocarbon through a subsea pipeline or to protect platforms and personnel from an unintended release of hydrocarbons. Unfortunately, the volume of gas leaking through the SDV is sometimes beyond the predetermined criteria. Therefore, a quantitative risk assessment is needed by conducting cost-benefit analysis (CBA). This is the methodology of this study. First, we carry out a frequency analysis to calculate the frequency of release from an isolatable section using an estimate of the release frequency, event tree analysis, and escalation from consequence modeling. Second, we study the consequences of modeling. Third, we carry out risk analysis and evaluation. Fourth, we do CBA calculation. Fifth, we consider the other perspectives. The results of this study can predict the possibility of riser SDV leakage in offshore facilities during the aging period and optimize operating and investment costs while maintaining safety to reduce the possibility of fire explosions. It poses a challenge because of the complexity of operational systems involving multiple potential contributors and multiple safety measures. The study results show that the probability of fire prediction at SDV with processing facilities increases from 8.10 x 10-09 to 7.93 x 10-05 for the worst case scenario. Case studies show that application of the CBA model can be used to optimize the allocation of safety investments.
引用
收藏
页码:S116 / S127
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] COST-BENEFIT AND PROCEDURE BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF INFANTS AT RISK FOR OCCULT BACTEREMIA
    STEPHAN, M
    BAKER, RC
    BAUSHER, JC
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DISEASES OF CHILDREN, 1990, 144 (04): : 422 - 422
  • [12] QUANTITATIVE COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF GREEN COURSES: CASE STUDY
    Nakhoul, Imad
    Safieddine, Fadi
    INTED2015: 9TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE, 2015, : 3476 - 3482
  • [13] Cost-Benefit Analysis and Risk in Socioeconomic Evaluation of Projects
    Sieber, Patrik
    Hnilica, Jiri
    EKONOMICKY CASOPIS, 2011, 59 (07): : 669 - 683
  • [14] Cost-benefit analysis of HACCP implementation in the Mexican meat industry
    Maldonado, ES
    Henson, SJ
    Caswell, JA
    Leos, LA
    Martinez, PA
    Aranda, G
    Cadena, JA
    FOOD CONTROL, 2005, 16 (04) : 375 - 381
  • [15] A cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis of Vancouver's supervised injection facility
    Andresen, Martin A.
    Boyd, Neil
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY, 2010, 21 (01) : 70 - 76
  • [16] RISK-BENEFIT AND COST-BENEFIT METHODOLOGY
    EICHHOLZ, GG
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN NUCLEAR SOCIETY, 1975, 22 (NOV16): : 83 - 84
  • [17] The Cost-Benefit Fallacy: Why Cost-Benefit Analysis Is Broken and How to Fix It
    Flyvbjerg, Bent
    Bester, Dirk W.
    JOURNAL OF BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS, 2021, 12 (03) : 395 - 419
  • [18] Cost-Benefit Analysis in Reasoning
    Alaoui, Larbi
    Penta, Antonio
    JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2022, : 881 - 925
  • [19] Beware the cost-benefit analysis
    Spence, Des
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 345
  • [20] Incommensurability and cost-benefit analysis
    Adler, M
    UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW REVIEW, 1998, 146 (05) : 1371 - 1418