Implementation of quantitative risk and cost-benefit analysis in an aging offshore facility

被引:0
|
作者
Lazuardi, Khoir [1 ,3 ]
Kumaraningrum, Anggraini Ratih [2 ]
Hermansyah, Heri [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Indonesia, Fac Engn, Dept Chem Engn, Depok, Indonesia
[2] Natl Res & Innovat Agcy, Bur Publ Commun Gen Affairs & Secretariat, Surabaya, Indonesia
[3] Univ Indonesia, Fac Engn, Dept Chem Engn, Depok, West Java, Indonesia
关键词
aging facility; cost-benefit analysis; gas leak; quantitative risk assessment; risk management; shutdown valve;
D O I
10.1002/prs.12558
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Riser shutdown valves (SDVs) are installed to isolate hydrocarbon through a subsea pipeline or to protect platforms and personnel from an unintended release of hydrocarbons. Unfortunately, the volume of gas leaking through the SDV is sometimes beyond the predetermined criteria. Therefore, a quantitative risk assessment is needed by conducting cost-benefit analysis (CBA). This is the methodology of this study. First, we carry out a frequency analysis to calculate the frequency of release from an isolatable section using an estimate of the release frequency, event tree analysis, and escalation from consequence modeling. Second, we study the consequences of modeling. Third, we carry out risk analysis and evaluation. Fourth, we do CBA calculation. Fifth, we consider the other perspectives. The results of this study can predict the possibility of riser SDV leakage in offshore facilities during the aging period and optimize operating and investment costs while maintaining safety to reduce the possibility of fire explosions. It poses a challenge because of the complexity of operational systems involving multiple potential contributors and multiple safety measures. The study results show that the probability of fire prediction at SDV with processing facilities increases from 8.10 x 10-09 to 7.93 x 10-05 for the worst case scenario. Case studies show that application of the CBA model can be used to optimize the allocation of safety investments.
引用
收藏
页码:S116 / S127
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] FACILITY FIELD MONITORING COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
    ANNO, GH
    MONTGOMERY, H
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN NUCLEAR SOCIETY, 1975, 21 (JUN): : 89 - 90
  • [2] Cost-benefit AHPSort for performance analysis of offshore providers
    Ishizaka, Alessio
    Lopez, Cristina
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2019, 57 (13) : 4261 - 4277
  • [3] Ecological and economic cost-benefit analysis of offshore wind energy
    Snyder, Brian
    Kaiser, Mark J.
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2009, 34 (06) : 1567 - 1578
  • [4] COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS FOR OFFSHORE STRUCTURES UNDER STRUCTURAL DETERIORATION
    Varela, Gerardo
    Flores, Ricardo B.
    Tolentino, Dante
    PROCEEDINGS OF ASME 2024 43RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OCEAN, OFFSHORE AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING, OMAE2024, VOL 2, 2024,
  • [5] Cost-Benefit Analysis Developing Offshore Wind Energy in China
    Liu, Ru
    Zhao, Junchao
    Li, Hui
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ENERGY SCIENCE AND CHEMICAL ENGINEERING (ISESCE 2015), 2016, 45 : 374 - 378
  • [6] Cost-benefit analysis of Donghai Bridge offshore wind farm
    Wu, Chen Sheng
    Liu, Ru
    Song, Chen
    Zhang, Lu Ji
    COMPUTING, CONTROL, INFORMATION AND EDUCATION ENGINEERING, 2015, : 245 - 247
  • [7] Guidelines and Cost-Benefit Analysis of the Structural Health Monitoring Implementation in Offshore Wind Turbine Support Structures
    Martinez-Luengo, Maria
    Shafiee, Mahmood
    ENERGIES, 2019, 12 (06)
  • [8] Cost-benefit analysis
    Miura, Grant
    NATURE CHEMICAL BIOLOGY, 2018, 14 (10) : 903 - 903
  • [9] COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
    BJORNSTAD, P
    KJEMI, 1975, 35 (10): : 3 - 3
  • [10] Cost-benefit optimization and risk acceptability for existing, aging but maintained structures
    Streicher, H.
    Joanni, A.
    Rackwitz, R.
    STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2008, 30 (05) : 375 - 393