Intergroup Bias in Political Decision Making

被引:2
|
作者
Gilliland, Darby [1 ]
Warner, Benjamin R. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Villamil, Astrid [2 ]
Jennings, Fred J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arkansas, Dept Commun, Fayetteville, AR USA
[2] Univ Missouri, Dept Commun, Columbia, MO USA
[3] Univ Missouri, Dept Commun, 108 Switzler Hall, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
关键词
Social Identity Theory; Political Communication; Campaign Communication; Motivated Reasoning; SOCIAL IDENTITY; INGROUP FAVORITISM; FIT INDEXES; IN-GROUP; IMPACT; IDENTIFICATION; INFORMATION; IDEOLOGY; ELECTION; DISCRIMINATION;
D O I
10.1080/10510974.2023.2222282
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Partisanship is a driving factor of vote choice; however, the mechanism of influence is nuanced. Political parties operate as social identities that motivate elaboration about a candidate and bias image perceptions. In other words, partisanship influences the way in which individuals process information and form political opinions. This influence stems from the processes of ingroup favoritism and outgroup denigration. The present study employs an experimental design and an identity-motivated elaborative theoretical perspective to analyze the elaborative and perceptual process of determining candidate support. Though both congruent and incongruent partisan social identities influence intentions to vote for a candidate, they do so at different strengths and through different information-processing mechanisms. Specifically, ingroup favoritism is primarily automatic, whereas outgroup denigration is both deliberative and automatic.
引用
收藏
页码:428 / 446
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Confirmation bias in medical decision-making
    Elston, Dirk M.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2020, 82 (03) : 572 - 572
  • [42] Cognitive Bias: The Downside of Shared Decision Making
    Ozdemir, Semra
    Finkelstein, Eric Andrew
    JCO CLINICAL CANCER INFORMATICS, 2018, 2
  • [43] The Salience Bias in Ensemble Decision-Making
    Haroz, Steve
    PERCEPTION, 2021, 50 (1_SUPPL) : 38 - 38
  • [44] DOGMATISM AND INTERGROUP BIAS
    DION, KL
    REPRESENTATIVE RESEARCH IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1973, 4 (02) : 1 - 10
  • [45] Racial bias in cesarean decision-making
    Edwards, Sara E.
    Class, Quetzal A.
    Ford, Catherine E.
    Alexander, Tamika A.
    Fleisher, Jonah D.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2023, 5 (05)
  • [46] Affective decision making: A theory of optimism bias
    Bracha, Anat
    Brown, Donald J.
    GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 2012, 75 (01) : 67 - 80
  • [47] Prosocial Preferences Condition Decision Effort and Ingroup Biased Generosity in Intergroup Decision-Making
    Rahal, Rima-Maria
    Fiedler, Susann
    De Dreu, Carsten K. W.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [48] Prosocial Preferences Condition Decision Effort and Ingroup Biased Generosity in Intergroup Decision-Making
    Rima-Maria Rahal
    Susann Fiedler
    Carsten K. W. De Dreu
    Scientific Reports, 10
  • [49] Cognitive and human factors in legal layperson decision making: Sources of bias in juror decision making
    Curley, Lee J.
    Munro, James
    Dror, Itiel E.
    MEDICINE SCIENCE AND THE LAW, 2022, 62 (03) : 206 - 215
  • [50] Cognitive bias, decision styles, and risk attitudes in decision making and DSS
    Phillips-Wren, Gloria
    Power, Daniel J.
    Mora, Manuel
    JOURNAL OF DECISION SYSTEMS, 2019, 28 (02) : 63 - 66