Intergroup Bias in Political Decision Making

被引:2
|
作者
Gilliland, Darby [1 ]
Warner, Benjamin R. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Villamil, Astrid [2 ]
Jennings, Fred J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arkansas, Dept Commun, Fayetteville, AR USA
[2] Univ Missouri, Dept Commun, Columbia, MO USA
[3] Univ Missouri, Dept Commun, 108 Switzler Hall, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
关键词
Social Identity Theory; Political Communication; Campaign Communication; Motivated Reasoning; SOCIAL IDENTITY; INGROUP FAVORITISM; FIT INDEXES; IN-GROUP; IMPACT; IDENTIFICATION; INFORMATION; IDEOLOGY; ELECTION; DISCRIMINATION;
D O I
10.1080/10510974.2023.2222282
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Partisanship is a driving factor of vote choice; however, the mechanism of influence is nuanced. Political parties operate as social identities that motivate elaboration about a candidate and bias image perceptions. In other words, partisanship influences the way in which individuals process information and form political opinions. This influence stems from the processes of ingroup favoritism and outgroup denigration. The present study employs an experimental design and an identity-motivated elaborative theoretical perspective to analyze the elaborative and perceptual process of determining candidate support. Though both congruent and incongruent partisan social identities influence intentions to vote for a candidate, they do so at different strengths and through different information-processing mechanisms. Specifically, ingroup favoritism is primarily automatic, whereas outgroup denigration is both deliberative and automatic.
引用
收藏
页码:428 / 446
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Linguistic intergroup bias in political communication
    Anolli, Luigi
    Zurloni, Valentino
    Riva, Giuseppe
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 133 (03): : 237 - 255
  • [2] Intergroup Conflict and Rational Decision Making
    Martinez-Tur, Vicente
    Penarroja, Vicente
    Serrano, Miguel A.
    Hidalgo, Vanesa
    Moliner, Carolina
    Salvador, Alicia
    Alacreu-Crespo, Adrian
    Gracia, Esther
    Molina, Agustin
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (12):
  • [3] Exaggerated Intergroup Bias in Economical Decision Making Games: Differential Effects of Primary and Secondary Psychopathic Traits
    Gillespie, Steven M.
    Mitchell, Ian J.
    Johnson, Ian
    Dawson, Ellen
    Beech, Anthony R.
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (08):
  • [4] Intergroup context of social identity and group decision making
    Ghosh, ESK
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 35 (3-4) : 410 - 410
  • [5] Intergroup bias
    Hewstone, M
    Rubin, M
    Willis, H
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 53 : 575 - 604
  • [6] Religion and Political Decision Making
    Evans, Michael S.
    JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENTIFIC STUDY OF RELIGION, 2014, 53 (01) : 145 - 163
  • [7] Political Risk in Decision Making
    Stein, Guido
    Ramos Suarez, Eduardo
    REVISTA EMPRESA Y HUMANISMO, 2015, 18 (01) : 115 - 137
  • [8] PROBLEMS OF POLITICAL DECISION MAKING
    BOHRET, C
    POLITISCHE VIERTELJAHRESSCHRIFT, 1967, 8 (04) : 608 - 624
  • [9] Publication bias in editorial decision making
    Olson, CM
    Rennie, D
    Cook, D
    Dickersin, K
    Flanagin, A
    Hogan, JW
    Zhu, Q
    Reiling, J
    Pace, B
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 287 (21): : 2825 - 2828
  • [10] Shared Decision Making and Human Bias
    Pompili, Cecilia
    Brunelli, Alessandro
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2023, 115 (02): : 361 - 362