Group Prenatal Care vs. Traditional Prenatal Care: A Parity-Matched Comparison of Perinatal Outcomes in a Rural Community

被引:2
|
作者
Jones, Talitha H. [1 ]
Crump, William J. [1 ]
Foster, Shannon M. [2 ]
Mullins, Samantha J. [2 ]
Farris, Alicia N. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Louisville, Sch Med, Baptist Hlth Madisonville, Trover Campus,200 Clin Dr, 3rd North, Madisonville, KY 42431 USA
[2] Univ Tennessee Nashville Family Med Residency, 1020 N Highland Ave Murfreesboro, Murfreesboro, TN 37130 USA
[3] Mem Hlth Obstet & Gynecol Residency, 4700 Waters Ave, Savannah, GA 31404 USA
关键词
Traditional prenatal care; Group prenatal care; Rural health care; Perinatal outcomes; PRETERM BIRTH; WEIGHT; TRIAL; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s10995-023-03600-z
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
SignificanceWe provide a comprehensive table comparingprevious studies of group care with a focus on differences in the populationsstudied. Ours is the first to provide perinatal outcomes from a ruralpopulation in the US and only the second to match for parity, a keypredictor. Our groups were smaller than previous reports, but our completematching on parity and contemporaneous delivery of the control group are strengths. We found no difference intraditional perinatal outcome, but group care patients reported higher rates ofbreastfeeding and not smoking, a difference only found in two previousurban-based reports. PurposePrenatal care is important for positive outcomes for both mother and infant. The traditional one-on-one method remains the most common. This study aimed to compare perinatal outcomes of patients attending group prenatal care with traditional prenatal care. Most previously published comparisons did not match for parity, a key predictor of perinatal outcome.DescriptionWe collected perinatal outcome data for 137group prenatal care patients and 137 traditional prenatal care patients,matched for contemporaneous delivery and parity, who delivered at our smallrural hospital during 2015-2016. We included key public health variables,including the initiation of breastfeeding, and smoking at the time of delivery.AssessmentThere was no difference between the two groups for maternal age or infant ethnicity, induced or augmented labor, preterm deliveries, APGAR scores less than 7, low birth weight, NICU admissions, or cesarean deliveries. Group care patients had more prenatal visits and were more likely to initiate breastfeeding and were less likely to report smoking at the time of delivery.ConclusionIn our rural population matched for contemporaneous delivery and parity, we found no difference in traditional perinatal outcome measures and that group care was positively associated with the key public health variables of not smoking and initiating breastfeeding. If future studies in other populations have similar findings, it may be wise to provide group care more widely to rural populations.
引用
收藏
页码:575 / 581
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Influence of Group Versus Individual Prenatal Care on Phase of Labor at Hospital Admission, and Gestational Weight Gain and Breastfeeding Outcomes in Group Prenatal Care
    Niemczyk, Nancy A.
    JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH, 2017, 62 (01) : 127 - 127
  • [42] A Comparison of Health Behaviors of Women in Centering Pregnancy and Traditional Prenatal Care
    Shakespear, Kaylynn
    Waite, Phillip J.
    Gast, Julie
    MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH JOURNAL, 2010, 14 (02) : 202 - 208
  • [43] A Comparison of Health Behaviors of Women in Centering Pregnancy and Traditional Prenatal Care
    Kaylynn Shakespear
    Phillip J. Waite
    Julie Gast
    Maternal and Child Health Journal, 2010, 14 : 202 - 208
  • [44] COMPARISON OF ADOLESCENT PREGNANCY OUTCOMES BY PRENATAL-CARE SOURCE
    MORRIS, DL
    BERENSON, AB
    LAWSON, J
    WIEMANN, CM
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 1993, 38 (05) : 375 - 380
  • [45] A Comparison of Prenatal Care in Mothers with and without JIA: Association with Outcomes
    Feldman, Debbie Ehrmann
    Berard, Anick
    Vinet, Evelyne
    Duffy, Ciaran M.
    Hazel, Elizabeth
    Sylvestre, Marie-Pierre
    Meshefedjian, Garbis
    Bernatsky, Sasha
    ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY, 2015, 67
  • [46] Number of prenatal care visits in term deliveries: Decreased numbers and perinatal outcomes
    Wong, Luchin
    Cheng, Yvonne
    Caughey, Aaron
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 197 (06) : S89 - S89
  • [47] Relationship between the number of prenatal care visits and the occurrence of adverse perinatal outcomes
    Davi Rodrigues, Karine Mendonca
    Zoldan, Camila
    de Oliveira Silva, Clarissa Bernardes
    Martins Santana, Eduardo Felix
    Araujo Junior, Edward
    Peixoto, Alberto Borges
    REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2022, 68 (02): : 256 - 260
  • [48] Evaluating Centering group prenatal care in rural women with low socioeconomic status to promote access to care and improve pregnancy outcomes
    Sherrika Walton
    Kristina Roberson
    Elijah O. Onsomu
    Susan Hall
    Cathy Dearman
    Journal of Public Health, 2021, 29 : 285 - 291
  • [49] Evaluating Centering group prenatal care in rural women with low socioeconomic status to promote access to care and improve pregnancy outcomes
    Walton, Sherrika
    Roberson, Kristina
    Onsomu, Elijah O.
    Hall, Susan
    Dearman, Cathy
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH-HEIDELBERG, 2021, 29 (02): : 285 - 291
  • [50] Group vs Individual Prenatal Care and Gestational Diabetes Outcomes A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial
    Chen, Yixin
    Crockett, Amy H.
    Britt, Jessica L.
    Zhang, Lu
    Nianogo, Roch A.
    Qian, Tianchen
    Nan, Bin
    Chen, Liwei
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2023, 6 (08) : e2330763