Group Prenatal Care vs. Traditional Prenatal Care: A Parity-Matched Comparison of Perinatal Outcomes in a Rural Community

被引:2
|
作者
Jones, Talitha H. [1 ]
Crump, William J. [1 ]
Foster, Shannon M. [2 ]
Mullins, Samantha J. [2 ]
Farris, Alicia N. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Louisville, Sch Med, Baptist Hlth Madisonville, Trover Campus,200 Clin Dr, 3rd North, Madisonville, KY 42431 USA
[2] Univ Tennessee Nashville Family Med Residency, 1020 N Highland Ave Murfreesboro, Murfreesboro, TN 37130 USA
[3] Mem Hlth Obstet & Gynecol Residency, 4700 Waters Ave, Savannah, GA 31404 USA
关键词
Traditional prenatal care; Group prenatal care; Rural health care; Perinatal outcomes; PRETERM BIRTH; WEIGHT; TRIAL; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s10995-023-03600-z
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
SignificanceWe provide a comprehensive table comparingprevious studies of group care with a focus on differences in the populationsstudied. Ours is the first to provide perinatal outcomes from a ruralpopulation in the US and only the second to match for parity, a keypredictor. Our groups were smaller than previous reports, but our completematching on parity and contemporaneous delivery of the control group are strengths. We found no difference intraditional perinatal outcome, but group care patients reported higher rates ofbreastfeeding and not smoking, a difference only found in two previousurban-based reports. PurposePrenatal care is important for positive outcomes for both mother and infant. The traditional one-on-one method remains the most common. This study aimed to compare perinatal outcomes of patients attending group prenatal care with traditional prenatal care. Most previously published comparisons did not match for parity, a key predictor of perinatal outcome.DescriptionWe collected perinatal outcome data for 137group prenatal care patients and 137 traditional prenatal care patients,matched for contemporaneous delivery and parity, who delivered at our smallrural hospital during 2015-2016. We included key public health variables,including the initiation of breastfeeding, and smoking at the time of delivery.AssessmentThere was no difference between the two groups for maternal age or infant ethnicity, induced or augmented labor, preterm deliveries, APGAR scores less than 7, low birth weight, NICU admissions, or cesarean deliveries. Group care patients had more prenatal visits and were more likely to initiate breastfeeding and were less likely to report smoking at the time of delivery.ConclusionIn our rural population matched for contemporaneous delivery and parity, we found no difference in traditional perinatal outcome measures and that group care was positively associated with the key public health variables of not smoking and initiating breastfeeding. If future studies in other populations have similar findings, it may be wise to provide group care more widely to rural populations.
引用
收藏
页码:575 / 581
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Group Prenatal Care: Model Fidelity and Outcomes
    Novick, Gina
    Reid, Allecia E.
    Lewis, Jessica
    Kershaw, Trace
    Rising, Sharon S.
    Ickovics, Jeannette R.
    JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH, 2013, 58 (05) : 586 - 586
  • [22] Group Multimodal Prenatal Care and Postpartum Outcomes
    Avalos, Lyndsay A.
    Oberman, Nina
    Gomez, Lizeth
    Quesenberry, Charles P.
    Sinclair, Fiona
    Kurtovich, Elaine
    Gunderson, Erica P.
    Hedderson, Monique M.
    Stark, Joanna
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2024, 7 (05) : E2412280
  • [23] The effect of prenatal care on perinatal outcomes or urban and rural Mexican women in Guanajuato, Mexico.
    Beart, JA
    Richstone, L
    Miller, LT
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 1998, 46 (01) : 112A - 112A
  • [24] Group versus traditional prenatal care: a retrospective cohort study
    Carter, Ebony B.
    Akin, Jennifer
    Barbier, Kate
    Sarabia, Rebecca
    Macones, George A.
    Cahill, Alison G.
    Tuuli, Methodius G.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 214 (01) : S161 - S161
  • [25] Group Prenatal Care and Maternal Outcomes A Scoping Review
    Tucker, Curisa M.
    Felder, Tisha M.
    Dail, Robin B.
    Lyndon, Audrey
    Allen, Kari-Claudia
    MCN-THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-CHILD NURSING, 2021, 46 (06) : 314 - 322
  • [26] Effects of CenteringPregnancy Group Prenatal Care on Breastfeeding Outcomes
    Tanner-Smith, Emily E.
    Steinka-Fry, Katarzyna T.
    Lipsey, Mark W.
    JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH, 2013, 58 (04) : 389 - 395
  • [27] The comparative effects of group prenatal care on psychosocial outcomes
    Heberlein, Emily C.
    Picklesimer, Amy H.
    Billings, Deborah L.
    Covington-Kolb, Sarah
    Farber, Naomi
    Frongillo, Edward A.
    ARCHIVES OF WOMENS MENTAL HEALTH, 2016, 19 (02) : 259 - 269
  • [28] The comparative effects of group prenatal care on psychosocial outcomes
    Emily C. Heberlein
    Amy H. Picklesimer
    Deborah L. Billings
    Sarah Covington-Kolb
    Naomi Farber
    Edward A. Frongillo
    Archives of Women's Mental Health, 2016, 19 : 259 - 269
  • [29] Does group prenatal care improve pregnancy outcomes?
    Williams, Kia J.
    Zolotor, Adam
    Kaufmann, Lee
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY PRACTICE, 2009, 58 (07): : 384A - 384C
  • [30] Centering contraception: postpartum contraceptive choices of women enrolled in Centering group prenatal care versus traditional prenatal care
    Smith, Erin
    BMJ SEXUAL & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2018, 44 (02) : 103 - 108