Group Prenatal Care vs. Traditional Prenatal Care: A Parity-Matched Comparison of Perinatal Outcomes in a Rural Community

被引:2
|
作者
Jones, Talitha H. [1 ]
Crump, William J. [1 ]
Foster, Shannon M. [2 ]
Mullins, Samantha J. [2 ]
Farris, Alicia N. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Louisville, Sch Med, Baptist Hlth Madisonville, Trover Campus,200 Clin Dr, 3rd North, Madisonville, KY 42431 USA
[2] Univ Tennessee Nashville Family Med Residency, 1020 N Highland Ave Murfreesboro, Murfreesboro, TN 37130 USA
[3] Mem Hlth Obstet & Gynecol Residency, 4700 Waters Ave, Savannah, GA 31404 USA
关键词
Traditional prenatal care; Group prenatal care; Rural health care; Perinatal outcomes; PRETERM BIRTH; WEIGHT; TRIAL; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s10995-023-03600-z
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
SignificanceWe provide a comprehensive table comparingprevious studies of group care with a focus on differences in the populationsstudied. Ours is the first to provide perinatal outcomes from a ruralpopulation in the US and only the second to match for parity, a keypredictor. Our groups were smaller than previous reports, but our completematching on parity and contemporaneous delivery of the control group are strengths. We found no difference intraditional perinatal outcome, but group care patients reported higher rates ofbreastfeeding and not smoking, a difference only found in two previousurban-based reports. PurposePrenatal care is important for positive outcomes for both mother and infant. The traditional one-on-one method remains the most common. This study aimed to compare perinatal outcomes of patients attending group prenatal care with traditional prenatal care. Most previously published comparisons did not match for parity, a key predictor of perinatal outcome.DescriptionWe collected perinatal outcome data for 137group prenatal care patients and 137 traditional prenatal care patients,matched for contemporaneous delivery and parity, who delivered at our smallrural hospital during 2015-2016. We included key public health variables,including the initiation of breastfeeding, and smoking at the time of delivery.AssessmentThere was no difference between the two groups for maternal age or infant ethnicity, induced or augmented labor, preterm deliveries, APGAR scores less than 7, low birth weight, NICU admissions, or cesarean deliveries. Group care patients had more prenatal visits and were more likely to initiate breastfeeding and were less likely to report smoking at the time of delivery.ConclusionIn our rural population matched for contemporaneous delivery and parity, we found no difference in traditional perinatal outcome measures and that group care was positively associated with the key public health variables of not smoking and initiating breastfeeding. If future studies in other populations have similar findings, it may be wise to provide group care more widely to rural populations.
引用
收藏
页码:575 / 581
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Group Prenatal Care vs. Traditional Prenatal Care: A Parity-Matched Comparison of Perinatal Outcomes in a Rural Community
    Talitha H. Jones
    William J. Crump
    Shannon M. Foster
    Samantha J. Mullins
    Alicia N. Farris
    Maternal and Child Health Journal, 2023, 27 : 575 - 581
  • [2] Lack of prenatal care in a traditional community: trends and perinatal outcomes
    Sara Abu-Ghanem
    Eyal Sheiner
    Michael Sherf
    Arnon Wiznitzer
    Ruslan Sergienko
    Ilana Shoham-Vardi
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2012, 285 : 1237 - 1242
  • [3] Lack of prenatal care in a traditional community: trends and perinatal outcomes
    Abu-Ghanem, Sara
    Sheiner, Eyal
    Sherf, Michael
    Wiznitzer, Arnon
    Sergienko, Ruslan
    Shoham-Vardi, Ilana
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2012, 285 (05) : 1237 - 1242
  • [4] Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Group vs. Traditional Prenatal Care for Improving Equity in Birth Outcomes
    Crockett, Amy H.
    Chen, Liwei
    Heberlein, Emily
    Covington-Kolb, Sarah
    Britt, Jessica
    Sun, Xiaoqian
    Witrick, Brian
    Zhang, Lu
    Miller, Greg E.
    Borders, Ann
    Keenan-Devlin, Lauren S.
    Heo, Moonseong
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 226 (01) : S2 - S3
  • [5] Group prenatal care and perinatal outcomes - A randomized controlled trial
    Ickovics, Jeannette R.
    Kershaw, Trace S.
    Westdahl, Claire
    Magriples, Urania
    Massey, Zohar
    Reynolds, Heather
    Rising, Sharon Schindler
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 110 (02): : 330 - 339
  • [6] Comparison of selected outcomes of ConteringPregnancy versus traditional prenatal care
    Baldwin, Karen A.
    JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH, 2006, 51 (04) : 266 - 272
  • [7] Group prenatal care and perinatal outcomes: A randomized controlled trial - Reply
    Ickovics, Jeannette R.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 111 (04): : 993 - 994
  • [8] Group compared to traditional prenatal care for optimizing perinatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Carter, Ebony B.
    Temming, Lorene
    Akin, Jennifer
    Fowler, Susan
    Macones, George A.
    Colditz, Graham
    Tuuli, Methodius G.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 214 (01) : S382 - S382
  • [9] Psychosocial outcomes of group prenatal care
    Emily Boothe
    Marta Olenderek
    M. Cristina Noyola
    Julia Rushing
    Erinn Allred
    Sebastian Kaplan
    Journal of Public Health, 2022, 30 : 1373 - 1380
  • [10] Psychosocial outcomes of group prenatal care
    Boothe, Emily
    Olenderek, Marta
    Noyola, M. Cristina
    Rushing, Julia
    Allred, Erinn
    Kaplan, Sebastian
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH-HEIDELBERG, 2022, 30 (06): : 1373 - 1380