Use of tree-based machine learning methods to screen affinitive peptides based on docking data

被引:1
|
作者
Feng, Hua [1 ]
Wang, Fangyu [1 ]
Li, Ning [1 ]
Xu, Qian [1 ]
Zheng, Guanming [1 ,2 ]
Sun, Xuefeng [1 ]
Hu, Man [1 ]
Li, Xuewu [1 ]
Xing, Guangxu [1 ]
Zhang, Gaiping [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Henan Agr Univ, Coll Food Sci & Technol, Zhengzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Henan Univ Chinese Med, Publ Hlth & Prevent Med Teaching & Res Ctr, Zhengzhou, Henan, Peoples R China
[3] Longhu Modern Immunol Lab, Zhengzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Peking Univ, Sch Adv Agr Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] Yangzhou Univ, Jiangsu Coinnovat Ctr Prevent & Control Important, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
affinity classification; docking data; machine learning; peptides; tree-based algorithms; FEATURE-SELECTION; PROTEIN; BINDING;
D O I
10.1002/minf.202300143
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
Screening peptides with good affinity is an important step in peptide-drug discovery. Recent advancement in computer and data science have made machine learning a useful tool in accurately affinitive-peptide screening. In current study, four different tree-based algorithms, including Classification and regression trees (CART), C5.0 decision tree (C50), Bagged CART (BAG) and Random Forest (RF), were employed to explore the relationship between experimental peptide affinities and virtual docking data, and the performance of each model was also compared in parallel. All four algorithms showed better performances on dataset pre-scaled, -centered and -PCA than other pre-processed dataset. After model re-built and hyperparameter optimization, the optimal C50 model (C50O) showed the best performances in terms of Accuracy, Kappa, Sensitivity, Specificity, F1, MCC and AUC when validated on test data and an unknown PEDV datasets evaluation (Accuracy=80.4 %). BAG and RFO (the optimal RF), as two best models during training process, did not performed as expecting during in testing and unknown dataset validations. Furthermore, the high correlation of the predictions of RFO and BAG to C50O implied the high stability and robustness of their prediction. Whereas although the good performance on unknown dataset, the poor performance in test data validation and correlation analysis indicated CARTO could not be used for future data prediction. To accurately evaluate the peptide affinity, the current study firstly gave a tree-model competition on affinitive peptide prediction by using virtual docking data, which would expand the application of machine learning algorithms in studying PepPIs and benefit the development of peptide therapeutics. image
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Assessment of flood susceptibility prediction based on optimized tree-based machine learning models
    Eslaminezhad, Seyed Ahmad
    Eftekhari, Mobin
    Azma, Aliasghar
    Kiyanfar, Ramin
    Akbari, Mohammad
    JOURNAL OF WATER AND CLIMATE CHANGE, 2022, 13 (06) : 2353 - 2385
  • [42] MACHINE LEARNING TO JUDGE LABOR RELATIONS' HARMONIOUSNESS BASED ON DECISION TREE-BASED METHOD
    Chen, Tianxue
    Yang, Heqing
    3RD INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INFORMATION ENGINEERING AND ELECTRONIC COMMERCE (IEEC 2011), PROCEEDINGS, 2011, : 243 - 246
  • [43] Land subsidence modelling using tree-based machine learning algorithms
    Rahmati, Omid
    Falah, Fatemeh
    Naghibi, Seyed Amir
    Biggs, Trent
    Soltani, Milad
    Deo, Ravinesh C.
    Cerda, Artemi
    Mohammadi, Farnoush
    Dieu Tien Bui
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 672 : 239 - 252
  • [44] Discussion on the tree-based machine learning model in the study of landslide susceptibility
    Liu, Qiang
    Tang, Aiping
    Huang, Ziyuan
    Sun, Lixin
    Han, Xiaosheng
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2022, 113 (02) : 887 - 911
  • [45] Discussion on the tree-based machine learning model in the study of landslide susceptibility
    Qiang Liu
    Aiping Tang
    Ziyuan Huang
    Lixin Sun
    Xiaosheng Han
    Natural Hazards, 2022, 113 : 887 - 911
  • [46] Faster Convergence with Lexicase Selection in Tree-Based Automated Machine Learning
    Matsumoto, Nicholas
    Saini, Anil Kumar
    Ribeiro, Pedro
    Choi, Hyunjun
    Orlenko, Alena
    Lyytikainen, Leo-Pekka
    Laurikka, Jari O.
    Lehtimaki, Terho
    Batista, Sandra
    Moore, Jason H.
    GENETIC PROGRAMMING, EUROGP 2023, 2023, 13986 : 165 - 181
  • [47] A tree-based machine learning methodology to automatically classify software vulnerabilities
    Aivatoglou, Georgios
    Anastasiadis, Mike
    Spanos, Georgios
    Voulgaridis, Antonis
    Votis, Konstantinos
    Tzovaras, Dimitrios
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2021 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CYBER SECURITY AND RESILIENCE (IEEE CSR), 2021, : 312 - 317
  • [48] Advanced tree-based machine learning methods for predicting the seismic response of regular and irregular RC frames
    Demir, Ahmet
    Sahin, Emrehan Kutlug
    Demir, Selcuk
    STRUCTURES, 2024, 64
  • [49] Malware Detection Method using Tree-based Machine Learning Algorithms
    Okada, Satoshi
    Matsuda, Wataru
    Fujimoto, Mariko
    Mitsunaga, Takuho
    2021 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING (ICOCO), 2021, : 103 - 108
  • [50] Machine learning approaches outperform distance- and tree-based methods for DNA barcoding of Pterocarpus wood
    He, Tuo
    Jiao, Lichao
    Wiedenhoeft, Alex C.
    Yin, Yafang
    PLANTA, 2019, 249 (05) : 1617 - 1625