Use of tree-based machine learning methods to screen affinitive peptides based on docking data

被引:1
|
作者
Feng, Hua [1 ]
Wang, Fangyu [1 ]
Li, Ning [1 ]
Xu, Qian [1 ]
Zheng, Guanming [1 ,2 ]
Sun, Xuefeng [1 ]
Hu, Man [1 ]
Li, Xuewu [1 ]
Xing, Guangxu [1 ]
Zhang, Gaiping [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Henan Agr Univ, Coll Food Sci & Technol, Zhengzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Henan Univ Chinese Med, Publ Hlth & Prevent Med Teaching & Res Ctr, Zhengzhou, Henan, Peoples R China
[3] Longhu Modern Immunol Lab, Zhengzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Peking Univ, Sch Adv Agr Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] Yangzhou Univ, Jiangsu Coinnovat Ctr Prevent & Control Important, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
affinity classification; docking data; machine learning; peptides; tree-based algorithms; FEATURE-SELECTION; PROTEIN; BINDING;
D O I
10.1002/minf.202300143
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
Screening peptides with good affinity is an important step in peptide-drug discovery. Recent advancement in computer and data science have made machine learning a useful tool in accurately affinitive-peptide screening. In current study, four different tree-based algorithms, including Classification and regression trees (CART), C5.0 decision tree (C50), Bagged CART (BAG) and Random Forest (RF), were employed to explore the relationship between experimental peptide affinities and virtual docking data, and the performance of each model was also compared in parallel. All four algorithms showed better performances on dataset pre-scaled, -centered and -PCA than other pre-processed dataset. After model re-built and hyperparameter optimization, the optimal C50 model (C50O) showed the best performances in terms of Accuracy, Kappa, Sensitivity, Specificity, F1, MCC and AUC when validated on test data and an unknown PEDV datasets evaluation (Accuracy=80.4 %). BAG and RFO (the optimal RF), as two best models during training process, did not performed as expecting during in testing and unknown dataset validations. Furthermore, the high correlation of the predictions of RFO and BAG to C50O implied the high stability and robustness of their prediction. Whereas although the good performance on unknown dataset, the poor performance in test data validation and correlation analysis indicated CARTO could not be used for future data prediction. To accurately evaluate the peptide affinity, the current study firstly gave a tree-model competition on affinitive peptide prediction by using virtual docking data, which would expand the application of machine learning algorithms in studying PepPIs and benefit the development of peptide therapeutics. image
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] On the Efficacy and Vulnerabilities of Logic Locking in Tree-Based Machine Learning
    de Abreu, Brunno Alves
    Paim, Guilherme
    Alrahis, Lilas
    Flores, Paulo
    Sinanoglu, Ozgur
    Bampi, Sergio
    Amrouch, Hussam
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS I-REGULAR PAPERS, 2025, 72 (01) : 180 - 191
  • [22] Tree-based machine learning approaches for equity market predictions
    Wolff, Dominik
    Neugebauer, Ulrich
    JOURNAL OF ASSET MANAGEMENT, 2019, 20 (04) : 273 - 288
  • [23] Leveraging Tree-based Machine Learning for Predicting Earnings Management
    Huy, Tam Phan
    Hong, Tuyet Pham
    Quoc, An Bui Nguyen
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL COMMERCE ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2025,
  • [24] A Tree-Based Machine Learning Method for Pipeline Leakage Detection
    Shen, Yongxin
    Cheng, Weiping
    WATER, 2022, 14 (18)
  • [25] Comparing performance of non–tree-based and tree-based association mapping methods
    Katherine L. Thompson
    David W. Fardo
    BMC Proceedings, 10 (Suppl 7)
  • [26] Analysing the Determinants of Surface Solar Radiation with Tree-Based Machine Learning Methods: Case of Istanbul
    Guven, Denizhan
    PURE AND APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2024, 181 (05) : 1633 - 1659
  • [27] Salivary metabolomics with alternative decision tree-based machine learning methods for breast cancer discrimination
    Murata, Takeshi
    Yanagisawa, Takako
    Kurihara, Toshiaki
    Kaneko, Miku
    Ota, Sana
    Enomoto, Ayame
    Tomita, Masaru
    Sugimoto, Masahiro
    Sunamura, Makoto
    Hayashida, Tetsu
    Kitagawa, Yuko
    Jinno, Hiromitsu
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2019, 177 (03) : 591 - 601
  • [28] Salivary metabolomics with alternative decision tree-based machine learning methods for breast cancer discrimination
    Takeshi Murata
    Takako Yanagisawa
    Toshiaki Kurihara
    Miku Kaneko
    Sana Ota
    Ayame Enomoto
    Masaru Tomita
    Masahiro Sugimoto
    Makoto Sunamura
    Tetsu Hayashida
    Yuko Kitagawa
    Hiromitsu Jinno
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2019, 177 : 591 - 601
  • [29] Modelling Soil Temperature by Tree-Based Machine Learning Methods in Different Climatic Regions of China
    Dong, Jianhua
    Huang, Guomin
    Wu, Lifeng
    Liu, Fa
    Li, Sien
    Cui, Yaokui
    Wang, Yicheng
    Leng, Menghui
    Wu, Jie
    Wu, Shaofei
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (10):
  • [30] Scaling tree-based automated machine learning to biomedical big data with a feature set selector
    Le, Trang T.
    Fu, Weixuan
    Moore, Jason H.
    BIOINFORMATICS, 2020, 36 (01) : 250 - 256