Performance contests and merit pay with empathic employees

被引:0
|
作者
Fabel, Oliver [1 ,4 ]
Mauser, Sandra [2 ]
Zhang, Yingchao [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vienna, Fac Business Econom & Stat, Dept Business Decis & Analyt, Int Personnel Management, Vienna, Austria
[2] Univ Vienna, Fac Business Econom & Stat, Dept Business Adm, Managerial Accounting Grp, Vienna, Austria
[3] Univ Durham, Business Sch, Durham, England
[4] Univ Vienna, Fac Business Econom & Stat, Dept Business Decis & Analyt, Int Personnel Management, Oskar-Morgenstern-Pl 1, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
关键词
GENDER-DIFFERENCES; AFFIRMATIVE-ACTION; COMPETITION; GAP; PREFERENCES; ALTRUISM; INCENTIVES; PRESSURE; WOMEN; TOURNAMENTS;
D O I
10.1002/mde.4003
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper studies the behavioral responses of employees who are endowed with empathic abilities to different institutional designs of incentive pay. Empathic abilities motivate altruistic behavior by sensing the other's feelings toward oneself. In performance contests, empathic individuals withhold effort, most (less) strongly when facing a non-empathic (empathic) contestant. Effort levels of both non-empathic and empathic individuals increase with a higher probability that the contestant is of their own type. By developing a theoretical model, our analysis contributes to understanding observed individual behavior in experiments and corresponding econometric evidence. With direct merit pay, effort choices only depend on the signaling quality of the performance measure. Individuals with stronger empathic abilities may shy away from performance contests to, instead, receive merit pay. If gender governs empathic abilities, setting incentives by performance contests cannot simultaneously ensure equal pay and equal opportunities.
引用
收藏
页码:353 / 372
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] On the merit of equal pay: Performance manipulation and incentive setting
    Corgnet, Brice
    Martin, Ludivine
    Ndodjang, Peguy
    Sutan, Angela
    EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2019, 113 : 23 - 45
  • [22] INCENTIVES, PAY, AND PERFORMANCE - A STUDY OF AUSTRALIAN EMPLOYEES
    DRAGO, R
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 1991, 23 (09) : 1433 - 1446
  • [23] WHY NOT MERIT PAY
    DENNIS, LJ
    CONTEMPORARY EDUCATION, 1982, 54 (01): : 18 - 21
  • [24] Winner-pay contests
    Andrew J. Yates
    Public Choice, 2011, 147 : 93 - 106
  • [25] Winner-pay contests
    Yates, Andrew J.
    PUBLIC CHOICE, 2011, 147 (1-2) : 93 - 106
  • [26] All-Pay Contests
    Siegel, Ron
    ECONOMETRICA, 2009, 77 (01) : 71 - 92
  • [27] A case for merit pay
    Hoerr, TR
    PHI DELTA KAPPAN, 1998, 80 (04) : 326 - 327
  • [28] IS THIS THE END OF MERIT PAY
    SHANKER, A
    NEW REPUBLIC, 1993, 208 (16) : 13 - 13
  • [29] THE MERITS OF MERIT PAY
    COHEN, DK
    MURNANE, RJ
    PUBLIC INTEREST, 1985, (80) : 3 - 30
  • [30] BEYOND MERIT PAY
    SHANKER, A
    NEW REPUBLIC, 1995, 212 (06) : 6 - 6