Standard internal limiting membrane peeling versus internal limiting membrane abrasion technique for primary epiretinal membrane surgery

被引:1
|
作者
Bagci, Fatma [1 ]
Citirik, Mehmet [1 ]
Dulger, Selda Celik [1 ]
Teke, Mehmet Yasin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hlth Sci, Ulucanlar Eye Training & Res Hosp, Ankara, Turkiye
关键词
Epiretinal membrane; Vitrectomy; Diamond-dusted membrane scraper; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; THICKNESS MACULAR HOLE; FIBER LAYER APPEARANCE; INDOCYANINE GREEN; REMOVAL; VITRECTOMY; PUCKER;
D O I
10.5935/0004-2749.2021-0208
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
| Purposes: The purpose of this study is to compare the standard inner limiting membrane peeling technique to the inner limiting membrane abrasion technique with respect to visual outcomes and central retinal thickness in the primary epiretinal membrane surgery. Methods: A total of 59 eyes from 57 epiretinal membrane patients were separated into two groups including the standard inner limiting membrane peeling group and the inner limiting membrane peeling with abrasion technique group. At 6, 12, and 24 months of follow-up, the mean alteration in best-corrected visual acuity and central retinal thickness were assessed for each group. Results: The study includes 32 (54%) standard inner peeling and 27 (46%) inner limiting membrane peeling with abrasion technique patients. The mean preoperative logMAR best-corrected visual acuity for the standard inner limiting membrane peeling and inner limiting membrane peeling with abrasion groups was 0.73 (+/- 0.29) and 0.61 (+/- 0.3) respectively. At 6, 12, and 24 months of follow-up, the best-corrected visual acuity improved significantly in each group. At each period of observation, the alteration in best-corrected visual acuity was not statistically significant (p=0.54, p=0.52, p=0.67). When comparing the alterations between the standard inner limiting membrane peeling and inner limiting membrane peeling with abrasion technique groups at 6 months (p=0.26) and 24 months (p=0.06), no statistically significant differences were observed, but they were statistically different at 12 months (p=0.03), reflecting a greater reduction in central retinal thickness for the inner limiting membrane peeling with abrasion technique group after one year. Conclusion: Abrasion of the inner limiting membrane with a diamond-dusted membrane scraper during epiretinal membrane surgery demonstrates similar effectiveness to the standard inner limiting membrane peeling technique. At 12 months, retinal thinning was found to be more significant in inner limiting membrane peeling with abrasion technique patients in terms of central retinal thickness values. As a result, it may be argued that the inner limiting membrane abrasion technique eliminates the inner limiting membrane and related structures more effectively while inflicting less retinal damage.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Perifoveal Microvascular Changes Following Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling Surgery for Epiretinal Membrane and Macular Hole
    Kim, Kiyoung
    Yoon, Kyungwoo
    Park, Jong Beom
    Kang, Min Seok
    Kim, Eung Suk
    Yu, Seung-Young
    OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2023, 246 (5-6) : 324 - 332
  • [32] Effect of Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling on Macular Structure and Metamorphopsia Scores in Idiopathic Epiretinal Membrane Surgery
    Aydin, Tekin
    Kerci, Suleyman Gokhan
    Karti, Omer
    Zengin, Mehmet Ozgur
    Kusbeci, Tuncay
    OPEN OPHTHALMOLOGY JOURNAL, 2020, 14 : 1 - 8
  • [33] With or without internal limiting membrane peeling during idiopathic epiretinal membrane surgery: A meta-analysis
    Huang, Qinying
    Li, Jinying
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (01):
  • [34] Trypan blue assisted peeling of the internal limiting membrane during macular hole and epiretinal membrane surgery
    Perrier, M
    Sébag, M
    Gauthier, D
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2003, 44 : U669 - U669
  • [35] Fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane peeling versus complete internal limiting membrane peeling for myopic traction maculopathy
    Iwasaki, Masanori
    Miyamoto, Hirotomo
    Okushiba, Utako
    Imaizumi, Hiroko
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 64 (01) : 13 - 21
  • [36] Fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane peeling versus complete internal limiting membrane peeling for myopic traction maculopathy
    Masanori Iwasaki
    Hirotomo Miyamoto
    Utako Okushiba
    Hiroko Imaizumi
    Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology, 2020, 64 : 13 - 21
  • [37] Efficacy of Fovea-Sparing Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Epiretinal Membrane Foveoschisis
    Sekine, Reio
    Kogo, Jiro
    Jujo, Tatsuya
    Sato, Keiji
    Arizono, Ibuki
    Kawagoe, Tatsukata
    Tokuda, Naoto
    Kitaoka, Yasushi
    Takagi, Hitoshi
    OPHTHALMIC RESEARCH, 2022, 65 (02) : 162 - 170
  • [38] Internal limiting membrane peeling prevents recurrence of epiretinal membrane in vitrectomy for macular pucker
    Yokota, Y
    Hashimoto, H
    Suzuki, A
    Kishi, S
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2005, 46
  • [39] The effect of internal limiting membrane peeling in surgical treatment of combined hamartoma and epiretinal membrane
    Park, J. M.
    Jung, L. Soo
    Hyun, P. Ji
    In, Y. Myung
    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2017, 95
  • [40] The Effect of Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling in Epiretinal Membrane Including Pseudolamellar Macular Hole
    Park, Jung Min
    Oh, Shin Yeop
    Lee, Soo Jung
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2013, 54 (15)