Protocol of a scoping review of outcome domains in dermatology

被引:0
|
作者
Nadir, Umer [1 ]
Ahmed, Areeba [1 ]
Michael, D. Yi [1 ]
Hisham, Farhana Ikmal [1 ]
Dave, Loma [1 ]
Kottner, Jan [2 ]
Ezzedine, K. [3 ]
Garg, Amit [4 ]
Ingram, John R. [5 ]
Jemec, Gregor Borut Ernst [6 ]
Spuls, Phyllis, I [7 ]
Kirkham, Jamie J. [8 ]
Cahn, Brian [9 ]
Alam, Murad [10 ]
机构
[1] Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Dermatol, Chicago, IL USA
[2] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Berlin, Germany
[3] Henri Mondor Hosp, AP HP, Serv Dermatol, Paris, France
[4] Hofstra Northwell Sch Med, Dept Dermatol, Long Isl City, NY USA
[5] Cardiff Univ, Cardiff, Wales
[6] Roskilde Univ Hosp, Dermatol, Roskilde, Denmark
[7] Univ Amsterdam, Locat Acad Med Ctr, Amsterdam Publ Hlth Infect & Immun, Dept Dermatol,Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[8] Univ Manchester, Biostat, Manchester, Lancs, England
[9] Univ Illinois, Dept Dermatol, Chicago, IL USA
[10] Northwestern Univ, Dermatol, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2024年 / 14卷 / 02期
关键词
Dermatology; Protocols & guidelines; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; SETS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Core outcome sets (COSs) are agreed outcomes (domains (subdomains) and instruments) that should be measured as a minimum in clinical trials or practice in certain diseases or clinical fields. Worldwide, the number of COSs is increasing and there might be conceptual overlaps of domains (subdomains) and instruments within disciplines. The aim of this scoping review is to map and to classify all outcomes identified with COS projects relating to skin diseases. Methods and analysis We will conduct a scoping review of outcomes of skin disease-related COS initiatives to identify all concepts and their definitions. We will search PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library. The search dates will be 1 January 2010 (the point at which Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) was established) to 1 January 2024. We will also review the COMET database and C3 website to identify parts of COSs (domains and/or instruments) that are being developed and published. This review will be supplemented by querying relevant stakeholders from COS organisations, dermatology organisations and patient organisations for additional COSs that were developed. The resulting long lists of outcomes will then be mapped into conceptually similar concepts. Ethics and dissemination This study was supported by departmental research funds from the Department of Dermatology at Northwestern University. An ethics committee review was waived since this protocol was done by staff researchers with no involvement of patient care. Conflicts of interests, if any, will be addressed by replacing participants with relevant conflicts or reassigning them. The results will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals, social media posts and promotion by COS organisations.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Protocol for a scoping review of sepsis epidemiology
    M. Elizabeth Wilcox
    Marietou Daou
    Joanna C. Dionne
    Peter Dodek
    Marina Englesakis
    Allan Garland
    Claire Lauzon
    Osama Loubani
    Bram Rochwerg
    Manu Shankar-Hari
    Kednapa Thavorn
    Andrea C. Tricco
    Systematic Reviews, 11
  • [32] Identifying context-specific domains for assessing antimicrobial stewardship programmes in Asia: protocol for a scoping review
    Huong Thi Lan Vu
    Hamers, Raph L.
    Limato, Ralalicia
    Limmathurotsakul, Direk
    Karkey, Abhilasha
    Ashley, Elizabeth Dodds
    Anderson, Deverick
    Patel, Payal K.
    Patel, Twisha S.
    Lessa, Fernanda C.
    van Doorn, H. Rogier
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (09):
  • [33] The epidemiology of competence: protocol for a scoping review
    Takahashi, Susan Glover
    Herold, Jodi
    Nayer, Marla
    Bance, Sheena
    BMJ OPEN, 2014, 4 (12):
  • [34] Protocol for a scoping review to map patient engagement in scoping reviews
    Oravec N.
    Monnin C.
    Gregora A.
    Bjorklund B.
    Dave M.G.
    Schultz A.S.H.
    Chudyk A.M.
    Research Involvement and Engagement, 8 (1)
  • [35] Identifying common core outcome domains from core outcome sets of musculoskeletal conditions: protocol for a systematic review
    Tamer S. Sabet
    David B. Anderson
    Peter W. Stubbs
    Rachelle Buchbinder
    Caroline B. Terwee
    Alessandro Chiarotto
    Joel Gagnier
    Arianne P. Verhagen
    Systematic Reviews, 11
  • [36] Identifying common core outcome domains from core outcome sets of musculoskeletal conditions: protocol for a systematic review
    Sabet, Tamer S.
    Anderson, David B.
    Stubbs, Peter W.
    Buchbinder, Rachelle
    Terwee, Caroline B.
    Chiarotto, Alessandro
    Gagnier, Joel
    Verhagen, Arianne P.
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2022, 11 (01)
  • [37] Thematic analysis of manuscript review process in dermatology core outcome set (COS) research: Study protocol
    Ahmed, A.
    Ma, M. S.
    Shi, Vj
    Koza, E.
    Haq, M.
    Cahn, B.
    Schlessinger, D.
    Pearlman, R.
    Alam, M.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY, 2024, 144 (08) : S56 - S56
  • [38] Health net-outcome objectives and approaches for spatial planning and development: a scoping review protocol
    Stewart-Evans, James
    Wilson, Emma
    Langley, Tessa
    Hands, Angela
    Leonardi-Bee, Jo
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2024, 22 (11) : 2394 - 2403
  • [39] Novel patient-centred outcome in cancer care, days at home: a scoping review protocol
    Ribeiro, Tiago
    Mahar, Alyson
    Jerath, Angela
    Bondzi-Simpson, Adom
    Barabash, Victoria
    Barr, Austin A.
    Wright, Frances C.
    Kosyachkova, Ekaterina
    Deleemans, Julie
    Coburn, Natalie G.
    Hallet, Julie
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (03):
  • [40] Outcome measures of palliative care programs and interventions implemented in nursing homes: a scoping review protocol
    Meng, Lingyuan
    Peters, Micah D. J.
    Sharplin, Greg
    Eckert, Marion
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2022, 20 (02) : 715 - 722